Why Does SLP not use Bilstein HD's?
Why Does SLP not use Bilstein HD's?
Y does slp not use Bilsteins that are properly valved for an fbody's ride height? Is it to make it ride alittle softer and nicer?
Is it so they can effectively use a 21mm sway bar in the rear?
Is it so they can effectively use a 21mm sway bar in the rear?
Re: Why Does SLP not use Bilstein HD's?
Originally posted by ZDriver96
Y does slp not use Bilsteins that are properly valved for an fbody's ride height?
Y does slp not use Bilsteins that are properly valved for an fbody's ride height?
Actually SLP Bilsteins have much less rebound damping but a little more compression damping than HD's. HD's stock do not have enough rebound dampening for stock 290ish front springs from my own experience. How SLP uses their settings for 300-450 lb/in springs is beyond me. Skip the SLP's and get a set of Bilstein HD's and have them re-valved by Strano for your specific use/style/setup. This is what I'm doing my Bilsteins are in CA as we speak.
Originally posted by Dr.Mudge
Bilstein B46-1913 front -Bump 159 Rebound 279
Bilstein/SLP B46-2071 front -Bump 130 Rebound 397
Bilstein B46-1913 front -Bump 159 Rebound 279
Bilstein/SLP B46-2071 front -Bump 130 Rebound 397
Opps got it backwards I should've double checked. Sorry.
Last edited by WOT; Feb 18, 2003 at 03:53 PM.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
tommalcolm
Computer Diagnostics and Tuning
2
Sep 11, 2015 03:39 PM



