3rd Gen / L98 Engine Tech 1982 - 1992 Engine Related

is this true?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Nov 10, 2003 | 10:40 AM
  #1  
Z28James's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 341
From: Jacksonville, Florida
is this true?




Look at that...15.2s quarter mile. Seems fishy
Old Nov 10, 2003 | 11:37 AM
  #2  
85_LG4
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Seems about right, but I am unsure.
Old Nov 10, 2003 | 03:42 PM
  #3  
Z28SORR's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 3,768
From: Friendswood, TX, USA
Yes, it is absolutely true. Except maybe the 15's in the quarter. I was only able to get into the 16's. What part do you not believe?
Old Nov 10, 2003 | 04:05 PM
  #4  
KnightRider350's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 355
From: Madison, WI
mine with same engine ran in the low 16's, but it was also a half-baked motor with six digits worth of miles on it. Its accurate.
Old Nov 10, 2003 | 05:14 PM
  #5  
Marc 85Z28's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 1999
Posts: 2,022
From: MD
Fishy? You do realize that's not the standard LG4 155HP slug right? That is the "High Output" version of the LG4, the L69. And considering they were rated at 190HP - which BTW IMO is underrated by about 10-15HP, had a manual trans with 3.73 gears, the 15.2 is quite believable. I've seen mag tests as low as 14.9 for those cars.
Old Nov 10, 2003 | 06:08 PM
  #6  
Z28James's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 341
From: Jacksonville, Florida
Its just that I see people with modded up cars only pullin 15.5s, didnt think that car stock would be close to breaking into the 14s.
Old Nov 10, 2003 | 06:10 PM
  #7  
kevin 2.8's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 718
From: ONTARIO CANADA
those people you see are driving cars 15 years older than the one in the picture
Old Nov 10, 2003 | 11:14 PM
  #8  
whoa guy's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 113
From: charlotte, nc
baaaaaaaaaaa....... 190hp. damn 80s cars.

sorry...
Old Nov 11, 2003 | 08:39 AM
  #9  
90rocz's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 1999
Posts: 2,947
From: Springfield,OH. U.S.A.
That's about ringht for the 305/5spd Z, 190 was a little underrated tho. The Tpi came out the year and they got into the 14's, My cousins ran high 14's with the 305 A4, which with the 700r4 seemed to be faster than the 5spd cars b/c of the gearing, 3.06 vs 2.95 plus the rear gears and virtually NO shift lag. That was the big thing I remember when he got his, the FIRM / POSITIVE upshifts.
Old Nov 16, 2003 | 04:51 PM
  #10  
PearlWhiteZ28's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 33
From: Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
The '84 was the last full year carburated. The GM rated horsepower wasn't improved upon until they put out the 350 with the IROC in '86 or '87.

That was a really awsome picture by the way, anyone know of anymore like it? Where could I look?
Old Nov 16, 2003 | 04:59 PM
  #11  
krazzycowgirl's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 2,446
From: Yelm, Wa USA
87 Was the first year of the 350
Old Nov 16, 2003 | 06:14 PM
  #12  
KnightRider350's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 355
From: Madison, WI
www.thirdgen.org has a ton of those old ads. I looked up some on my own...I have roughly 80 thirdgen newspaper ads, etc. Message me on AIM if you'd like me to send them to you. HardFibre's the SN.

Peace.
Old Nov 16, 2003 | 06:22 PM
  #13  
mrr23's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 1,151
From: orlando,florida,usa
Originally posted by PearlWhiteZ28
The '84 was the last full year carburated. The GM rated horsepower wasn't improved upon until they put out the 350 with the IROC in '86 or '87.

That was a really awsome picture by the way, anyone know of anymore like it? Where could I look?
1987 was the last year of the carbureted engine.
Old Nov 16, 2003 | 06:40 PM
  #14  
krazzycowgirl's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 2,446
From: Yelm, Wa USA
Originally posted by mrr23
1987 was the last year of the carbureted engine.
Yeppers the Lg4 was the 4bc in 87
Old Nov 16, 2003 | 06:54 PM
  #15  
RobsWS6's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 1999
Posts: 466
From: Diamondhead, MS
15.2 is what GM claimed in the 84 brochure. Some were faster, some slower. Mine ran right about there back then when it was stock.



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:15 AM.