Well its not the fall yet: 12.87 @ 109 Stock
#1
Registered User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: City of Champions, MA, USA
Posts: 1,214
Well its not the fall yet: 12.87 @ 109 Stock
IT was cool that night but still:
60'............. 2.046
330'........... 5.562
660'........... 8.409
660’ mph... 86.59
1000'.......... 10.840
1320'.......... 12.874
1320’ mph… 109.08
Name of the track: Cordova Dragway
Date of pass: 7/17/2009
Weather conditions: (include Density Altitude, if known): DA 986 temp 61F
http://www.camaro5.com/forums/showthread.php?t=33047
Looks like speedy6963 knows how to drive
60'............. 2.046
330'........... 5.562
660'........... 8.409
660’ mph... 86.59
1000'.......... 10.840
1320'.......... 12.874
1320’ mph… 109.08
Name of the track: Cordova Dragway
Date of pass: 7/17/2009
Weather conditions: (include Density Altitude, if known): DA 986 temp 61F
http://www.camaro5.com/forums/showthread.php?t=33047
Looks like speedy6963 knows how to drive
Last edited by super83Z; 07-19-2009 at 06:33 AM.
#2
Registered User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: City of Champions, MA, USA
Posts: 1,214
Haha I read through the thread and there is a guy in Alaska that ran a 13.15 in his L99 car. He said it was his first time ever to the track. Alaska who woulda thunk they have a dragway?
#4
This car is going to be king at the track. I spent some time with a friends bumblebee knockoff yesterday(custom stripes, interior yellow accents, etc), and I'm convinced that I'm buying one. The looks alone are tremendous, and now we know that it's a GT500 killer even stock.
#7
#8
I should have said "can be" given a bad diver in the GT500 and a great driver in the SS. Can't remember which mag just ran both at 12.8 and 12.9, admittedly due to the GT500's traction limitations. My point is that with some mild mods, the SS should be competive
#9
-Geoff
#10
As you stated, that cars biggest issue (outside of tonnage) is poor traction.
#11
Maybe not an SC and maybe not always mild. Let's see what a LTs and a super tune does with this "traction enabled" platform. If we don't overwhelm the tires like the GT500 does, there maybe a good amount of forward go pent up in the stock drivetrain. I like the dyno numbers that the tuners are coming up with on NA set ups, but lets see what that translate to at the track!
#12
With a $13,000 price difference, that leaves cash for some nice mods
#13
Now that's how you break in a new engine!
Good air and driving make all the difference even on a tight new engine.
From the thread it dynoed at 365 rwhp so it's not like the car is a factory freak.
A 2.0 60 ft is very good but not impossible to get so we are defiantly going to see a lot more stock 12 sec slips as the weather cools and some cars get broken in.
Good air and driving make all the difference even on a tight new engine.
From the thread it dynoed at 365 rwhp so it's not like the car is a factory freak.
A 2.0 60 ft is very good but not impossible to get so we are defiantly going to see a lot more stock 12 sec slips as the weather cools and some cars get broken in.
#14
IT was cool that night but still:
60'............. 2.046
330'........... 5.562
660'........... 8.409
660’ mph... 86.59
1000'.......... 10.840
1320'.......... 12.874
1320’ mph… 109.08
Name of the track: Cordova Dragway
Date of pass: 7/17/2009
Weather conditions: (include Density Altitude, if known): DA 986 temp 61F
http://www.camaro5.com/forums/showthread.php?t=33047
Looks like speedy6963 knows how to drive
60'............. 2.046
330'........... 5.562
660'........... 8.409
660’ mph... 86.59
1000'.......... 10.840
1320'.......... 12.874
1320’ mph… 109.08
Name of the track: Cordova Dragway
Date of pass: 7/17/2009
Weather conditions: (include Density Altitude, if known): DA 986 temp 61F
http://www.camaro5.com/forums/showthread.php?t=33047
Looks like speedy6963 knows how to drive
Does GM still use torque management with these cars as well?
#15
Now that's how you break in a new engine!
Good air and driving make all the difference even on a tight new engine.
From the thread it dynoed at 365 rwhp so it's not like the car is a factory freak.
A 2.0 60 ft is very good but not impossible to get so we are defiantly going to see a lot more stock 12 sec slips as the weather cools and some cars get broken in.
Good air and driving make all the difference even on a tight new engine.
From the thread it dynoed at 365 rwhp so it's not like the car is a factory freak.
A 2.0 60 ft is very good but not impossible to get so we are defiantly going to see a lot more stock 12 sec slips as the weather cools and some cars get broken in.