Automotive News / Industry / Future Vehicle Discussion Automotive news and discussion about upcoming vehicles

2003 Silverado SS Picture!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-21-2002, 11:34 PM
  #1  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
formula79's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: USA
Posts: 3,698
Post 2003 Silverado SS Picture!

I wanna thanks Zane at GM-trucks.com for giving me the heads up on this one. The Pic is at www.gminsidenews.com or www.gm-trucks.com

------------------
Branden-Founder www.GMInsidenews.com
The #1 GM News Site on the Net!
1995 Firebird A4
White with red leather
1979 Firebird Formula SOLD!!! 8/2001
Visit my homepage!

Standing tall for V6 F-body owners everywhere!
formula79 is offline  
Old 06-21-2002, 11:42 PM
  #2  
Registered User
 
johnsocal's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 1969
Location: Southern California (SoCal)
Posts: 1,912
Post

Formula,

Thanks for the info!!

It does have a nice agressive front.

Do you know if the bed of the truck has been seemlessly connected to the rest of the body like the Silv. SS show car (or SSR) or is the the bed a seperate piece like all other GM trucks?
johnsocal is offline  
Old 06-21-2002, 11:46 PM
  #3  
Registered User
 
Burmite's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: New York, NY
Posts: 581
Post

Sweet. I like the front on that. But what color is that? Is that Electron Blue from the Corvette? Anyways, I'm disappointed about the power figures but it still looks pretty agressive. I like it.
Burmite is offline  
Old 06-22-2002, 01:33 AM
  #4  
Registered User
 
guionM's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: The Golden State
Posts: 13,711
Thumbs up

1st version of the new front end I saw that I like. Color is great.
guionM is offline  
Old 06-22-2002, 01:38 AM
  #5  
Registered User
 
BadIroc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 1998
Location: Holden, Massachusetts
Posts: 187
Cool

I like it! Iam also kind of dissapointed about the figures as well, I think the GM performance team could of tried a little harder but can't wait till the aftermarket companies start getting a hold of them. Id rather a reg. cab then an ext. cab, but hey its better then nothing and looks mean as well and come on im sure it will still boot Id say high to mid 14's??

------------------
1988 Camaro IROCZ "MIDNIGHT CRUIZERS"
305 ci Tuned Port 700R4
3"Exhaust/Flowmaster 80 series muffler/Dynomax high flow cat/CutOut
hypertech chip/k&n filers, cut MAF screen gutted air box
"Theres no replacement for displacement"
My Iroc web page....
www.geocities.com/bobfitz82/index.html
BadIroc is offline  
Old 06-22-2002, 02:01 AM
  #6  
Registered User
 
90 Z28SS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: South Bend , IN
Posts: 2,801
Post

Too bad it will get absolutely stomped by its competition ....both of them . I love the way it looks though .

------------------
Derek 95 Trans Am convertible
K&N fipk , CSI h20 pump , hooker lt's , mufflex 4" , LT1edit , ET streets , 373's , !A/C , !smog
Best Et 12.771@106.89
Best 60ft. 1.820
MTI/GTP stage 3 LT4 heads , cc306 , hyra-rev , 1.6's , r lifters , full manual 700r4 , ST3500 verter , roll bar and more all in the garage waiting for install .
92 Z28 - 5.7/G92 , stock daily driver
90 Z28SS is offline  
Old 06-22-2002, 08:40 AM
  #7  
Registered User
 
HuJass's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: CNY
Posts: 2,224
Post

It looks nice. Too bad about the extended cab. I like the wheels alot.
HuJass is offline  
Old 06-22-2002, 08:48 AM
  #8  
Registered User
 
Z28x's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: Albany, NY
Posts: 10,287
Post

it looks awsome!!! does it have the extra short bed like the red 2001 Concept?? I hope they go with the composite bed too, to make it a little lighter/faster. I just wish it had a motor that put out more or the same HP as the lightning. 420HP 8.1L or LS6 would have been nice.

I think it will be pretty fast with 345HP. For example, take a look at the June Car & Driver. They do a long term test of the 2001 GMC C3, here are the times they get with it new and broken in after 40,000mi.

NEW
0-60 7.8
1/4mi 16.0 @ 86mph

40,000
0-60 6.8
1/4mi 15.2 @ 87mph

I think this truck will get into the 14's stock
Z28x is offline  
Old 06-22-2002, 09:48 AM
  #9  
Registered User
 
Darth Xed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Ohio
Posts: 8,504
Question

Pretty much what I expected... isn't it common knowledge that the entire Silverado lin eis getting an Avalanche-like facelift?

Darth Xed is offline  
Old 06-23-2002, 01:42 AM
  #10  
Registered User
 
305fan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Calgary
Posts: 1,308
Post

Love the colour, truck looks good. Powertrain sucks. What's the ...... diff between this
and a Seiarra Denali? 25hp and bigger wheels?

Sorry but it's a joke- how about a lighter 2WD- 6.0 LS6 400hp.

GM has the tools to make a MUCH better truck.
305fan is offline  
Old 06-23-2002, 02:17 AM
  #11  
Registered User
 
BigDarknFast's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Commerce, mi, USA
Posts: 2,139
Thumbs up

I like it quite a bit. Glad it doesn't have the silly chrome grille bar. Nice wheels. the engine is a little weak but has a lot of potential for those who want to build upon it. One thing some might have missed... the AWD. Remember the Syclone? I'd bet the AWD would give this truck nearly equivalent street performance, if it had a catback/headers/K&N, to a stock Lightning or Dodge SRT10 due to the others being RWD.

[This message has been edited by BigDarknFast (edited June 23, 2002).]
BigDarknFast is offline  
Old 06-23-2002, 03:11 AM
  #12  
Registered User
 
Chuck!'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Location: Cincinnati, OH
Posts: 2,612
Post

The styling looks great, its what I expected. I really like the style of the new GM trucks. It just really really sucks about 345 hp. It'll be great for 60' races.
Chuck! is offline  
Old 06-23-2002, 12:07 PM
  #13  
Registered User
 
Z28x's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: Albany, NY
Posts: 10,287
Post

We got a truck to compete with the S/C Harley. Now what about the Lightning and RAM SRT/10 ???????????????

The Silverado SS engine would be great for SSR!!
Z28x is offline  
Old 06-23-2002, 10:49 PM
  #14  
Registered User
 
305fan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Calgary
Posts: 1,308
Post

Bigdarkfast- if you mean by "nearly equivlant street performance by virtue of it's AWD of the SRT and Lightning"
that the Silverado will stay with them because the Lightning and SRT spin too much-

You might be right if the other guys can't drive! Eve if they can't, once they hook- they'll passs the "SS" (super slow?) like it's going backwards.

Although the Lightning has only "40hp" mor- it has like a 65LBS of torque advantage.

Coupled with the ext cab and AWD- it will make the SS several hundred pounds heavier-
you'll need more then headers and a cat back to be even close.

Not trying to flame you or anything BTW
It's just clear that Chevy is going after a different market with this truck. They want sales but refuse to give the truck decent performance. 2WD- reg or ext cab and 400hp-
and even I'd be cheering- (although it wouldn't be as fast)
305fan is offline  
Old 06-23-2002, 11:40 PM
  #15  
Registered User
 
RiceEating5.0's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Posts: 1,313
Post

I don't like the avalanche style front and would have preferred the regular silverado's.

And what happened to all that talk about them rolling on 20's? Those look like 17's.

On a scale of 1 to 10, i'd give it a 6.
RiceEating5.0 is offline  


Quick Reply: 2003 Silverado SS Picture!



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:17 AM.