Advanced Tech Advanced tech discussion. Major rebuilds, engine theory, etc.
HIGH-END DISCUSSION ONLY - NOT FOR GENERAL TECH INFO

Engine temps: what is considered "too hot" for efficiency?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old May 17, 2008 | 11:44 PM
  #31  
marshall93z's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 2,639
From: Mooresville, NC
LMAO @ cheeries and blueberries!
Old May 26, 2008 | 08:04 AM
  #32  
JP95ZM6's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 746
From: Rochester Hills, MI
Bob,

I know you specifically asked about engine temperature. Engine operating temp/efficiency aside, however, keep this in mind:

Blocking front openings for improved Cd provides a small reduction in energy spent to overcome aero drag. However, whenever the reduced opening area causes the fans to turn on instead of using 'free' ram air to do the job, the couple of hundred fan watts required will generally use more energy than you saved by aero improvement. So, you would get an improvement on sufficiently cool days/high speeds/low loads for the fan to stay off, but on warmer days/lower speeds/higher loads this would hurt fuel economy. Since you are now operating above the fan on temp, I suspect the fans are always on, so this mod is likely hurting your vehicle efficiency. Unless you raised the fan on temp accordingly.
Old Jun 1, 2008 | 10:16 PM
  #33  
Albone's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 22
From: Lowell, MA
I was driving through a blizzard in my wrx when I noticed my oil temp was 245+. This was way hotter than normal. The stock coolant temp showed just a little hotter/warmer than usual. It turned out my grill was clogged up with ice/snow. That car had a water to oil cooler.

Do you have an oil pressure gauge or light?

Also what mpgs are you getting? Did you actually see an improvement with the aero mods?
Old Jun 2, 2008 | 11:33 PM
  #34  
unstable bob's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 184
From: Wastelands of NJ
UPDATE: I didn't see any real earth shattering improvements w/ my grill blocks, so I removed my upper grill block to allow the car to run somewhat cooler than with the full upper and lower grill blocks. I think with my daily commute of speeds less that 60 MPH that the aerodynamic efficiency I was looking to achieve is kinda a moot point. I've gotten 34 MPG outa my last 2 tanks w/ mixed driving, so I really can't complain, considering that the car is rated for 25 MPG combined driving.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
cmdeshon
LT1 Based Engine Tech
16
Dec 27, 2014 10:06 AM
The Seer
Classic Engine Tech
2
Nov 26, 2014 05:55 PM
BIGCOWL-IMP
Midwest
0
Nov 21, 2014 09:40 AM
redzed
Automotive News / Industry / Future Vehicle Discussion
7
Sep 4, 2002 06:22 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:55 PM.