Advanced Tech Advanced tech discussion. Major rebuilds, engine theory, etc.
HIGH-END DISCUSSION ONLY - NOT FOR GENERAL TECH INFO

no load vs. high load

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Sep 20, 2006 | 12:19 PM
  #1  
number77's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 2,428
no load vs. high load

I've always thought that running an engine under no load at high RPM is alot worse. What are you guys' thoughts? This is for an engine which makes all its power under high RPMs.
I think of it as trying to hit a punching bag (load), and missing the bag (no load). To take the comparison further I've thought of idle as just shadow boxing, where no power is really being put out.

Last edited by number77; Sep 20, 2006 at 12:21 PM.
Old Sep 20, 2006 | 12:25 PM
  #2  
jerminator96's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 1,374
From: Raleigh, NC
Re: no load vs. high load

I have a friend who had some fast cars back in the 60's. He said he would always break in his vette's on a long straight road, running them up to redline in 3rd and 4th gear, then coasting back down while still in gear.

Of course, the materials everything was made out of were probably different from today, but he still said he would never rev the motor without a load
Old Sep 20, 2006 | 01:06 PM
  #3  
OldSStroker's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 2,931
From: Upstate NY
Re: no load vs. high load

Here's an interesting thread about this:

http://ls1tech.com/forums/showthread.php?t=556816
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
dbusch22
Forced Induction
6
Oct 31, 2016 11:09 AM
F'n1996Z28SS
Cars For Sale
0
Jun 3, 2015 09:39 AM
NewsBot
2010 - 2015 Camaro News, Sightings, Pictures, and Multimedia
0
Jan 29, 2015 07:10 PM
NewsBot
2010 - 2015 Camaro News, Sightings, Pictures, and Multimedia
0
Jan 11, 2015 06:10 PM
NewsBot
2010 - 2015 Camaro News, Sightings, Pictures, and Multimedia
0
Dec 28, 2014 06:20 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:49 PM.