super83Z

http://www.autoblog.com/2009/05/07/6...aro-ss-sa-600/

Looks pretty

z28 justin

Awesome to the max

97z28/m6

best comment:

chconline 9:35PM (5/07/2009)

A riced out 600hp Camaro is better than a 705hp Photoshopped Camaro that you'll never get back!

(Read: Hennessey)

speeding2fast2c

I think I'm in love!!

bozobuttz

Whatever... I'll believe it when I see it.

ex-SS-ve

rear mounted turbos=
the only thing i like on that package are the wider rear fenders and vent scoop.

Camaro_Nut

There is nothing funny about rear mounted turbos.

JakeRobb

The specs sound good. There's something about the way the car looks that I don't like, and I think it's the black roof. The exposed intercooler and gunmetal wheels aren't really my style either.

Why is this funny?

bossco

Like totally

ex-SS-ve

have never seen a rear mounted turbo car short of a gutted out track car that ran that great. most rear turbo cars are toads! anytime i think or hear twin turbo they are usually under or right behind the manifolds or in close proximity to the motor. not way behind the rear axle

Camaro_Nut

http://www.ststurbo.com/horsepower_tv (194 rwhp gain... sounds like a toad)

2010 Camaro package coming soon!

JakeRobb

It's the less expensive, less complicated option. People who take such options often don't go all out when setting up a car to perform well. They just want a 600hp powertrain so that they can go out and have fun with it.

Ok4thGen

are you sure its a much cheaper option i have a freind in tulsa that when all said and done had about 7 to 8k in his STS kit. but he did do it right.

MarcR94v6

I'm not sure if it's cheaper but it is definitely less complicated, takes up less space under the hood. I would do it to the lt1 if I had the cash and a new tranny.

Bob Cosby

Hurl.

And adding 175 HP to an otherwise stock motor is asking for trouble. How soon depends on how often you abuse it.