This diameter tube flows how much?
This diameter tube flows how much?
Is there a chart that shows the different diameter tubes and how much cfm flows through em? I know, cfm can change with the velocity, but, like a general idea I guess? Thanks!
SKeTchy
SKeTchy
CFM can also change with the pressure differential. Fer' instance, heads are usually flowed at a vacuum level of 28" of water. 4bbl carbs are flowed at vacuum level of 1.5" of Hg (Mercury) which is about 3" of water. Don't quote me on that conversion rate. I don't recall the conversion rate from H2O vacuum to Hg vacuum but I think it's about 2:1 or thereabouts. Of course, I'm talking VACUUM here- pressure below atmosperic, not in situations where you're seeing boost (pressure above atmospheric).
There are formulas that you can figure the CFM regardless of what the pressures (or lack thereof) are on either side of the tube. I'm sure somebody would be happy to post them.
Actually, I don't mean to hijack this thread, but I'd like to know what the conversion rate H2O->Hg actually is.
There are formulas that you can figure the CFM regardless of what the pressures (or lack thereof) are on either side of the tube. I'm sure somebody would be happy to post them.
Actually, I don't mean to hijack this thread, but I'd like to know what the conversion rate H2O->Hg actually is.
Air density does not have much impact on volume flow (cfm). Pressure differential, shape, surface finish and the length of the passage all do. If you’re comparing things like throttle bodies, 4bbl carbs (2bbl and smaller are rated at a different pressure differential), exhaust… you can usually get a usable approximation using something in the range of 122cfm/in^2
Originally posted by Damon
CFM can also change with the pressure differential. Fer' instance, heads are usually flowed at a vacuum level of 28" of water. 4bbl carbs are flowed at vacuum level of 1.5" of Hg (Mercury) which is about 3" of water. Don't quote me on that conversion rate.
Actually 1.5 in. Hg. is about 20.4 in. H2O.
An unrestricted engine will often show about 1 psi manifold vacuum at max power, which is about 27.7 in. H2O. That may be why 28 in. H2O was chosen for flow benches.
I don't recall the conversion rate from H2O vacuum to Hg vacuum but I think it's about 2:1 or thereabouts. Of course, I'm talking VACUUM here- pressure below atmosperic, not in situations where you're seeing boost (pressure above atmospheric).
Isn't pressure and vacuum measured in the same units? The conversion is 1 in Hg = 13.61 in. H2O. 1 psi = 2.036 in. Hg. Maybe that's what you meant?
There are formulas that you can figure the CFM regardless of what the pressures (or lack thereof) are on either side of the tube. I'm sure somebody would be happy to post them.
Actually, I don't mean to hijack this thread, but I'd like to know what the conversion rate H2O->Hg actually is.
CFM can also change with the pressure differential. Fer' instance, heads are usually flowed at a vacuum level of 28" of water. 4bbl carbs are flowed at vacuum level of 1.5" of Hg (Mercury) which is about 3" of water. Don't quote me on that conversion rate.
Actually 1.5 in. Hg. is about 20.4 in. H2O.
An unrestricted engine will often show about 1 psi manifold vacuum at max power, which is about 27.7 in. H2O. That may be why 28 in. H2O was chosen for flow benches.
I don't recall the conversion rate from H2O vacuum to Hg vacuum but I think it's about 2:1 or thereabouts. Of course, I'm talking VACUUM here- pressure below atmosperic, not in situations where you're seeing boost (pressure above atmospheric).
Isn't pressure and vacuum measured in the same units? The conversion is 1 in Hg = 13.61 in. H2O. 1 psi = 2.036 in. Hg. Maybe that's what you meant?
There are formulas that you can figure the CFM regardless of what the pressures (or lack thereof) are on either side of the tube. I'm sure somebody would be happy to post them.
Actually, I don't mean to hijack this thread, but I'd like to know what the conversion rate H2O->Hg actually is.
My $.02
Originally posted by WS6 TA
122cfm/in^2
122cfm/in^2
SKeTchy
just some random thoughts,...
in terms of constant flow, i guess inside area would be a good way to approximate the flow potential of a tube. however, in an ic engine, the flow is never constant (and quite often is reciprocating) and this means you need to get into resonant theory to calculate at what point flow in the tube becomes optimized and then you can calculate the approximate flow potential of the tube.
flow numbers (cylinder heads, carbs, etc.,...) are measured using constant flow, and therefore should be used as basis of comparison not as an absolute measure of maximum flow potential.
in terms of constant flow, i guess inside area would be a good way to approximate the flow potential of a tube. however, in an ic engine, the flow is never constant (and quite often is reciprocating) and this means you need to get into resonant theory to calculate at what point flow in the tube becomes optimized and then you can calculate the approximate flow potential of the tube.
flow numbers (cylinder heads, carbs, etc.,...) are measured using constant flow, and therefore should be used as basis of comparison not as an absolute measure of maximum flow potential.
Originally posted by WS6 TA
d= diameter
a= area
PI= 3.14
a= ((d/2)^2)*PI
cfm = a*122
or
cfm = (((d/2)^2)*PI)*122
d= diameter
a= area
PI= 3.14
a= ((d/2)^2)*PI
cfm = a*122
or
cfm = (((d/2)^2)*PI)*122
SKeTchy
It won't change, he's just talking about the effectiveness of that volume of air filling something if it has to stop and start. Most engine parts have to deal with that, so this will flow the same as any other part put in the same place (I have no idea of what you're doing...)
Originally posted by WS6 TA
It won't change, he's just talking about the effectiveness of that volume of air filling something if it has to stop and start. Most engine parts have to deal with that, so this will flow the same as any other part put in the same place (I have no idea of what you're doing...)
It won't change, he's just talking about the effectiveness of that volume of air filling something if it has to stop and start. Most engine parts have to deal with that, so this will flow the same as any other part put in the same place (I have no idea of what you're doing...)

Giving too much thought to a CAI
SKeTchy
SStroker- thanks for clearing that up. Like I often say at work: "man, I was WAY off on that." People love me at work, and you can probably tell why. Glad I'm in sales, not engineering or accounting.
Appreciated. That'll go in the old memory banks. 14:1 conversion. Not 2:1. Heh heh. I was only off by what? 7 times? That's pretty close, right?
Appreciated. That'll go in the old memory banks. 14:1 conversion. Not 2:1. Heh heh. I was only off by what? 7 times? That's pretty close, right?
Originally posted by KwikistZ

Giving too much thought to a CAI
SKeTchy

Giving too much thought to a CAI
SKeTchy
What do you have the 4.3 in? What are you plans?


