Losing to Civcs, need help fast
Edelbrock makes the secondary rods for way cheaper that gm sells them for. Here are part numbers from www.summitracing.com:
EDL-1952 CK rods(pair) $6.99 (this rod is similiar to the DR)
EDL-1951 CE rods(pair) $6.99 (this one is richer than the CK)
EDL-1960 B-hanger $2.99 (they have several others for same price.)
These are made to fit right in the Rochester Q-jet
EDL-1952 CK rods(pair) $6.99 (this rod is similiar to the DR)
EDL-1951 CE rods(pair) $6.99 (this one is richer than the CK)
EDL-1960 B-hanger $2.99 (they have several others for same price.)
These are made to fit right in the Rochester Q-jet
I've used the CK rods. So have several other people I know with QJets. And in every application they ran way rich, blowing all sorts of black smoke out on WOT. Almost all those were on mildly built 350s, so I can only imagine what it would do on a near stock 305.
And by the time you pay for handling charges through Summit, it costs the same amount anyway
And by the time you pay for handling charges through Summit, it costs the same amount anyway
Originally posted by Marc 85Z28
I've used the CK rods. So have several other people I know with QJets. And in every application they ran way rich, blowing all sorts of black smoke out on WOT. Almost all those were on mildly built 350s, so I can only imagine what it would do on a near stock 305.
And by the time you pay for handling charges through Summit, it costs the same amount anyway
I've used the CK rods. So have several other people I know with QJets. And in every application they ran way rich, blowing all sorts of black smoke out on WOT. Almost all those were on mildly built 350s, so I can only imagine what it would do on a near stock 305.
And by the time you pay for handling charges through Summit, it costs the same amount anyway
CK 1345 1291 1154 927 527 527 527
AY 1352 1294 1165 932 567 567 567
DR 1323 1250 1093 882 746 581 570
They sit in the jets blocking the fuel. They are attached to the butterfly looking plates on top of the secondaries by a cam. When vacuum pulls those open it lifts the rods out of the jets letting the fuel out. The thicker the rod the less fuel that can come out. And the lower the hanger the latter the thin part of the rod comes up and vice versa. So thinner rods and higher hole on the hanger makes richer fuel delivery. But like Marc said, you don't want to go to thin for your application and be blowing smoke out the back of your car.
Originally posted by Marc 85Z28
Just the swap from stock CH rods and L hanger on my car to DR rods and an E hanger dropped .35 off my 1/4. That was on back to back runs!
Just the swap from stock CH rods and L hanger on my car to DR rods and an E hanger dropped .35 off my 1/4. That was on back to back runs!
It only gained 1 MPH, but it was so much more responsive!
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
95z_28_camaro_4_Ivan
General 1967-2002 F-Body Tech
13
Oct 3, 2015 07:27 PM



