Base Vette and Camaro engine info?
Base Vette and Camaro engine info?
Read this link...say's 450hp for each.
http://www.digitalcorvettes.com/foru...ad.php?t=64611
OR Here...
http://www.gminsidenews.com/forums/s...ad.php?t=39431
Quote from the article...
http://www.digitalcorvettes.com/foru...ad.php?t=64611
OR Here...
http://www.gminsidenews.com/forums/s...ad.php?t=39431
Quote from the article...
CC: So are you going to do your own versions of the new Camaro?
Saleen: It's not legally official right now, but that's what we're hoping for.
CC: What kind of upgrades will you make, have you seen the engine GM is using in the Camaro?
Saleen: I hope I don't get in trouble with GM for saying this, but they're using a 6.2 liter 450 horsepower engine for the premium V8 in the 2009 Camaro and the base Corvette. The base V8 will probably be a detuned version of the same 6.2. So we'll just upgrade the 6.2 liter V8 to Saleen level specifications. We're going to upgrade the 6.2 liter V8 if we're given the legal chance by GM. Our base model should have around 485 horsepower, and expect our Extreme Supercharged Camaro to have over 600 horsepower.
Saleen: It's not legally official right now, but that's what we're hoping for.
CC: What kind of upgrades will you make, have you seen the engine GM is using in the Camaro?
Saleen: I hope I don't get in trouble with GM for saying this, but they're using a 6.2 liter 450 horsepower engine for the premium V8 in the 2009 Camaro and the base Corvette. The base V8 will probably be a detuned version of the same 6.2. So we'll just upgrade the 6.2 liter V8 to Saleen level specifications. We're going to upgrade the 6.2 liter V8 if we're given the legal chance by GM. Our base model should have around 485 horsepower, and expect our Extreme Supercharged Camaro to have over 600 horsepower.
Last edited by greg_nate; Oct 26, 2006 at 08:53 PM.
Just FYI, I posted this info about a week ago.
http://web.camaross.com/forums/showthread.php?t=479806
http://web.camaross.com/forums/showthread.php?t=479806
Just FYI, I posted this info about a week ago.
http://web.camaross.com/forums/showthread.php?t=479806
http://web.camaross.com/forums/showthread.php?t=479806
If this point has been discussed before then I aoplogize for bringing it up again but if it hasn't been specifically addressed I'd apprecitate some info...
It all its history, I can't recall a time when the Camaro/Firebird was ever allowed to have the same or more HP than the Corvette. Of course, it's fairly recent history that essentially the same enging was used in both vehicles but even then, the F-bodies were not allowed to produce the same HP and I would say for good reason...after all, if I'm paying $10-$15-20K more for a Corvette I expect to get the top in HP.
I know all the claims about the LS1 simply being underrated and that may well be but I've seen dyno runs for many LS1 F-bodies and from LS1 Corvettes and the Corvettes have consistently put more HP to the ground; so underrated or not, I would still contend that the 'Vette will always have more.
That said, I don't understand the basis for these rumors and stories I keep reading wich either directly or in a round about way, seem to suggest that the Camrao will have the same or even more HP than the Corvette.
Could some one clear this up for me?
Thanks!
It all its history, I can't recall a time when the Camaro/Firebird was ever allowed to have the same or more HP than the Corvette. Of course, it's fairly recent history that essentially the same enging was used in both vehicles but even then, the F-bodies were not allowed to produce the same HP and I would say for good reason...after all, if I'm paying $10-$15-20K more for a Corvette I expect to get the top in HP.
I know all the claims about the LS1 simply being underrated and that may well be but I've seen dyno runs for many LS1 F-bodies and from LS1 Corvettes and the Corvettes have consistently put more HP to the ground; so underrated or not, I would still contend that the 'Vette will always have more.
That said, I don't understand the basis for these rumors and stories I keep reading wich either directly or in a round about way, seem to suggest that the Camrao will have the same or even more HP than the Corvette.
Could some one clear this up for me?
Thanks!
If this point has been discussed before then I aoplogize for bringing it up again but if it hasn't been specifically addressed I'd apprecitate some info...
It all its history, I can't recall a time when the Camaro/Firebird was ever allowed to have the same or more HP than the Corvette. Of course, it's fairly recent history that essentially the same enging was used in both vehicles but even then, the F-bodies were not allowed to produce the same HP and I would say for good reason...after all, if I'm paying $10-$15-20K more for a Corvette I expect to get the top in HP.
I know all the claims about the LS1 simply being underrated and that may well be but I've seen dyno runs for many LS1 F-bodies and from LS1 Corvettes and the Corvettes have consistently put more HP to the ground; so underrated or not, I would still contend that the 'Vette will always have more.
That said, I don't understand the basis for these rumors and stories I keep reading wich either directly or in a round about way, seem to suggest that the Camrao will have the same or even more HP than the Corvette.
Could some one clear this up for me?
Thanks!
It all its history, I can't recall a time when the Camaro/Firebird was ever allowed to have the same or more HP than the Corvette. Of course, it's fairly recent history that essentially the same enging was used in both vehicles but even then, the F-bodies were not allowed to produce the same HP and I would say for good reason...after all, if I'm paying $10-$15-20K more for a Corvette I expect to get the top in HP.
