'06 Impala SS autocrossing pics.
Re: '06 Impala SS autocrossing pics.
Originally Posted by Chrome383Z
It's an impala. What do you expect? Camaro-like performance? Jesus christ this thing will be in 30% of the soccer mom's driveways to get groceries (yes I'm still talking about the SS/LS4). If you want GM LS4 with alittle more performance buy the sportier GXP... I don't understand any of this really?
And the old B-Bodys IMO were UUGGGGGLLYYYYY. I would take this 2006 design hands down over the old one, FWD and all.
And the old B-Bodys IMO were UUGGGGGLLYYYYY. I would take this 2006 design hands down over the old one, FWD and all.
I actually thought about this on the ride home from work yesterday.
My car covers a lot of segments of what I want in a car but nothing to the extreme.
It’s a fast car but not a tire shredder.
Its sporty but stylish at the same time.
It feels just as strong in a corner as my old Camaro, but the ride quality is so much smoother. Which just like the Impala needs to be. It’s my comfy Daily driver, NOT A RACE CAR!
Seriously why are we even having this covo? Take your WS6 to the autocross and your Impy to Walmart!
Dont hate on W-bodies
Re: '06 Impala SS autocrossing pics.
Originally Posted by Eric Bryant
A lot of that comes from frustration over the fact that GM was too f*cking stupid to continue improving the breed, and instead decided to go compete with every other FWD wuss-sedan on the planet. It's that whole abandonment thing. You'd think that F-body owners might understand that.
I'll be interested in knowing if anyone gives a rat's *** about the new Impala SS 10 years from now.
Sorry for ranting, but anyone who thinks that GM is great for shoving a V8 into an FWD jellybean also has their head pretty far up their a**.
I'll be interested in knowing if anyone gives a rat's *** about the new Impala SS 10 years from now.
Sorry for ranting, but anyone who thinks that GM is great for shoving a V8 into an FWD jellybean also has their head pretty far up their a**.
However, I also understand that this car looks like its going to be pretty damn good, compete with the Charger on a handling and even acceleration basis (GXP = 5.9, Charger = 5.5-5.8), and do it for less money with a drive system that actually means the rust belt will like it.
I've got love for the '94-'96s...I also don't happen to think the new one is nearly the anti-christ some people think it is, either.
Re: '06 Impala SS autocrossing pics.
I think the problem is some of us focus on Impala, some of us focus on SS. Those of us that see SS expected something a little more along the lines of Super Sport. It's not too sporty, and not at all super, so if GM dropped the SS badge, I think we'd all be satisfied.
Re: '06 Impala SS autocrossing pics.
Me personally, I think the current Impys beat both the old 94-96 SSs and new ones. But back on the subject, I don't believe slightly bigger sway bars kill ride quality at all, so why not have them? The tires should have enough meat on them to handle them as well. Even if it is a 50$ bump on the price (hypothetical), just add it into the overall price and call it a day. I realize you can't do that with every part of a car, but jeesh, that thing looks like my sister's base cavalier would look like doing auto-x.
Re: '06 Impala SS autocrossing pics.
Yes, and most overglorify the SS badge.
I don't know when people are going to finally understand this???
SS DOES NOT MEAN RACECAR!!!
SS DOES NOT MEAN RACECAR!!!
SS DOES NOT MEAN RACECAR!!!
Now repeat 100 more times on the black board before you can go home...
Let's not get into what SS should and should not be. Let's live with what it IS!
I don't know when people are going to finally understand this???
SS DOES NOT MEAN RACECAR!!!
SS DOES NOT MEAN RACECAR!!!
SS DOES NOT MEAN RACECAR!!!
Now repeat 100 more times on the black board before you can go home...

Let's not get into what SS should and should not be. Let's live with what it IS!
Re: '06 Impala SS autocrossing pics.
Originally Posted by Chrome383Z
Yes, and most overglorify the SS badge.
I don't know when people are going to finally understand this???
SS DOES NOT MEAN RACECAR!!!
SS DOES NOT MEAN RACECAR!!!
SS DOES NOT MEAN RACECAR!!!
Now repeat 100 more times on the black board before you can go home...
Let's not get into what SS should and should not be. Let's live with what it IS!
I don't know when people are going to finally understand this???
SS DOES NOT MEAN RACECAR!!!
SS DOES NOT MEAN RACECAR!!!
SS DOES NOT MEAN RACECAR!!!
Now repeat 100 more times on the black board before you can go home...

Let's not get into what SS should and should not be. Let's live with what it IS!
