Why not a turbo V6?
#32
no auto for the fsi???!!
so im a vw tech and the FSI 2.0t vw motor which is now the TSI motor are 90% auto or dsg out of every car in the shop i see at the most 1 manual 2.0t do to the fact the the 6speed dsg gets beter mileage then the manual, and its faster to with its .1 sec **** times and the 2.0t gets 30 highway miles. when the base 2.5 only gets about 27 highway
#33
I agree that a production turbo V6 isn't a good idea for the new Camaro. The LS series V8s are cheaper to build than a Turbocharged Intercooled V6 that could get the same amount of HP.
Another option for a mid-level Camaro would be for a DOHC V8 based off the 304hp V6, with VVT, Direct Injection & DOD. Say roughly 4.8-5.0 liters, with 375-400 hp. This should make it so there's a V8 Camaro that can get 26-27 mpg on the highway, instead of just 24-25 mpg with the 6.2 liter V8.
And a Turbo Diesel V6 or V8 is definitely a Bad Idea. Turbo Diesels are basically Torque monsters with RPM that never exceed 5,000. Yes they may get better MPG than a normal gas engine - but the HP is less than in the 304hp V6 engine. So performance would suffer for it. And the Camaro is a Performance car. A better option make the Camaro a Hybrid - which would maintain it's current performance - yet enable the car to improve it overall fuel economy by about 25%. That would allow it to have roughly the same as a Turbo Diesel V6.
Another option for a mid-level Camaro would be for a DOHC V8 based off the 304hp V6, with VVT, Direct Injection & DOD. Say roughly 4.8-5.0 liters, with 375-400 hp. This should make it so there's a V8 Camaro that can get 26-27 mpg on the highway, instead of just 24-25 mpg with the 6.2 liter V8.
And a Turbo Diesel V6 or V8 is definitely a Bad Idea. Turbo Diesels are basically Torque monsters with RPM that never exceed 5,000. Yes they may get better MPG than a normal gas engine - but the HP is less than in the 304hp V6 engine. So performance would suffer for it. And the Camaro is a Performance car. A better option make the Camaro a Hybrid - which would maintain it's current performance - yet enable the car to improve it overall fuel economy by about 25%. That would allow it to have roughly the same as a Turbo Diesel V6.
#34
Doesn't the New V8 camaro have that feature were it shuts down like 4 cylinders on the highway to save fuel?? If it's only rated at 25 mpg it must not, if they added that feature couldn;t he V8 get much better mileage?? Like 30?
coudl they make that feature with more user control, like the ability to turn it on and off with a switch?
a 6.2L running on 4 would still be a 3.1L engine which should be enough to put around.
wouldn't that be the way to go??
Would a Super Charger be cheap than a turbo?? They should do the SC on the v6 so they can keep the price down.
coudl they make that feature with more user control, like the ability to turn it on and off with a switch?
a 6.2L running on 4 would still be a 3.1L engine which should be enough to put around.
wouldn't that be the way to go??
Would a Super Charger be cheap than a turbo?? They should do the SC on the v6 so they can keep the price down.
Last edited by Evolution223; 09-26-2010 at 05:04 PM.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
cmsmith
2010 - 2015 Camaro News, Sightings, Pictures, and Multimedia
0
09-14-2015 09:09 PM
NewsBot
2010 - 2015 Camaro News, Sightings, Pictures, and Multimedia
0
09-14-2015 02:02 AM
LeftoverChinese
Parts For Sale
0
07-23-2015 03:57 PM