View Poll Results: Which "formula" best fits your idea of a 5th gen Z/28?
Voters: 116. You may not vote on this poll
Z/28. Which formula best applies?
#61
Ground effects WERE available on 4th-gen Z28's ... my car got the "Sports Appearance Package", that is the same body kit as the RS. Maybe it's not for everybody, but I like it . Since no Chevy dealer ever kept much of a stock of Camaros sitting on their lots, it was hard enough to find one around. When I stumbled across my car at the dealership, and it was sitting there, in nice shiny black, fully loaded with the leather, T-tops, and the ground effects ..... my jaw pretty much hit the floor, and I had to have it! (automatic tranny and all!!! ..... though I've "fixed" that since)
Whew! For a second there I thought you were defending mullets. (FWIW, had they been available in 1995, I would have ordered them myself. )
#62
Ground effects WERE available on 4th-gen Z28's ... my car got the "Sports Appearance Package", that is the same body kit as the RS. Maybe it's not for everybody, but I like it . Since no Chevy dealer ever kept much of a stock of Camaros sitting on their lots, it was hard enough to find one around. When I stumbled across my car at the dealership, and it was sitting there, in nice shiny black, fully loaded with the leather, T-tops, and the ground effects ..... my jaw pretty much hit the floor, and I had to have it! (automatic tranny and all!!! ..... though I've "fixed" that since)
Screw you guys! What do you know anyway?!?!?!?!?
Just to spite you, I can't wait 'til GM slaps some GFX onto the 5th-gen!!!!
Screw you guys! What do you know anyway?!?!?!?!?
Just to spite you, I can't wait 'til GM slaps some GFX onto the 5th-gen!!!!
IMO the 4th Gens were very blah without the GFX. They just looked like an oval without them... The GFX gave the 4th gens a much needed agressive look.
Yep, I had the Sport Appearance Package on my 2002.
#63
What year is your 4th gen? They definitely weren't available in 1995, and for some reason I don't think they became available until the 1997 MY.
Whew! For a second there I thought you were defending mullets. (FWIW, had they been available in 1995, I would have ordered them myself. )
Whew! For a second there I thought you were defending mullets. (FWIW, had they been available in 1995, I would have ordered them myself. )
#65
Yep, I still have the Camaro book from 1996 and there was definitely a GFX option during that year.
#67
As usual, I'm in the minority. The RECENT history is that the Z28 is the "entry" V8 and the SS is the higher performer. I know this isn't necessarily consistent with the earlier Camaro years, but it was the case for the last gen.
Again, I'm in the minority, but I want the Z28 to be an AFFORDABLE, good performing V8 car. Even with one of the non-LS engines GM has, the Camaro will outperform the Mustang GT based on current levels of performance. If GM wants to make a higher performing Camaro, fine, but maybe call it a SS or something else and they can charge what they want.
Again, I'm in the minority, but I want the Z28 to be an AFFORDABLE, good performing V8 car. Even with one of the non-LS engines GM has, the Camaro will outperform the Mustang GT based on current levels of performance. If GM wants to make a higher performing Camaro, fine, but maybe call it a SS or something else and they can charge what they want.
#68
As usual, I'm in the minority. The RECENT history is that the Z28 is the "entry" V8 and the SS is the higher performer. I know this isn't necessarily consistent with the earlier Camaro years, but it was the case for the last gen.
Again, I'm in the minority, but I want the Z28 to be an AFFORDABLE, good performing V8 car. Even with one of the non-LS engines GM has, the Camaro will outperform the Mustang GT based on current levels of performance. If GM wants to make a higher performing Camaro, fine, but maybe call it a SS or something else and they can charge what they want.
Again, I'm in the minority, but I want the Z28 to be an AFFORDABLE, good performing V8 car. Even with one of the non-LS engines GM has, the Camaro will outperform the Mustang GT based on current levels of performance. If GM wants to make a higher performing Camaro, fine, but maybe call it a SS or something else and they can charge what they want.
#69
Long ago I had a '70 Camaro, it was an SS350. Talk about entry level. It had a speedo, fuel gauge and all other functions were monitored by idiot lights. It had 4 hubcaps on it's steel 14" wheels.
It was cool, but like I said, very entry level.
Last edited by Z284ever; 11-25-2007 at 09:31 PM.
#71
Hmmm... I never thought of the Z/28 as the top dog, it always seemed to me that the Z was the road racer, while the SS cars were muscle cars.
I guess that all changed some where in the later 2nd gen years and all the through the 3rd gen years and beyond.
I guess that all changed some where in the later 2nd gen years and all the through the 3rd gen years and beyond.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post