3rd Gen / L98 Engine Tech 1982 - 1992 Engine Related

Somebody please back me up when I say that L98's had 245 hp?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Mar 5, 2005 | 01:04 PM
  #1  
85_305's Avatar
Thread Starter
Banned
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 1,610
From: Holland, NY
Somebody please back me up when I say that L98's had 245 hp?

Somebody in the Track Kills section is claiming that NO 3rd gen EVER put down 245hp and 340lb's of torque. He is asking for a dyno-slip, but why the HELL would I have a dyno slip saved on my computer? Can anyone here help me out?
Old Mar 5, 2005 | 02:20 PM
  #2  
LS1Z28's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 1998
Posts: 83
From: Lake Elsinore, CA
Re: Somebody please back me up when I say that L98's had 245 hp?

The factory rating for the L98 was 245hp with 345 ftlbs of torque.
Old Mar 5, 2005 | 02:23 PM
  #3  
Willie's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 312
From: Tucson, Arizona USA
Re: Somebody please back me up when I say that L98's had 245 hp?

The factory rating for the L98 was 245hp with 345 ftlbs of torque.

.... but only from 1990 thru 1992. The rating was lowest in 1987 at 225hp when it was introduced. It was 230hp from 1988 & 1989.
Old Mar 5, 2005 | 02:28 PM
  #4  
85_305's Avatar
Thread Starter
Banned
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 1,610
From: Holland, NY
Re: Somebody please back me up when I say that L98's had 245 hp?

That is what i have heard. Some guy is trying to tell me that they only dyno at 200-215hp, and like 380lb's (I am talking about a '92)
Old Mar 5, 2005 | 02:35 PM
  #5  
Willie's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 312
From: Tucson, Arizona USA
Re: Somebody please back me up when I say that L98's had 245 hp?

Some guy is trying to tell me that they only dyno at 200-215hp, and like 380lb's (I am talking about a '92)

That seems realistic. Take 15 percent drivetrain loss and that 245hp at the crank becomes ~210 at the wheels. The factory ratings are at the crank with certain accessories (I'm not sure which) running.

Willie
Old Mar 5, 2005 | 02:46 PM
  #6  
85_305's Avatar
Thread Starter
Banned
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 1,610
From: Holland, NY
Re: Somebody please back me up when I say that L98's had 245 hp?

^Ahh.. ok. Hm.. sonovabitch I was wrong, lol.
Old Mar 5, 2005 | 03:18 PM
  #7  
roguedriver's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 1,194
From: Albuquerque, NM.
Re: Somebody please back me up when I say that L98's had 245 hp?

88's and 89's had 235hp in the 350. In 89 you could get the dual cat option though which upped it to 245hp. 90-92 had 255hp.

Ken R.
Old Mar 5, 2005 | 05:23 PM
  #8  
krazzycowgirl's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 2,446
From: Yelm, Wa USA
Re: Somebody please back me up when I say that L98's had 245 hp?

Originally Posted by 85_305
^Ahh.. ok. Hm.. sonovabitch I was wrong, lol.
Listen to Willie He knows.
Old Mar 5, 2005 | 05:37 PM
  #9  
Willie's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 312
From: Tucson, Arizona USA
Re: Somebody please back me up when I say that L98's had 245 hp?

88's and 89's had 235hp in the 350. In 89 you could get the dual cat option though which upped it to 245hp. 90-92 had 255hp.

According to the Camaro White Book, the 1988 - 89 350 TPI was rated at 230hp. I do not know if this spec holds true for Firebirds. In 1989, the dual cat option upped this to 240hp.

The 1990-92 was never rated any higher than 245hp. Ken, can you cite the reference where you get your figures?

Willie
Old Mar 6, 2005 | 09:50 AM
  #10  
roguedriver's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 1,194
From: Albuquerque, NM.
Re: Somebody please back me up when I say that L98's had 245 hp?

My bad. It was 230 single cat/240 dual cat. Got messed up on the 5hp. And the later years at 245.
Old Mar 7, 2005 | 04:55 PM
  #11  
85_305's Avatar
Thread Starter
Banned
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 1,610
From: Holland, NY
Re: Somebody please back me up when I say that L98's had 245 hp?

245 at the WHEELS though?
Old Mar 8, 2005 | 05:08 AM
  #12  
swisscheese's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 153
From: somewhere over the pond
Re: Somebody please back me up when I say that L98's had 245 hp?

Originally Posted by 85_305
245 at the WHEELS though?
Yeah, at the flywheel(s)...


Prob. 200+hp at the wheels
Old Mar 8, 2005 | 09:43 AM
  #13  
Doc99SS's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 75
From: Monroe, Michigan
Re: Somebody please back me up when I say that L98's had 245 hp?

When my '87 IROCZ with an L98 TPI engine was stock, it would not even dyno at 200, I think it dynoed at 185RWHp.
Willie is correct about his numbers above.
Old Mar 8, 2005 | 07:08 PM
  #14  
85_305's Avatar
Thread Starter
Banned
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 1,610
From: Holland, NY
Re: Somebody please back me up when I say that L98's had 245 hp?

What would an LG4 dyno at at the rear wheels?
Old Mar 8, 2005 | 08:28 PM
  #15  
87DJP2001's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 1,790
From: Florida. USA
Re: Somebody please back me up when I say that L98's had 245 hp?

Originally Posted by 85_305
What would an LG4 dyno at at the rear wheels?
Well stock was 155 Hp so RWHP would be about 130 HP



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:59 PM.