Cam question for Blown Stroker Application
Thread Starter
Registered User
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 153
From: Indy, IN. USA
Cam question for Blown Stroker Application
Did any of you run into any problems with the rods interferring with the base circle of your cam? I've never read anything saying they had that problem, but the guy at Indy Cylinder Head said sometimes it is an issue. I will be using a Lunati Forged crank, 6" Lunati H-Beam Rods, Forger Lunati pistons, and a Lunati cam. Speaking of cams does anyone else use a Lunati cam in a similar application, and if so what one (specs)? Thanks in advance for your help!
------------------
94 Z, Vortech S-Trim, White, SS Hood, Flowmaster Exhaust, Edelbrock Headers, Throttle Body, & Torque Arm, Lakewood Trailing Arms, and adjustable Panhard Bar, Crane 1.6 RR, LOTS OF OTHER STUFF.
Currently in the paint shop recieving new Ground Effects, new White Paint w/ Viper GTS Blue Stripes.
Coming Soon - 383 w/ all forged bottom end, AFR heads, etc. Machine work and Porting & Polishing being done by Indy Cylinder Head.
------------------
94 Z, Vortech S-Trim, White, SS Hood, Flowmaster Exhaust, Edelbrock Headers, Throttle Body, & Torque Arm, Lakewood Trailing Arms, and adjustable Panhard Bar, Crane 1.6 RR, LOTS OF OTHER STUFF.
Currently in the paint shop recieving new Ground Effects, new White Paint w/ Viper GTS Blue Stripes.
Coming Soon - 383 w/ all forged bottom end, AFR heads, etc. Machine work and Porting & Polishing being done by Indy Cylinder Head.
Registered User
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 240
From: Lincoln, NE
When you run a long stroke crankshaft and aftermarket rods that are beefier than stock, chances are they will come very close to the cam lobes and can sometimes hit. You can relieve some metal off the sides of the rods or go with a smaller base circle cam for more clearance.
On the camshaft you are going to want less overlap than a N/A engine. This means an LSA of 114-116 would be optimal rather than your usual 110 or 112, to prevent blowing your boosted air charge out the exhaust valves.
------------------
1983 Monte Carlo, 307 Stroker, TH350, 3.73 10-Bolt - SOLD 8/19/02
Future F-Body Owner
[This message has been edited by BlackHawk T/A (edited September 06, 2002).]
On the camshaft you are going to want less overlap than a N/A engine. This means an LSA of 114-116 would be optimal rather than your usual 110 or 112, to prevent blowing your boosted air charge out the exhaust valves.
------------------
1983 Monte Carlo, 307 Stroker, TH350, 3.73 10-Bolt - SOLD 8/19/02
Future F-Body Owner
[This message has been edited by BlackHawk T/A (edited September 06, 2002).]
Thread Starter
Registered User
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 153
From: Indy, IN. USA
Thanks! I heard that on hydraulic roller applications you can't use a smaller base circle cam. Really what I need to know is when you all built your engines if you did have to modify (grind) the big end of the rod because of interference.
Registered User
Joined: Dec 1969
Posts: 1,147
From: Phila., PA
The base circle won't interfere. There are certain LOBES that MAY interfere with the rods near the rod bolt heads depending on your exact combination of cam and rods. My experience is with 383s (3.75" stroke). If you have a lot more stroke you might have interferece with the base circle, but I haven't heard of it.
[This message has been edited by Damon (edited September 07, 2002).]
[This message has been edited by Damon (edited September 07, 2002).]
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
dbusch22
Forced Induction
6
Oct 31, 2016 11:09 AM
squirrels
Site Help and Suggestions
4
Jul 13, 2002 01:58 AM