Advanced Tech Advanced tech discussion. Major rebuilds, engine theory, etc.
HIGH-END DISCUSSION ONLY - NOT FOR GENERAL TECH INFO

Light weight sub-frame connectors

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jun 25, 2003 | 11:57 AM
  #1  
T/A man's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 1999
Posts: 51
From: canada
Light weight sub-frame connectors

I have a set of BMR boxed sub frame connectors bolted up to my 95 t/a and have always been kinda bothered by their weight. It’s not such a big deal since my engine’s a 396 but I’ve always wondered if a lighter set could be constructed. My question then is what materials would you recommend for making a light weight set of subframes? I’ve toyed with the idea of having a carbon fiber set made locally but reconsidered after the welding issue, even though I myself have only bolted the BMRs. What else could these be made with barring astronomically expensive space aged materials?
Old Jun 25, 2003 | 06:14 PM
  #2  
Mindgame's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 2,985
From: In a house by the bay
If you go with the tubular... they're a bit lighter. If you wanted to make your own and wanted lightweight, use 4130 chromoly (and a thinner tubing) and stay with the tubular design.

-Mindgame
Old Jun 25, 2003 | 06:24 PM
  #3  
LT1 1980 malibu's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 211
From: craplanta ga
Well carbon fiber would be nice But you dont want to ever put a jack on it ..Also it burns rather than welds..

Crhomemoly steel is a better choice but it has its own drawbacks..1st off it has to be tig welded onto the parent metal..It has a higher melting poinmt than mild steel to keep it simple. Also from a very rarely looked at standpoint, its not the best choice to connect two parts of a mild steel car together.With most aftermarket subframe connectors they become a 3rd member of the chassis..They are attached to the ends of the front and rear sections all the while the roof line and floor line are still working the same..On a few cars that ui have seen at some shop seminars there was actual cracking of the unit body from this..Depending on the type of structure it is said that the floor will fight the subframes and the roof during hard loading..In a street car this is a lot more than just stomping on the gas..You have road irregularities and stopping and turning just to name a few...A way to combat this is to build through the floor connectors. Made popular by a few Jersey stang bangers and proven on nitrous petes cars they seem to work best..I like this design myself as it actually makes a real true frame from the floor rails of teh car..Still your issue of weight isnt addressed..I must say that this is an area that a few lbs wont make that much a difference..Buy some bogarts instead of welds..A few lbs of unsprung weight 4 times less than sprug weight..

Albeit a far better metal than mild steel it is at the same time of different composition..Your trying to tie toegether two ends of a structure..The best way to due such with longjivity is to use the same mateirial..Now some may say (including myself) that its better for a cage or even a bar but thats a whole nother reinforcement metheod and thus another topic..Chromemoly can be of thinner wall thickness thus the lighter weight but on a streetcar i cant see it mattering that much to save about 5-8 lbs when comparing the two.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
carguy0119
2010 - 2015 Camaro Wheels, Tires, Brakes, Suspension
4
Apr 11, 2016 11:11 PM
Richardan15
Parts For Sale
2
May 30, 2015 08:36 AM
1963SS
Parts For Sale
1
Feb 6, 2015 10:05 AM
squarehead
General 1967-2002 F-Body Tech
7
Jan 15, 2015 07:02 PM
DubbyZ28Camaro
Car Audio and Electronics
2
Aug 4, 2002 12:53 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:57 PM.