Advanced Tech Advanced tech discussion. Major rebuilds, engine theory, etc.
HIGH-END DISCUSSION ONLY - NOT FOR GENERAL TECH INFO

Is 475-500 rwhp NA possible with an LT4 intake?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 18, 2005 | 07:45 PM
  #16  
Z284thgen's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 490
From: tulsa ok
Re: Is 475-500 rwhp NA possible with an LT4 intake?

Originally Posted by got_hp?
from ed's post


My '96 TA made 474hp & 435tq. It's an NA 383", 4L60E & 4.30 Moser 12 bolt.
Best times so far 10.26 @ 131.72 1.312 60', at 600' DA

Those numbers are rear wheel, with a stock unlocked converter. 93 octane pump gas. Torque always looks stupid-high with the race converter in it. Wanted to know what it actually was, and at what RPM it peaked, so John & I put it on the dyno with the stock converter installed for initial run in & tuning. Easy to do when the dyno & lift are sitting right there. Rolled it back forward to the lift after baseline tuning it, and John put the race converter in it.

The heads are just GM LT4 head & intake castings ported by Pete Incado @ CNC Cylinder Heads, down in Florida. Nothing special, just his normal deal. Wish you could put big valves in them. Kinda looking at some other options right now.

Take care, Ed
yeah i knew all that but what i meant is i dont know what all might have been done to the intake and heads if there was anything other then P&P
Old Jan 18, 2005 | 08:55 PM
  #17  
OneFlyn95z28's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 1969
Posts: 1,431
From: Pacific North West
Re: Is 475-500 rwhp NA possible with an LT4 intake?

Sorry I must have miss under stood him when I talked to him a few weeks ago. I checked the E-mail I got from him and yes those are the ocrrect number.

Again Sorry for being a tenth off.

I have a pretty good Idea what has been done to his intake
Old Jan 18, 2005 | 10:05 PM
  #18  
Black95Form's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 648
From: Richardson, TX USA
Re: Is 475-500 rwhp NA possible with an LT4 intake?

OK Ellis, spill the beans, what did he do to the intake.

Michael
Old Jan 18, 2005 | 10:13 PM
  #19  
Rob(94Hawk#319)'s Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 1999
Posts: 128
From: San Diego, CA
Re: Is 475-500 rwhp NA possible with an LT4 intake?

Could we possibly fit a Kinsler Fuel Injection type setup? I doubt it with our cowls, but we might be able to use shorter trumpets....
Old Jan 21, 2005 | 05:37 PM
  #20  
Denny McLain's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 752
From: Double Oak TX
Re: Is 475-500 rwhp NA possible with an LT4 intake?

Has anyone on this list have any experience with sheet metal intakes? I'm thinking this my be my next major move mostly to get an air gap to cut down on heat soak.
Old Jan 21, 2005 | 05:53 PM
  #21  
taner's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 1998
Posts: 2,407
From: Windsor, Canada: Home of the FASTEST LT1 & LS1 6 spds :)
Re: Is 475-500 rwhp NA possible with an LT4 intake?

Originally Posted by Denny McLain
Has anyone on this list have any experience with sheet metal intakes? I'm thinking this my be my next major move mostly to get an air gap to cut down on heat soak.
i think a cost effective way to achieve this is achieve is a victor jr converted. alot cheaper than a sheet metal intake.
Old Jan 21, 2005 | 06:41 PM
  #22  
SStrokerAce's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 6,518
Re: Is 475-500 rwhp NA possible with an LT4 intake?

Originally Posted by taner
i think a cost effective way to achieve this is achieve is a victor jr converted. alot cheaper than a sheet metal intake.
A Vic Jr is not the right way to go there. Bad port sizing for most of the motors that would run them, they are nearly impossible to convert to the LT1 bolt pattern on the center bolts and a Super Vic far exceeds them in runner length and keeping the runners equal in length. A single plane is a bunch cheaper than a Sheetmetal intake.

Bret
Old Jan 21, 2005 | 10:22 PM
  #23  
Denny McLain's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 752
From: Double Oak TX
Re: Is 475-500 rwhp NA possible with an LT4 intake?

Originally Posted by taner
i think a cost effective way to achieve this is achieve is a victor jr converted. alot cheaper than a sheet metal intake.
I'm thinking more along the lines of highest hp still using the stock computer and aftermarket stock appearing Tb.