I know all the claims about the LS1 simply being underrated and that may well be but I've seen dyno runs for many LS1 F-bodies and from LS1 Corvettes and the Corvettes have consistently put more HP to the ground; so underrated or not, I would still contend that the 'Vette will always have more.
That said, I don't understand the basis for these rumors and stories I keep reading wich either directly or in a round about way, seem to suggest that the Camrao will have the same or even more HP than the Corvette.
Could some one clear this up for me?
Thanks!
I know all the claims about the LS1 simply being underrated and that may well be but I've seen dyno runs for many LS1 F-bodies and from LS1 Corvettes and the Corvettes have consistently put more HP to the ground; so underrated or not, I would still contend that the 'Vette will always have more.
Case in point, scan of a dyno test article from 98 on a TA and Vette:
http://bellsouthpwp.net/j/s/jstriet/dynoarticle.jpg
(my web space isn't working well, shows stock dyno of 98 TA and 98 Vette, both 6spds, both with few miles. 292 rwhp for the TA, 285 rwhp for the Vette which should be within the margin of error from one dynorun to the next, power is virtually identical).
Same article (on a page I didn't scan) had a test on the 98 305hp DOHC 4.6 Cobra as well, it put out 256 rwhp. Obviously the LS1 in the Fbody was not putting out a mere 305hp like Chevy claimed. The LS1 made just shy of 40 more rwhp than its true 305 hp Ford counterpart.
Last edited by Ray86IROC; Oct 27, 2006 at 11:28 PM.
1990-91 Z28/IROC-Z 245hp, Corvette non ZL-1 245hp (from sales brochure)
1996 Camaro SS 305hp, Corvette w/auto 300hp
I still believe that the top 5th gen model will get the same engine that the base corvette gets.
I don't want to get overly simplistic...I realize the differences are more than that but still...if I had just put out that much more money for a "Vette and then heard that the Camaro was going to have the same engine with the same HP (and maybe even more if the boasts can be believed); I'd be really pissed.
Am I the only one who sees that as an issue?
The paper rating and the lighter weight (making it slightly faster still) and better handling of the Vettes seems to have gotten the job done well enough through the years. I mean the Fbodies have had very very similar true power output since 93, the Vette and Fbody LT1s were similarly putting down virtually identical power then too. You don't hear too many Vette owners complaining over the years.
I know my good buddy who went from a LS1 Fbody to a LS1 Vette certainly felt like he was upgrading significantly regardless of virtually identical power, and I certainly agreed. The C5 is nicer than the Fbody in virtually every way. The great handling and just overall feel of the car makes it seem far superior IMO.
I'm sure Vette guys who aren't Camaro enthusiasts don't know about, or don't put much stock in the claims of underrated Fbodies anyway.
Since everyone is thinking the weight of the 5thgen is likely to increase at least a little over the 4thgen, even if the 5thgen gets the same LS3 or whatever as the Vette the gap between the two should actually increase over previous offerings. The Vette is about as light as ever and the 5thgen will be on the heavy side...
I know my good buddy who went from a LS1 Fbody to a LS1 Vette certainly felt like he was upgrading significantly regardless of virtually identical power, and I certainly agreed. The C5 is nicer than the Fbody in virtually every way. The great handling and just overall feel of the car makes it seem far superior IMO.
I'm sure Vette guys who aren't Camaro enthusiasts don't know about, or don't put much stock in the claims of underrated Fbodies anyway.
Since everyone is thinking the weight of the 5thgen is likely to increase at least a little over the 4thgen, even if the 5thgen gets the same LS3 or whatever as the Vette the gap between the two should actually increase over previous offerings. The Vette is about as light as ever and the 5thgen will be on the heavy side...
Last edited by Ray86IROC; Oct 29, 2006 at 02:25 PM.
I know my good buddy who went from a LS1 Fbody to a LS1 Vette certainly felt like he was upgrading significantly regardless of virtually identical power, and I certainly agreed. The C5 is nicer than the Fbody in virtually every way. The great handling and just overall feel of the car makes it seem far superior IMO.
I'm sure Vette guys who aren't Camaro enthusiasts don't know about, or don't put much stock in the claims of underrated Fbodies anyway.
I'm sure Vette guys who aren't Camaro enthusiasts don't know about, or don't put much stock in the claims of underrated Fbodies anyway.
I'd be willing to bet anyone that the 5th gen will have a base Vette engine. I highly doubt GM will be sandbagging the good Camaro nameplate when they have put so much effort into its revival.
Your concerns are about the engine only...if you are so concerned about the engine, then go buy the crate engine and stick it in a rusty Gremlin chassis. Using your logic, that's the cheapest [b]and best[/] route. Screw the Camaro and the Corvette...just pick up a Gremlin from the junkyard for $100, and drop in a $9,000 LS7. You'll be the best on the block.
Trust me, people are basing their decision to buy a Vette on what engine is under the hood. Sure, there are few, but the mass majority of Vette buyers are buying it simply because it is a Vette - not a Camaro, not a WRX, not a Viper, not a 350Z. Its a Vette. Period.


