Advanced Tech Advanced tech discussion. Major rebuilds, engine theory, etc.
HIGH-END DISCUSSION ONLY - NOT FOR GENERAL TECH INFO

Dyno problems and A/F ratio question

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jul 27, 2003 | 04:19 PM
  #16  
97TA-WS6-Con's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 1,751
From: Surrey, BC, Can
Originally posted by brain
Curious, does the car have the same issue when accelerating on the street? Is the missfiring noticeable?
On the street, if feels like a misfire. The same hesitation you get from detonation.
Old Jul 27, 2003 | 04:27 PM
  #17  
97TA-WS6-Con's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 1,751
From: Surrey, BC, Can
Originally posted by NVMYZ28
Another thought:

I once mis adjusted a couple valve about 1/2 a turn too tight. This was causing the hydraulic lifter plungers to collapse in the upper RPM range. Car would pull, but had a definete miss to it.


I still suspect something is not right in your valve train.

What kind of lifters are you running? How many miles are on your springs/lifters? How close to coil bind are you at max lift?
For the record the springs are Crane 10308 anfd they are about 3 years old. I do not know what the lifters are.

Ellis: Actually I'm not sure I would agree that I have had this problem before. About 2 months ago I went to a dyno running NA. I did NOT get this same problem. I did suffer from a slight miss and found that my number 6 boot had burnt up on the header and thus attributed it to that. However, the car still pulled with a 'normal' curve all the way to 6200
Old Jul 27, 2003 | 11:44 PM
  #18  
97TA-WS6-Con's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 1,751
From: Surrey, BC, Can
Can someone tell me what they would estimate my timing should be with the following.

At WOT, 13# of boost, air temp 90 degrees. During this dyno I was at 22 degrees and I'm beginning to think that is too low. Would that timing level account for the stumble?
Old Jul 28, 2003 | 09:48 AM
  #19  
LT4POWR's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 586
From: Oklahoma City, OK
Originally posted by NVMYZ28
Another thought:

I once mis adjusted a couple valve about 1/2 a turn too tight. This was causing the hydraulic lifter plungers to collapse in the upper RPM range. Car would pull, but had a definete miss to it.

Same issue noted here. Now, it pulls hard to 7,000 rpm!!!
Old Jul 29, 2003 | 01:34 PM
  #20  
97TA-WS6-Con's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 1,751
From: Surrey, BC, Can
Well It MAY be a timing issue. I added some timing in above 5000 RPM and although I have only had one opportunity to to test it on the street, I did not have the stumble from before. That being said, I would like to test that result a few more times.

I then called the FAST folks and discussed my situation and they also suggested I had the timing excessively retarded. - I had 22 degrees at WOT and they say 24, even 26 degrees would be fine. Although he also recommended I add more fuel.

Unfortunately, the dyno operator did not think to mention that it might be excessive retard.

We shall see and I'll update when I know the solution.
Old Jul 29, 2003 | 04:01 PM
  #21  
IDOXLR8's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 1999
Posts: 2,784
From: Rochester Hills, MI
Are you running race fuel?? If so I currenlty have my timing set at 27 degrees. I am running 110 octane fuel though. My car was tuned with C-16 (116 octane) and I probably could have put another 2-3 degrees of timing in it but I did not want to run the car to the extreme.
Old Jul 29, 2003 | 07:36 PM
  #22  
97TA-WS6-Con's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 1,751
From: Surrey, BC, Can
So 24-25 is about as much as I will want to go on 94 Octane. DO you know your intake temperatures? Mine are about 90 and I see you have a similar set up to mine - bigger blower of course
Old Jul 30, 2003 | 11:30 AM
  #23  
IDOXLR8's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 1999
Posts: 2,784
From: Rochester Hills, MI
My inlet temperature were pretty high. I believe they were around 140 or so. I would think you could get away with running 24 degrees of timing safely.
Old Jul 30, 2003 | 12:54 PM
  #24  
97TA-WS6-Con's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 1,751
From: Surrey, BC, Can
Another question. You high boost blower and turbo guys. What spark gap are you at?

I'm at 35 thou and it has been suggested that a narrower gap might help, that the drop off in power is from the spark being blown out.

Any thoughts? Any negative to going to 25 thou for example?

Last edited by 97TA-WS6-Con; Jul 30, 2003 at 12:59 PM.
Old Jul 30, 2003 | 01:57 PM
  #25  
IDOXLR8's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 1999
Posts: 2,784
From: Rochester Hills, MI
I am running my plugs gapped at .032.
Old Aug 1, 2003 | 11:38 PM
  #26  
CSJTA's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: May 1999
Posts: 274
From: Rich, Va.
One more suggestion, I would move your corection factors back up. You say you have them at 5 percent, so that means the FAST can only correct 5 percent either way. I would move them back up to 25 percent to see what happens. Just a thought.
Old Aug 2, 2003 | 01:06 AM
  #27  
97TA-WS6-Con's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 1,751
From: Surrey, BC, Can
Actualy I have that the FAST can remove up to 5% but can ADD up to 25%. I heard that was a cautious way of tuning things.
Old Aug 3, 2003 | 08:35 PM
  #28  
97TA-WS6-Con's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 1,751
From: Surrey, BC, Can
I don't know if I alrerady mentioned this but the rimgs did not seat in the new motor and it burns oil. I pulled the plugs and they are are fouled. I put new plugs in and FOR THE MOMENT, that appears to have solved the issue. However, it has only been a few days and I'll see if the problem returns quickly.
Old Aug 6, 2003 | 07:14 AM
  #29  
WS6 TA's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 520
From: MD
Heh, I’m a bunch behind in my ‘reading’ but was going to suggest that you play with more timing advance or smaller plug gaps. FWIW, I’ve had to run as small as .022” gaps on a few boosted applications (lots of rpm + lots of boost = hard to prevent misfires without really small gaps) and never saw any real problems. I have seen tests that indicate that as your plug gaps get smaller the plugs run slightly hotter, but we’re not even talking the same difference as if you went with a one step hotter plug.
Old Aug 6, 2003 | 08:54 AM
  #30  
97TA-WS6-Con's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 1,751
From: Surrey, BC, Can
Thanks Mark

Actually, making the gap smaller was also on my "plan of attack". For the moment the new plugs at 35 thou seem OK.



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:49 PM.