Again in my experience, heat soak on LTx engines is a real issue. I've seen sheet metal intakes on Ltx engines but have no clue as to the hp gains or if they’re OBDII compatible so it will pass emissions. (Street racing is still my favorite….. Ya I know, shame, shame, shame on me)

More interested in making power than going cheap.
Old Jan 22, 2005 | 08:53 AM
  #24  
taner's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 1998
Posts: 2,407
From: Windsor, Canada: Home of the FASTEST LT1 & LS1 6 spds :)
Re: Is 475-500 rwhp NA possible with an LT4 intake?

Originally Posted by SStrokerAce
A Vic Jr is not the right way to go there. Bad port sizing for most of the motors that would run them, they are nearly impossible to convert to the LT1 bolt pattern on the center bolts and a Super Vic far exceeds them in runner length and keeping the runners equal in length. A single plane is a bunch cheaper than a Sheetmetal intake.

Bret
ooops i meant to say super vic jr, i guess not everyone can read my mind

sorry!

denny,

i will let you know come spring time how well the sheet metal intake works
Old Jan 22, 2005 | 09:47 AM
  #25  
Damon's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 1969
Posts: 1,147
From: Phila., PA
Re: Is 475-500 rwhp NA possible with an LT4 intake?

I don't think there's such an animal as a Super Vic Jr.

Super Victor or Victor Jr., that's it. Then about 5 million different versions of each to satisfy just about any application using any kinda head you can think of for a SBC.
Old Jan 22, 2005 | 04:36 PM
  #26  
chevyguy3's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2000
Posts: 756
From: Indiana
Re: Is 475-500 rwhp NA possible with an LT4 intake?

definitly doable. not sure what rwhp i was making, but at 3500lbs i ran a 10.46 @ 128 NA with an LT4 intake that just had the throttle blade openings enlarged, and i just ported the runners a little to match the heads (light ported LT4s). with tuning im sure it would have gone much faster
Old Jan 22, 2005 | 09:28 PM
  #27  
ATEBYASNAKE's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 459
Re: Is 475-500 rwhp NA possible with an LT4 intake?

Is anyone makin 475rwhp or more through Hydraulic roller. I know alot are solid... but are any doin it hydraulic? Thanks
Old Jan 23, 2005 | 08:05 AM
  #28  
Denny McLain's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 752
From: Double Oak TX
Re: Is 475-500 rwhp NA possible with an LT4 intake?

Originally Posted by ATEBYASNAKE
Is anyone makin 475rwhp or more through Hydraulic roller. I know alot are solid... but are any doin it hydraulic? Thanks

This is where I get to say......... give me a few weeks and I'll tell ya.

I seriously doubt I can as I'm trying to keep it street drivable but that's why I'm looking into Hogan intakes and such.
Old Jan 29, 2005 | 11:17 AM
  #29  
Mindgame's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 2,985
From: In a house by the bay
Re: Is 475-500 rwhp NA possible with an LT4 intake?

Originally Posted by ATEBYASNAKE
Is anyone makin 475rwhp or more through Hydraulic roller. I know alot are solid... but are any doin it hydraulic? Thanks
Yes, I know of a 355 LT4 that will make close to 500 at the rear wheels using a mild hydraulic, AFR 215RR heads and a custom CFE intake. This one is much more than a pile of parts though... and of course, may be irrelevent when you factor in the intake.

Can be done and made streetable... but not cheaply unless you want to throw a lot of cam at it. Always a trade off...

-Mindgame
Old Jan 29, 2005 | 02:34 PM
  #30  
WS6 TA's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 520
From: MD
Re: Is 475-500 rwhp NA possible with an LT4 intake?

Originally Posted by ATEBYASNAKE
Is anyone makin 475rwhp or more through Hydraulic roller. I know alot are solid... but are any doin it hydraulic? Thanks
Is it possible? Sure. Is it likely? Not unless you know more then 99% of people on this board and/or have more money to spend on it then most of us. Of course, why not take the easy way out and go mechanical roller?

Some quick numbers to play with:
To be safe 475rwhp = ~570bhp
At 100% VE a 350 will have to be spinning about 7500rpm to do it (figure, for most people’s setups this could be lightly optimistic and you might have to turn a few hundred more rpm)
You’ll need over 275cfm intake port flow at at least 20% under your peak lift
You’ll need a cam that will give you peak hp around 7500rpm and a valve train that will be reliable to 8K

At that point, to get a HR setup to live you’re talking about using every trick in the book, light valves, retainers…, rev kit, trick valve springs… you’re at the point that it will be difficult to do it without heads that will require offset rockers…

All of this gets much easier/cheaper if you just suck it up and live with adjusting valve lash once in a while. OTOH, you won’t save money on the short block unless you spend the $$$ for a bigger displacement so you don’t have to wind it up as tight, but even something like a 396 will want >6750rpm to get into this range.



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:16 PM.