RACE CAR = Z28 & Z06
Re: '06 Impala SS autocrossing pics.
Originally Posted by Chrome383Z
Yes, and most overglorify the SS badge.
I don't know when people are going to finally understand this???
SS DOES NOT MEAN RACECAR!!!
SS DOES NOT MEAN RACECAR!!!
SS DOES NOT MEAN RACECAR!!!
Now repeat 100 more times on the black board before you can go home...
Let's not get into what SS should and should not be. Let's live with what it IS!
I don't know when people are going to finally understand this???
SS DOES NOT MEAN RACECAR!!!
SS DOES NOT MEAN RACECAR!!!
SS DOES NOT MEAN RACECAR!!!
Now repeat 100 more times on the black board before you can go home...

Let's not get into what SS should and should not be. Let's live with what it IS!
First you spaz about SS not meaning racecar, but then say "let's not get into what SS should and should not be"? Then why is it on the car in the first place? Is it not meant to be considered? Just live with what is? If we just blindly followed along like good little sheep and just accepted everything, it'd be a pretty boring around here.
It can be a performance SPORTS sedan without being a race car. If they're going to put Super Sport on it, am I really asking too much that it be sporty in both appearance and performance? Or are my expectations too high? Perhaps yours too low?
Re: '06 Impala SS autocrossing pics.
Originally Posted by Eric Bryant
A lot of that comes from frustration over the fact that GM was too f*cking stupid to continue improving the breed, and instead decided to go compete with every other FWD wuss-sedan on the planet. It's that whole abandonment thing. You'd think that F-body owners might understand that.
I'll be interested in knowing if anyone gives a rat's *** about the new Impala SS 10 years from now.
Sorry for ranting, but anyone who thinks that GM is great for shoving a V8 into an FWD jellybean also has their head pretty far up their a**.
I'll be interested in knowing if anyone gives a rat's *** about the new Impala SS 10 years from now.
Sorry for ranting, but anyone who thinks that GM is great for shoving a V8 into an FWD jellybean also has their head pretty far up their a**.
I wonder how much money the RWD Impala SS made for GM?
I bet it is nothing compared to what they have made of the FWD Impala which has three shifts running to make it right now.
I really think the percieved market for high HP large RWD sedans is much lower than the actual market.
One peice of evidence is the Maruader, which fell flat on it's ***.
Another peice of evidence is that if you look at the sales of the most popluar large RWD sedan out there, Chrysler's 300..the Impala still blows it out the water in terms of sales...and most likely profit. The Impala name has traditionaly been on GM's bread and butter sedan's...which is what the FWD Impala is. That being said...those who want a large RWD sedan from Chevy will be happy in a few years
.
Re: '06 Impala SS autocrossing pics.
Originally Posted by Eric Bryant
A lot of that comes from frustration over the fact that GM was too f*cking stupid to continue improving the breed, and instead decided to go compete with every other FWD wuss-sedan on the planet. It's that whole abandonment thing. You'd think that F-body owners might understand that.
I'll be interested in knowing if anyone gives a rat's *** about the new Impala SS 10 years from now.
Sorry for ranting, but anyone who thinks that GM is great for shoving a V8 into an FWD jellybean also has their head pretty far up their a**.
I'll be interested in knowing if anyone gives a rat's *** about the new Impala SS 10 years from now.
Sorry for ranting, but anyone who thinks that GM is great for shoving a V8 into an FWD jellybean also has their head pretty far up their a**.
GM's crowning gift to mankind, the V8/full-size car combo, THRIVED for 40 years. I mean, from 1955-1996, how many 150/210/Belairs, Caprices, Impalas, etc etc, did they sell? Not even including the Pontiac, Buick, and Olds versions.
Then, in a brilliant show of typical GM bean-counting, they decided, "Oh, updating that would be hard. Lets play follow the leader with Toyhonissan."
A last year B-Body has it's share of issues, but can you imagine a current-platform (probably unibody), fullsize car, with an LS2 and one of those new-fangled 6speed autos, going head to head with that rounded-off turd? THAT would be an SS to be proud of.
Oh wait. The Aussies'll be getting them soon.
Re: '06 Impala SS autocrossing pics.
Originally Posted by formula79
I am surpised you take this view?
I wonder how much money the RWD Impala SS made for GM?
I bet it is nothing compared to what they have made of the FWD Impala which has three shifts running to make it right now.
I really think the percieved market for high HP large RWD sedans is much lower than the actual market.
