2010 - 2015 Camaro Technical Discussion All 5th Generation Camaro technical discussion that doesn't fit in other forums

Turbo 6 cylinder option?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Feb 12, 2008 | 02:47 PM
  #1  
STOCK1SC's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 1,049
From: Confederate States of America
Turbo 6 cylinder option?

With the rumors about the 3.5 twin turbo going into the new Mustang, what do you guys think about a Turbo 6 in the Camaro? I've been hoping for the option since 1987 when I first experienced a stock Grand National that produced more torque than the L-98 in the Vette. I personally would prefer a turbo 6(with strong internals) over a NA V8. If they could get AFM to work on it that would be even better. Anybody else a turbo fan or strictly V8's only? Let me edit, I want a turbo 6 that can be cheaply modified and won't grenade. If it's made of glass then give me the V8.
Old Feb 12, 2008 | 04:03 PM
  #2  
mike24's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 237
From: united states
Personally i would consider a turbo 6 .
Old Feb 14, 2008 | 05:14 AM
  #3  
metal's Avatar
SEMA Media Team
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 136
From: Mi
I'd buy one in a heartbeat. (no pun intended)
Old Feb 14, 2008 | 10:02 AM
  #4  
STOCK1SC's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 1,049
From: Confederate States of America
I like the turbo option mainly for the weight savings(unless it's iron blocked) and the easy modibility of turbo's. they're free horsepower waiting to be uncorked.
Old Feb 14, 2008 | 10:24 AM
  #5  
JakeRobb's Avatar
Super Moderator
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 9,507
From: Okemos, MI
I think it's a great idea. I'd consider it if it were in the ~350hp range.
Old Feb 14, 2008 | 11:31 AM
  #6  
metal's Avatar
SEMA Media Team
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 136
From: Mi
Originally Posted by JakeRobb
I think it's a great idea. I'd consider it if it were in the ~350hp range.
I can't imagine it wouldn't, those 20+ year old SFI Buick V6's have been past that for... what 20 years
Old Feb 14, 2008 | 12:56 PM
  #7  
JakeRobb's Avatar
Super Moderator
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 9,507
From: Okemos, MI
Originally Posted by metal
I can't imagine it wouldn't, those 20+ year old SFI Buick V6's have been past that for... what 20 years
Um, no, they haven't.

My lightly-modded GN makes about 260rwhp. It's the torque that makes it special.

If I bought a Camaro with a turbo V6, I would want it to make at least 350hp and 350lb-ft.
Old Feb 14, 2008 | 01:16 PM
  #8  
metal's Avatar
SEMA Media Team
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 136
From: Mi
Originally Posted by JakeRobb
Um, no, they haven't.

My lightly-modded GN makes about 260rwhp. It's the torque that makes it special.

If I bought a Camaro with a turbo V6, I would want it to make at least 350hp and 350lb-ft.
Hi
I didn't mean stock
Back at the powertour in 01 my bolt on 89 Turbo T/A Dyno'd 349.8 RWHP and 416 torque on a stock turbo.
I haven't dynoed my Turbo Z or my current Turbo T/A but they have many many more mods then I had back then.
I don't think it would be too hard for a Turbo 6 2010 Camaro to be 350RWHP from the factory
Old Feb 14, 2008 | 01:19 PM
  #9  
5thGen's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 547
I would definetely consider a turbo 6 based on price.

If Ford comes out (as the rumors say) with a Twin turbo 6 making 415-425 hp and as much torque as the GT, for the same price as the GT, it will be on my list.

If GM does the same, it too will be on my list. As long as I can special order it without other options and an Manual Trans, it's all good.
Old Feb 14, 2008 | 01:40 PM
  #10  
christianjax's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 881
From: Jacksonville Florida
having owned and LOVED a Grand National (still my favorite car I ever owned) I would jump at the chance to own a new V6 Turbo if it dominated like the GN's did back in thier day.
Old Feb 14, 2008 | 01:45 PM
  #11  
JakeRobb's Avatar
Super Moderator
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 9,507
From: Okemos, MI
Originally Posted by metal
Back at the powertour in 01 my bolt on 89 Turbo T/A Dyno'd 349.8 RWHP and 416 torque on a stock turbo.
What mods did you have to make those numbers? My GN isn't stock, but it doesn't make anywhere near that much power.
Old Feb 14, 2008 | 03:36 PM
  #12  
STOCK1SC's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 1,049
From: Confederate States of America
Originally Posted by 5thGen
I would definetely consider a turbo 6 based on price.

If Ford comes out (as the rumors say) with a Twin turbo 6 making 415-425 hp and as much torque as the GT, for the same price as the GT, it will be on my list.

If GM does the same, it too will be on my list. As long as I can special order it without other options and an Manual Trans, it's all good.
I'm exactly like you, whichever is the better bang for the buck, durable, and cheap to mod will be in my garage. I was glad to see Ford coming to it's senses, the only problem is a lot of the purists have a hard time considering anything other than a V8. I'll take a quick revving DOHC Turbo 6 anyday!
Old Feb 14, 2008 | 10:01 PM
  #13  
metal's Avatar
SEMA Media Team
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 136
From: Mi
Originally Posted by JakeRobb
What mods did you have to make those numbers? My GN isn't stock, but it doesn't make anywhere near that much power.
K&N, chip, 42lbs injectors, fuel pump, hotwire kit, adjustable FP regulator, THDP (with the cutout open) converter.
Thats about it.
I just dug up a picture of the dyno chart it was 349.8 and 412 ft lbs torque.
Old Feb 14, 2008 | 10:48 PM
  #14  
FAD1's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 238
From: Los Angeles, Ca
I would like anything that would take out those Stangs. I don't know if i can afford those?
Old Feb 15, 2008 | 08:37 AM
  #15  
LeadSled1's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2000
Posts: 182
From: Earleville, MD
If the V8 and turbo 6 had the same performance/cost numbers, I would pick the turbo 6.



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:45 AM.