NEWS: NurburBring It On: 2010 Camaro Cuts a Hot Lap
Ouch and yikes.
Camaro versus Cobalt has essentially become a driver's battle on a road course. A storied V8 nameplate with a history rooted in decades of race history has become a driver's battle with a four cylinder, front wheel drive economy car.
[Allen Iverson]Cobalt? We're talking about a Cobalt here? We're not talking about Mustang or Corvette, we're talking about Cobalt?[/Allen Iverson]
I wonder how the track guys will feel when they have to give a point by to the kid in the Cobalt while driving their 420+ hp performance car. Yikes. Not good.
This also means that the Cobalts will likely slaughter Camaros at the SCCA / NASA autocrosses.
This would be a departure from present. 3rd and 4th gens are handling the Cobalts quite nicely right now (as are the '05+ Mustangs). I'll let you guys do the rest of the math. Ouch. Not good at all.
I expected this but it's extremely sobering to see in print....
Camaro versus Cobalt has essentially become a driver's battle on a road course. A storied V8 nameplate with a history rooted in decades of race history has become a driver's battle with a four cylinder, front wheel drive economy car.
[Allen Iverson]Cobalt? We're talking about a Cobalt here? We're not talking about Mustang or Corvette, we're talking about Cobalt?[/Allen Iverson]
I wonder how the track guys will feel when they have to give a point by to the kid in the Cobalt while driving their 420+ hp performance car. Yikes. Not good.
This also means that the Cobalts will likely slaughter Camaros at the SCCA / NASA autocrosses.
This would be a departure from present. 3rd and 4th gens are handling the Cobalts quite nicely right now (as are the '05+ Mustangs). I'll let you guys do the rest of the math. Ouch. Not good at all.
I expected this but it's extremely sobering to see in print....
Nice time on the Maro , mine will see only street and straightline stuff though , my Cobalt does the twistie stuff
I mean that's great for the Cobalt guys... not so good for the Camaro guys.
Kind of makes me wonder what a Solstice GXP would do with the same engine, bigger tires, better chassis and "right" wheel drive. Is it possible that a Solstice GXP will actually show it's tailights to a Camaro on a road course?
Given the Cobalt's time, I think it's very possible. Once again, good for the Solstice guys, not so good for us.
Honestly... forget disappointed.... what Camaro has become makes me a little angry.
Yep they're fast cars but......... do you really think it is okay that they are only less than 0.5% slower than a brand new 420+ hp Camaro around such a big course like Nurburgring?
I mean that's great for the Cobalt guys... not so good for the Camaro guys.
Kind of makes me wonder what a Solstice GXP would do with the same engine, bigger tires, better chassis and "right" wheel drive. Is it possible that a Solstice GXP will actually show it's tailights to a Camaro on a road course?
Given the Cobalt's time, I think it's very possible. Once again, good for the Solstice guys, not so good for us.
Honestly... forget disappointed.... what Camaro has become makes me a little angry.
I mean that's great for the Cobalt guys... not so good for the Camaro guys.
Kind of makes me wonder what a Solstice GXP would do with the same engine, bigger tires, better chassis and "right" wheel drive. Is it possible that a Solstice GXP will actually show it's tailights to a Camaro on a road course?
Given the Cobalt's time, I think it's very possible. Once again, good for the Solstice guys, not so good for us.
Honestly... forget disappointed.... what Camaro has become makes me a little angry.
8:20 is still a very good and respectable time for what i'm guessing will be a sub-$30k car. I wouldn't exactly label it a "disappointment" and think it's far from that. I think the Cobalt SS is more of an overachiever. It's a very impressive little car that can more than play with the bigger boys. I expect the Solstice gxp to be even quicker.
I'm willing to guess that the Camaro SS tested at Nurburgring wasn't using the final production tune. With almost 7 months before production begins, anyone who doesn't think GM will be tweaking the performance over the next few months is kidding themselves.
. The same Camaro SS will absolutely murder the same 08 Cobalt SS in a straight line race . Ditch the gotta be heavy as hell 20" rims on the Camaro for some ...say , lightweight 18" enkei RPF1's( or some RE30's ...does volk do 5x120?) with a PS2 tire and I think the 0.5% margin would grow nicely without touching a thing on the suspension . Light wheels smaller than Dubs are the 1st thing Im doing to mine . Now , when the Z28 comes out , lets see what the real handling car will do .
Neither does anyone else that drives a Mustang...or a Camaro for that matter.
I think you people need to stop playing Gran Turismo, it's giving you an irrational hard-on about a racetrack. It's not like we don't have any turns or elevation changes here in the states. Oh wait...
I think you people need to stop playing Gran Turismo, it's giving you an irrational hard-on about a racetrack. It's not like we don't have any turns or elevation changes here in the states. Oh wait...
If the supercharged rumors are true, that car will be even heavier than the SS.
well the ZR1 is only ~200 pounds heaver then the z06, whos to say we can't do that we the camaro?
)
8:20?

Cobalt SS - 8:22 - 260 HP / 2975 lbs - .087 HP/lb or 11.4 lbs/HP
Camaro SS - 8:20 - 422 HP / 3860 lbs - .109 HP/lb or 9.15 lbs/HP
CTS-V - 7:59 - 550 HP / ~4100 lbs - .134 HP/lb or 7.45 lbs/HP
C5 Z06 - 7:56 - 405 HP / ~3130 lbs - .129 HP/lb or 7.73 lbs/HP
C6 Z06 - 7:42 - 505 HP / 3130 lbs - .161 HP/lb or 6.20 lbs/HP
C6 ZR1 - 7:26 - 638 HP / ~3350 lbs - .190 HP/lb or 5.25 lbs/HP
Clearly, we see that Power:Weight ratio is important. So theoretically, pour on the power, and it'll make up for the weight (except in the case of the C5 Z06, which beat the CTS-V
). But looking at the spread between times, and HP:weight, it looks like the Camaro should have come in closer to the ~8:00 mark than ~8:20 (maybe ~8:05??
). It's not far enough ahead of the Cobalt, given its huge power advantage (IMO).
Maybe they went back to the "old way" of a standing start?!

Cobalt SS - 8:22 - 260 HP / 2975 lbs - .087 HP/lb or 11.4 lbs/HP
Camaro SS - 8:20 - 422 HP / 3860 lbs - .109 HP/lb or 9.15 lbs/HP
CTS-V - 7:59 - 550 HP / ~4100 lbs - .134 HP/lb or 7.45 lbs/HP
C5 Z06 - 7:56 - 405 HP / ~3130 lbs - .129 HP/lb or 7.73 lbs/HP
C6 Z06 - 7:42 - 505 HP / 3130 lbs - .161 HP/lb or 6.20 lbs/HP
C6 ZR1 - 7:26 - 638 HP / ~3350 lbs - .190 HP/lb or 5.25 lbs/HP
Clearly, we see that Power:Weight ratio is important. So theoretically, pour on the power, and it'll make up for the weight (except in the case of the C5 Z06, which beat the CTS-V
). But looking at the spread between times, and HP:weight, it looks like the Camaro should have come in closer to the ~8:00 mark than ~8:20 (maybe ~8:05??
). It's not far enough ahead of the Cobalt, given its huge power advantage (IMO).Maybe they went back to the "old way" of a standing start?!
Last edited by Capn Pete; Jul 23, 2008 at 04:51 PM.


