3rd Gen / L98 Engine Tech 1982 - 1992 Engine Related

'89 IROC backend higher than '92 RS> Spring Rates?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Oct 4, 2003 | 10:19 PM
  #1  
Black6SpdTA's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 2,043
From: Mooresville, NC
'89 IROC backend higher than '92 RS> Spring Rates?

My boss has his '89 IROC for sale (every option you can get, White, $4100, etc.). Anyway I parked next to him today at work and his back end sat higher than mine. What's the deal? Do IROC's have higher spring rates? We both have 16" wheels and 50 series tires. Thanks

-Rippin
Old Oct 5, 2003 | 04:51 AM
  #2  
AutoRoc's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 1999
Posts: 2,342
From: MI
YEs IROC Springs are firmer however they are .5" lower than other models that are non-IROC-Z package equipped. Why is yours lower? It probably has more miles, has been loaded heavier to wear them down more, or something else abnormal is happening.

My IROC has 1.25" lowering springs on it all the way around and my sisters 92 RS sits LOWER than my car. Hers has 135,000 Miles, mine has 60,000. That's the reason in this situation.

IS it cool to be worn out and lower? NO! It's actually dangerous considering the car handles softer/worse and things are probably more likely to break. Goodluck!

A Full or near full or empty gas tank has an effect along with added weight in the hatch area(ie: stereo equipment).
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
dbusch22
Forced Induction
6
Oct 31, 2016 11:09 AM
linz
3rd Gen / L98 Engine Tech
1
Oct 22, 2015 07:59 AM
meissen
Midwest
5
Jun 1, 2015 07:59 AM
ModdedNerd
Suspension, Chassis, and Brakes
1
Dec 25, 2014 05:51 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:25 AM.