2010 - 2015 Camaro Technical Discussion All 5th Generation Camaro technical discussion that doesn't fit in other forums

So what displacement with the base V8 be?

Old Oct 25, 2006 | 01:08 PM
  #16  
Casull's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 336
From: Indianapolis
Originally Posted by graham
The "327" as in what the dealer brochures used to advertise as the 5.3L motor. The size was 325.
Kinda like the current 427?
Old Oct 25, 2006 | 01:15 PM
  #17  
graham's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 1999
Posts: 2,887
From: northeast Miss.
Its 427.4 right?
Old Oct 25, 2006 | 01:17 PM
  #18  
Casull's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 336
From: Indianapolis
Originally Posted by graham
Its 427.4 right?
I thought it was 425.... maybe i am wrong... I will have to look it up now
Old Oct 25, 2006 | 01:45 PM
  #19  
Z28x's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2000
Posts: 10,285
From: Albany, NY
Originally Posted by casull
Kinda like the current 427?
Nope, the 427 (LS7) is actually 427.6 They rounded down instead of up.

427 could equal 426.5-427.9
but 247.5-427.9 could also be rounded up to 428 if they wanted even though it technically isn't 428.

The 5.3L is 325ci, LS1 was a 346ci
Old Oct 25, 2006 | 01:49 PM
  #20  
Casull's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 336
From: Indianapolis
Originally Posted by Z28x
Nope, the 427 (LS7) is actually 427.6 They rounded down instead of up.
Beat me to it.... was just getting ready to post this.
Old Oct 27, 2006 | 02:02 AM
  #21  
Big Als Z's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 4,306
From: Jersey Shore
So if we have a 300hp V6, and a 450hp V8....thats a lot of uncoverd ground. There has to be a 350-380hp engine to fill the void, soemthing to go head to head with the next Mustang GT.

and ps, when was someone going to tell me that they moved the 5th gen forum to the top. I kept looking in near the Automotive news section/Fourm area. Damn sob's trying to hide this on me!
Old Oct 27, 2006 | 08:29 AM
  #22  
GRNcamaro's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 662
From: albany, ny
maybe they will bring back the 5.7 350
Old Oct 27, 2006 | 09:10 AM
  #23  
FS3800's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 1,028
From: Chicago, IL
Originally Posted by Big Als Z
and ps, when was someone going to tell me that they moved the 5th gen forum to the top. I kept looking in near the Automotive news section/Fourm area. Damn sob's trying to hide this on me!
LOL, the whole point of moving it to the top was to make it easier to find, for newbies especially.... and it's been up there for a couple months now i think..

i mean, how can you miss it.. you click message board and BAM it's right there in red and white
Old Oct 27, 2006 | 10:35 AM
  #24  
Z28x's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2000
Posts: 10,285
From: Albany, NY
There needs to be a Mustang GT priced V8 Camaro, and I don't see a 450HP 6.2L Camaro being that car.
Old Oct 27, 2006 | 10:24 PM
  #25  
305fan's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 1,308
From: Calgary
Originally Posted by OctaneZ28
5.3L would be a possibility, but to my knowledge there are no new 5.3L engines in the pipeline for RWD car applications.
Just because an engine has more displacement and more power doesn't mean it costs a ton more to make.
just use the truck engines. Swap cams, pcm, exhaust, it would be an easy 330-340hp.
Old Oct 27, 2006 | 11:50 PM
  #26  
Big Als Z's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 4,306
From: Jersey Shore
Originally Posted by FS3800
LOL, the whole point of moving it to the top was to make it easier to find, for newbies especially.... and it's been up there for a couple months now i think..

i mean, how can you miss it.. you click message board and BAM it's right there in red and white
I have it saved in a favorite file, and I guess it set itself for the Automotive news section.

[/hijack]
Old Oct 28, 2006 | 02:36 AM
  #27  
JohnnyPappis's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 291
They arent going to use a 5.3 for the camaro simple reason why......it would cost more to have yet another engine type then the base corvette of the time LS3 the z06 LS7 and Blue devil LS9 Gm's current trend dictates they arent in there old way of thinking look at the power ratings on the GTO if anything the LS7 will be at 500 in the SS because the z06 will jump up in power and with the mustang redesign around the coner we need that power i feel the power will only go up not take a step back.....
Old Oct 28, 2006 | 08:33 AM
  #28  
BitchinCamaro's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 267
From: Woburn, MA
Originally Posted by graham
The "327" as in what the dealer brochures used to advertise as the 5.3L motor. The size was 325.
Originally Posted by Z28x
Nope, the 427 (LS7) is actually 427.6 They rounded down instead of up.

427 could equal 426.5-427.9
but 247.5-427.9 could also be rounded up to 428 if they wanted even though it technically isn't 428.

The 5.3L is 325ci, LS1 was a 346ci
They have been doing that for decades. When the 396 was redesigned it in 1970 it went to 402 ci, but they kept the 396 name since it was so recognizable. But I guess shifting down isn't as bad as shifting up.
Old Oct 28, 2006 | 10:17 AM
  #29  
Casull's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 336
From: Indianapolis
Originally Posted by JohnnyPappis
They arent going to use a 5.3 for the camaro simple reason why......it would cost more to have yet another engine type then the base corvette of the time LS3 the z06 LS7 and Blue devil LS9 Gm's current trend dictates they arent in there old way of thinking look at the power ratings on the GTO if anything the LS7 will be at 500 in the SS because the z06 will jump up in power and with the mustang redesign around the coner we need that power i feel the power will only go up not take a step back.....
How would it cost more to have another engine type if that engine is already in production? There are already reports that the 5.3L will be used in other vehicles, so it is not like they are developing this engine just for the Camaro. There would be absolutely no added cost associated with using the 5.3, and in all actuality, since the 5.3 has been used now for so long, it would be a lot cheaper becasue they are able to spread the fixed costs of producing that engine over all of these vehicles. They have already absorbed all of the R&D and engineering costs, so they would basically only be out the cost of manufacturing the thing - unlike the new LS3 or even the LS7.

What exactly do you mean that "current trend dictates they arent in there old way of thinking look at the power ratings on the GTO" I hardly think this is applicable. The GTO had 1 engine option and was not intended to sale 100,000 units.
Old Oct 28, 2006 | 12:05 PM
  #30  
stars1010's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 3,121
From: Houston
Originally Posted by casull
How would it cost more to have another engine type if that engine is already in production? There are already reports that the 5.3L will be used in other vehicles, so it is not like they are developing this engine just for the Camaro. There would be absolutely no added cost associated with using the 5.3, and in all actuality, since the 5.3 has been used now for so long, it would be a lot cheaper becasue they are able to spread the fixed costs of producing that engine over all of these vehicles. They have already absorbed all of the R&D and engineering costs, so they would basically only be out the cost of manufacturing the thing - unlike the new LS3 or even the LS7.

What exactly do you mean that "current trend dictates they arent in there old way of thinking look at the power ratings on the GTO" I hardly think this is applicable. The GTO had 1 engine option and was not intended to sale 100,000 units.

I have it straight from the horse’s mouth on a digital recorder that the 5.3L will not be used.

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:51 AM.