2010 - 2015 Camaro News, Sightings, Pictures, and Multimedia All 2010 - 2011 - 2012 - 2013 - 2014 - 2015 Camaro news, photos, and videos

Specs

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-02-2006, 06:53 PM
  #46  
Registered User
 
georgejetson's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 689
Originally Posted by RussStang
So, if you are proposing that a v8 Camaro comes in at under $30k with 400 horses, than I think it is also safe to say that the rumors of a 425hp Challenger around $30k are more than reasonable.
My guess (and this is a semi-educated guess from a guy who watches Ma Mopar fairly closely, not something informed by inside knowledge) is that the 6.1-powered manual-trans Challenger will base around $33k - $34k, and that horsepower-for-horsepower a given trim level of Challenger will cost a couple grand more than an equivalent Camaro or Mustang over the course of its lifecycle.

If I'm off, I'm probably low. I don't see it being cheaper, though I'd love to be proven wrong.

And yeah, the 6.1 isn't going to be the top V8 Hemi for much longer. They are aware of the need to get the Hemi into LS7 territory, and efforts have been underway for awhile.
georgejetson is offline  
Old 12-02-2006, 11:02 PM
  #47  
Registered User
 
Z284ever's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Chicagoland IL
Posts: 16,179
Originally Posted by RussStang
So, if you are proposing that a v8 Camaro comes in at under $30k with 400 horses, than I think it is also safe to say that the rumors of a 425hp Challenger around $30k are more than reasonable. I remember this was the subject of much debate a few months back on here, with many people saying that power level at that price point would never happen. I think it is also a decent bet that if there is a 425hp $30k Challenger, then there may very well be a higher price point, even higher power SRT Challenger in the works, at least some time down the road.

I feel that I might have a better handle on the Camaro than the Challenger - but like I said, just an educated guess. I'll go with georgejetson's thoughts on what a 425 horse Challenger will go for.
Z284ever is offline  
Old 12-02-2006, 11:14 PM
  #48  
Registered User
 
RussStang's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Exton, Pennsylvania
Posts: 3,011
Originally Posted by Z284ever
I feel that I might have a better handle on the Camaro than the Challenger - but like I said, just an educated guess. I'll go with georgejetson's thoughts on what a 425 horse Challenger will go for.

I wasn't trying to imply somehow that you had info on the Challenger. My point was more along the lines of, if GM can do a 400hp Camaro for $30k, then Chrysler can probably pull a Challenger off with similiar price point.
RussStang is offline  
Old 12-02-2006, 11:25 PM
  #49  
Registered User
 
Z284ever's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Chicagoland IL
Posts: 16,179
Originally Posted by RussStang
I wasn't trying to imply somehow that you had info on the Challenger. My point was more along the lines of, if GM can do a 400hp Camaro for $30k, then Chrysler can probably pull a Challenger off with similiar price point.
I'm sure Chrysler could if they wanted to. They just don't want to. I betcha the 6.1 doesn't cost much more, (if at all), than the 5.7. However they can charge more for it...and people will pay it. Just like people pay more for a cheaper to manufacture 5.7 Hemi than the more expensive to manufacture 4.7. I, in fact, am one of those chumps.

Last edited by Z284ever; 12-02-2006 at 11:30 PM.
Z284ever is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Novo
Forced Induction
45
06-14-2016 02:58 AM
93 RedBird
Fuel and Ignition
4
11-15-2015 08:24 AM
cmsmith
2010 - 2015 Camaro News, Sightings, Pictures, and Multimedia
0
09-14-2015 09:09 PM
NewsBot
2010 - 2015 Camaro News, Sightings, Pictures, and Multimedia
0
09-14-2015 09:20 AM
94ZinEdgewater
LT1 Based Engine Tech
6
09-08-2015 09:55 PM



Quick Reply: Specs



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:32 AM.