One peice of evidence is the Maruader, which fell flat on it's ***.
Another peice of evidence is that if you look at the sales of the most popluar large RWD sedan out there, Chrysler's 300..the Impala still blows it out the water in terms of sales...and most likely profit. The Impala name has traditionaly been on GM's bread and butter sedan's...which is what the FWD Impala is. That being said...those who want a large RWD sedan from Chevy will be happy in a few years
.
I wonder how much money the RWD Impala SS made for GM?
I bet it is nothing compared to what they have made of the FWD Impala which has three shifts running to make it right now.
I really think the percieved market for high HP large RWD sedans is much lower than the actual market.
One peice of evidence is the Maruader, which fell flat on it's ***.
Another peice of evidence is that if you look at the sales of the most popluar large RWD sedan out there, Chrysler's 300..the Impala still blows it out the water in terms of sales...and most likely profit. The Impala name has traditionaly been on GM's bread and butter sedan's...which is what the FWD Impala is. That being said...those who want a large RWD sedan from Chevy will be happy in a few years
.I totally agree.
I think GM needs to have a RWD sedan in it's lineup (other than Cadillac), but it would have to be in addition to the FWD vehicles, and not as a replacement for them.
Re: '06 Impala SS autocrossing pics.
I agree with the real Impala SS guys. That thing just has no presense at all no matter what it can do, and of course, it drives the wrong wheels.
And yes. The SS name is really misunderstood.
And yes. The SS name is really misunderstood.
Last edited by IZ28; Jul 16, 2005 at 11:23 PM.
Re: '06 Impala SS autocrossing pics.
Well, I think it looks sorta cool in that last picture, where it's turning right and the left front is fully compressed.
I like the old B-bodies alot, but to tell you the truth, I never found their handling to be phenomenal. And even the SS didn't feel that fast to me either.
Sure, I wish the new Impala was alittle sportier, but I'll wait to drive one before passing judgement.
And what exactly is SS supposed to mean anyway? This SS will be the most powerful FWD car that you can buy. With a very sweet V8. Not enough? I mean, what's the cut off to qualify for an SS? A '70 LS-6 Chevelle maybe...which now must handle like a Corvette...and lemme guess....cost $22,000?
I like the old B-bodies alot, but to tell you the truth, I never found their handling to be phenomenal. And even the SS didn't feel that fast to me either.
Sure, I wish the new Impala was alittle sportier, but I'll wait to drive one before passing judgement.
And what exactly is SS supposed to mean anyway? This SS will be the most powerful FWD car that you can buy. With a very sweet V8. Not enough? I mean, what's the cut off to qualify for an SS? A '70 LS-6 Chevelle maybe...which now must handle like a Corvette...and lemme guess....cost $22,000?
Re: '06 Impala SS autocrossing pics.
Reminds me of a Cadillac Catera, especially the wheels
I couldn't find a pic of the wheels I saw on a Catera today, but they look EXACTLY like the SS wheels on the Impala, MC, and Cobalt. Except they were painted silver instead of chrome/polished. Maybe GM decided to save major money on design and tooling by using those leftover Catera castings.
I couldn't find a pic of the wheels I saw on a Catera today, but they look EXACTLY like the SS wheels on the Impala, MC, and Cobalt. Except they were painted silver instead of chrome/polished. Maybe GM decided to save major money on design and tooling by using those leftover Catera castings.
Re: '06 Impala SS autocrossing pics.
Originally Posted by Z284ever
And what exactly is SS supposed to mean anyway? This SS will be the most powerful FWD car that you can buy. With a very sweet V8. Not enough? I mean, what's the cut off to qualify for an SS? A '70 LS-6 Chevelle maybe...which now must handle like a Corvette...and lemme guess....cost $22,000?
The Impy SS will be the most powerful FWD car available, true. But honestly, I'd be happier with less power but more complete package. No, it doesn't have to run with a vette or an f body. But neither should it be a snooze inspiring weeble wobble.
Slapping a V8 on the front wheels and shoving it out the door does not a sports sedan make. To me anyway.
As for price, no, I wouldn't expect $22k.
So I probably don't understand SS after all and to be perfectly honest, I'd shop elsewhere for a performance sedan. Having that one strong point with the engine just isn't getting it for me.
Re: '06 Impala SS autocrossing pics.
Originally Posted by jkipp84
Slapping a V8 on the front wheels and shoving it out the door does not a sports sedan make. To me anyway.
And yes.....I know you've heard this before....but it really does looks better in person than in pictures.
We'll see.


