2010 - 2015 Camaro Technical Discussion All 5th Generation Camaro technical discussion that doesn't fit in other forums

Bye-Bye to GM's V-8s

Old 01-20-2008 | 03:10 PM
  #31  
DAKMOR's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 1,406
From: Philaduhphia
The main problem I see when you compare V6 to V8 in a car, is the transmission.

I also read about it once on here.

Basically the transmission is setup for the v8, and the V6 with those gear ratios is just pure weak, even if you change rear gears, it doesn't make up for it. Maybe we'll see better transmissions design specifically for V6 engines.
Old 01-20-2008 | 03:47 PM
  #32  
SupplySgt.'s Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 218
From: Murfreesboro, TN
In something like the Camaro, The V6 doesn't make that big of a difference in terms of gas mileage. My v6 camaro gets about 35 mpg or so and i've seen plenty of Z28s that get about 30. and those are 12 year old cars. If those camaros had todays technology then they would probably be getting better gas mileage. And like someone else said the V8s will never leave the truck. you think Toyota is gonna take their 5.7L out of the tundra? hell no. and as long as they don't give it up neither will GM or Ford or Dodge or Nissan cause all of them won't be able to compete if they did.
Old 01-20-2008 | 03:48 PM
  #33  
SupplySgt.'s Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 218
From: Murfreesboro, TN
Oh and they need to drop the inline 6 before they drop the V8 if they're worried about gas. especially in SUVs inline 6s are horrible on gas, worse than the V8s. Inline 6s are good for midrange power but that's about it
Old 01-20-2008 | 10:55 PM
  #34  
jerminator96's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 1,374
From: Raleigh, NC
Originally Posted by wildpaws
Sorry, no V6 back then, it was an inline six!
Clyde
You are correct, my mistake.

To all those who say a 6 cyl won't cut it because of a lack of torque, tell that to the guy driving this:



The number of cylinders does not make the torque, displacement does. Give me a 6 liter straight-6 and I'll show you some torque.
Old 01-22-2008 | 09:07 PM
  #35  
bossco's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 2,977
From: SeVa
Originally Posted by DAKMOR
even if you change rear gears, it doesn't make up for it. Maybe we'll see better transmissions design specifically for V6 engines.
I dunno about that, but when your limited on torque I can see how having a transmission with a few more ratios added in would help.
Old 01-22-2008 | 10:39 PM
  #36  
SCNGENNFTHGEN's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 1,579
From: The Land of Pleasant Living
Exclamation

Man people really still read car & drivel.....
Old 01-23-2008 | 09:20 AM
  #37  
Gripenfelter's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 3,647
From: Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
I think we'll still have V8s. We'll just see more hybrid V8s.
Old 01-23-2008 | 09:54 AM
  #38  
john storie's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: May 1999
Posts: 416
From: Charleston SC
long ago, i talked to Scott about an "import beater" built from readily GM Parts.

put a V6 (i think the year 2000 V6 had ~225HP?) and a T56 in a Cavalier with 4:10 gears.

i think that would be a ROCKET. the V6 would make enough HP/TQ for the light weight of a Cavalier,

and the 4:10 gears would ensure the V6 could dig out of the hole, and keep moving on top end to a high MPH

and a M6, well, is just the funnest transmission there is.

i think that would put the import/tuner/ricer world on it's ear.

a light weight RWD car with world class potential

and the aftermarket would go crazy.

who would be the first to twin turbo one?

the inline 6 cylinder Cummins Turbo Diesel in your average dodge pick'em'up makes 325/610 stock,

and with a intake, exhaust, programmer & nitrous, will do 500/1000 all day long.
Old 01-23-2008 | 11:21 AM
  #39  
mpilarZ281992's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 116
Hmmmmmmmmm. I dont mind the high power V-6 option in a camaro, but that is like finding out that the girl of your dreams had been stuffing her bra and is not the doube Ds you wish you had.
Old 01-23-2008 | 06:27 PM
  #40  
Steve in Seattle's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2000
Posts: 1,445
From: Seattle, WA
Originally Posted by john storie
long ago, i talked to Scott about an "import beater" built from readily GM Parts.

put a V6 (i think the year 2000 V6 had ~225HP?) and a T56 in a Cavalier with 4:10 gears.

i think that would be a ROCKET.
Already been done... it's called a Ford Falcon XR6 Turbo.

T56 6-speed, turbo 4.0L V6, RWD, sedan: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ford_Falcon_XR6_Turbo

Of course this one's over 380hp and a bit larger...
Old 01-23-2008 | 06:58 PM
  #41  
krazzycowgirl's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 2,446
From: Yelm, Wa USA
Hey steve havent see you in a while.
Old 01-23-2008 | 09:10 PM
  #42  
90rocz's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 1999
Posts: 2,947
From: Springfield,OH. U.S.A.
long ago, i talked to Scott about an "import beater" built from readily GM Parts.
Already have some for over a year...

2007 Pontiac Solstice GXP - Road Tests
BY DAVE VANDERWERP, PHOTOGRAPHY BY MORGAN J. SEGAL
October 2006 C&D
"This 2007 Solstice, and also the mechanically similar Saturn Sky Red Line, packs a punch of 260 horsepower and 260 pound-feet of torque from a direct-injection turbocharged and intercooled 2.0-liter version of GM’s four-cylinder Ecotec. Yes, the stodgy General is introducing its first gasoline direct-injection turbo at the same time as BMW. Shocked"?
And now the Cobalt SS will join them with a 260hp, turbo 4, from what I understand.....a triple threat!
Old 01-24-2008 | 11:58 AM
  #43  
Grape Ape's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 94
Originally Posted by 90rocz
Already have some for over a year...


And now the Cobalt SS will join them with a 260hp, turbo 4, from what I understand.....a triple threat!
And the HHR SS makes four unless I missed some news. But didn't the FWDs get a slight de-tune (5-15 HP)?

Last edited by Grape Ape; 01-24-2008 at 12:00 PM.
Old 02-01-2008 | 09:25 PM
  #44  
5thGen's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 547
The original small block lasted how many years?

So they dropped the luxury DOHC V8, that does not mean they won't invest something into the Northstar maybe Direct Injection, Variable cams, etc.

I think they need to fix how they spend their money. For one, they need to pay some lobbyists to get Universal Health care passed. There is about 1800 per car right there. You can pay your execs millions of dollars each, pay me a few mill and I will go bug the hell out of those bastards. Drop the huge ad campaigns and go for something more unique. Then, they need to lobby the government to sponsor research into inexpensive lighter and stronger materials. Research ways to make new materials like composites or those new "foam" metals less expensive.



A 1983 Ford Escort wagon would get 54 MPG. Look at the weight of that car VS a 2008 Ford Focus. There's your problem.
Old 02-01-2008 | 09:29 PM
  #45  
5thGen's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 547
back closer to topic,

My hope is the Camaro will get the 300+ HP V6. My concern is the car will be heavy, making 300 not enough to make it quicker than a 05-09 Mustang GT right off the lot.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
F'n1996Z28SS
Cars For Sale
8
08-23-2023 11:19 PM
rvonsternberg
Cars For Sale
2
09-14-2015 11:58 AM
Z284ever
Automotive News / Industry / Future Vehicle Discussion
22
11-05-2003 02:13 PM
Ted 99 TA WS6 Conv
Automotive News / Industry / Future Vehicle Discussion
10
07-30-2003 06:41 AM


Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Quick Reply: Bye-Bye to GM's V-8s



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:03 PM.