3rd Gen / L98 Engine Tech 1982 - 1992 Engine Related

383 stroker

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Oct 8, 2002 | 12:51 AM
  #1  
99huggerorangeZ's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 377
From: windsor locks,ct
Question 383 stroker

would it be better to use a 5.7in rod or a 6.0?
Old Oct 8, 2002 | 11:34 AM
  #2  
irocz383's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 670
From: Surrey, B.C., Canada
If you use a 5.7 then it ends up being a 381 or something like that.

If you want the true 383 uses the 6" rods, 4.030 bore, and a 3.75 crank.
Old Oct 8, 2002 | 11:56 AM
  #3  
Drkhrse89's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 151
From: Minnesota
I dont think that rods mean anything as far as ci goes. The only thing that is going to affect that is the bore size. I am by no means the expert on this but if you are going to keep this beast on the street I would say go with the 5.7s.
Old Oct 8, 2002 | 01:58 PM
  #4  
irocz383's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 670
From: Surrey, B.C., Canada
Your cubic inches is determined by multiplying the bore size, stroke, and number of cylinders.

Or something along those lines. If the rod length doesn't affect the cubic inches it will definatley effect your stroke effeciency and compression.

I built mine with 6" rods and the only problem I ran into was hitting the water jackets during clearancing. That was fixeed by cementing the bottom half of the block.

BTW... My motor is going to be a daily driver making ~420 RWHP.

Its your call! I would go with the 6" rods though. It gives that little extra adge of performance.
Old Oct 8, 2002 | 05:29 PM
  #5  
Damon's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 1969
Posts: 1,147
From: Phila., PA
If you have to buy rods anyway, then go with the 6"ers. It doesn't cost much more and the rings will seal better and last longer, although you won't see any real power gains, as you may have heard.

The type and manufacturer of the rods has a lot to do with clearance issues in a stroker. Some rods require very little clearance- some rods you'll strike water, hit a cam lobe, etc.

Before you lay out money for the rods talk to someone who has actually already built a 383 with them and ask about what learance problems they encountered. I have used stock 5.7" rods and they clear relatively easy.
Old Oct 8, 2002 | 05:54 PM
  #6  
Fast3rdGen's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 22
From: fairborn, ohio, usa
i used 6" eagle h-beams with an eagle crank in my 2-bolt 010 block. had to clearance the oil pan rails and bottoms of the cylinder walls but didn't get into any jackets. they also clear non-small base circle cams by a mile so long as its not a roller cam. the only rods i know of that clear roller cams are those $800 crower sportsman rods.
Old Oct 8, 2002 | 09:36 PM
  #7  
TheGreatJ's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2000
Posts: 1,677
From: T-town
The 6" rods are better for the rings and cylinder walls, but are also harder to clearance for and leave less deck height on the pistons which means your wristpins will be all up in the oil control ring.....as far as I know this hasn't caused anyone problems but its an idea I just don't like the sound of.
Old Oct 8, 2002 | 10:23 PM
  #8  
86 redbird's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 160
From: West Virginia
From what i've heard, the only reason to use 6 in rods is the fact that it lowers rotating mass. I'm about to build a mild stroker and i plan on using the 5.7 rods so i don't have to mess with the block clearancing.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Quickss96
Cars For Sale
6
Jan 29, 2016 05:56 PM
Z Power
LT1 Based Engine Tech
8
Sep 19, 2015 11:19 PM
cristian1311
General 1967-2002 F-Body Tech
2
Sep 12, 2015 08:16 PM
95craz28
Fuel and Ignition
11
Sep 12, 2015 07:47 AM
alphaauto
Cars For Sale
0
Jul 26, 2015 04:40 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:35 PM.