Advanced Tech Advanced tech discussion. Major rebuilds, engine theory, etc.
HIGH-END DISCUSSION ONLY - NOT FOR GENERAL TECH INFO

Head gasket and piston-head clearance

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 13, 2003 | 04:51 PM
  #1  
menlatin's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 160
From: Denton,TX USA
Head gasket and piston-head clearance

Alright, ive got a 76cc head and an 11 cc dome. yes i know i should have gone with a 64 cc head and a flat top or small dome, but thats all i have so i've got to deal with what ive got. Right now, my deck height is .019 and i am wanting to use a .015 head gasket. = .034 piston-head clearance. Also , i am going to reshap my pisotns taking 2cc off them .Now my forged srp pistons call for .040 clearance. I want to wrap out to 6700rpm, and have 4340 rods, and a 5140 crank. Since im not going to wrap that far, is .006 going to make THAT big a deal, or is everything going to explode.
Old Jan 14, 2003 | 10:16 AM
  #2  
arnie's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 1,462
From: smog zone adjacent to a great lake
.040" has been considered a conservative safe minimum. Actually, quite conservative with steel rods that stretch very little in comparo to aluminum rods. You'll be fine. I (personally) consider (for you rev range) .025" a safe bare minimum with steel rods.
Old Jan 15, 2003 | 08:01 AM
  #3  
menlatin's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 160
From: Denton,TX USA
has anyone had any bad experiences using too thin a head gasket??
Old Jan 15, 2003 | 04:52 PM
  #4  
LT1Bunny's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 41
From: Charlotte, NC
I have and they blew on me within a month of nonhard driving.
Old Jan 15, 2003 | 06:16 PM
  #5  
Mindgame's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 2,985
From: In a house by the bay
That's a question that's not gonna get accurate answers. Sometimes you have a gasket failure and it's not always the gasket's fault.... the gasket is always going to get the blame though.
I've used em as thin as .025" without problems. Main thing is the deck surface/head surface flatness and finish. I'd say that they are paramount in the life of a gasket.

-Mindgame
Old Jan 16, 2003 | 02:12 AM
  #6  
menlatin's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 160
From: Denton,TX USA
well i was meaning like the piston touching the head.
Old Jan 16, 2003 | 05:13 PM
  #7  
bunker's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 4,305
From: North Vancouver, BC
Ohh if thats what you mean then don't worry at all, aslong as you have quench of any sort, it only gets higher with more heat with heads expansion.
Old Jan 16, 2003 | 07:24 PM
  #8  
Mindgame's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 2,985
From: In a house by the bay
As arnie said, anywhere from .035-.040 is very safe territory. It's not just about rod stretch though... piston rock is a factor in there too, and to a lesser degree, I'd say that crank torsion in really high power cars could be a significant factor.
Shorter piston skirts and tighter ring packs allow for a little more rock. Only a problem though when you start trying to go really tight, like less than .020. Seen guys do it (real tight) with the piston out of the hole but that's really pushing things, considering the bang (pardon the pun) for the buckage.

-Mindgame
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
dbusch22
Forced Induction
6
Oct 31, 2016 11:09 AM
HectorM52
Parts Wanted
2
Jan 10, 2015 09:01 PM
Jazsun
Cars For Sale
0
Dec 29, 2014 12:14 PM
thenewkid
New Member Introduction
5
Nov 27, 2014 09:41 AM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:34 AM.