http://www.cardomain.com/ride/2644681

Hmm... It's not the worst I've seen...

I wouldn't want it, but I'm having a hard time completely hating it. I hate hood and wing though.

 

Don't love it and don't hate it.Lose the wing and wheels and I could live with it.

 

For a semi-riced out Camaro, that doesn't look bad. The body kit is definitely unique.

 

The guy spends an EASY 10 grand (probably MUCH more) on body work, paint and lambo doors to make a Camaro the ricers' ultimate wet dream, but can't replace the crummy drum brakes on the rear? I didn't know any of the 4th gens had drum brakes, I thought they were all 4-wheel disc.

 

v6's are drum brakes, there not rare either lol

 

I really don't know what to think, it's a little too much for my taste it looks like a transmormer or something.

 

The front end's really not too bad looking. For a total replacement front bumper cover, I'd say that's the best I've seen.

 

I knew this was gonna be good when I saw "WTF" in the title.

 

I love it, I am going to do minez like dat

 

Is it just me or does that color look like it's kinda dark greenish/grayish? I don't know if it's really just black and my eyes are playing tricks on me or what.

 

I like the hood and the front ground effects, but the rear, and the lambo doors...not so much. Plus, there should be some different wheels on that car. That side view of the camaro makes the rear end look like an eclipse.

 

Typical ricer crap!!!!

 

Not all v6s had drums, my 95 3.8 had all discs.

 

3.4 V6's all had drums, I'm pretty sure. I know mine does.

 

There was an option package, which I think was available only for the 3.8s, that came with a limited slip diff, and disc brakes in the rear. I don't think too many vehicles were outfitted with that option, which is why you rarely see it. I'm not sure about the 98+ cars. I think all of them got discs, or am I on crack?