2010 - 2015 Camaro News, Sightings, Pictures, and Multimedia All 2010 - 2011 - 2012 - 2013 - 2014 - 2015 Camaro news, photos, and videos

A Muscle Car to the Rescue for General Motors

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jul 10, 2009 | 09:57 AM
  #1  
95redLT1's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 1,505
From: Charleston, WV
A Muscle Car to the Rescue for General Motors

http://www.nytimes.com/2009/07/10/bu...o.html?_r=3&hp
DETROIT — Believe it or not, General Motors has a hit car on its hands.

Amid the gloom of bankruptcy and a miserable market for new vehicles, G.M.’s new Chevrolet Camaro muscle car is winning over consumers looking for a little excitement in a bland landscape of look-alike sedans and watered-down sport utilities.

G.M. sold 9,300 Camaros during the month of June — more than either its entire Buick or Cadillac divisions could muster on their own.

And with G.M. expected to emerge Friday from bankruptcy as a newly constituted company, it is hardly surprising that the Camaro will play a starring role in the company’s coming-out party and news conference at G.M.’s Detroit headquarters.

G.M.’s chief executive, Fritz Henderson, and new chairman, Edward Whitacre, plan to offer the Camaro as proof that a comeback is under way.

A product renaissance, of course, cannot be led solely by a retro-styled sports car that harks back to the horsepower hysteria of the 1960s. But in its short time on the market, the Camaro has brought some much-needed buzz to G.M. showrooms.

“You need excitement at G.M.,” said Joseph Phillippi, a principal in the firm AutoTrends Consulting. “And you certainly need something new.”

The latest edition of the Camaro is tapping into nostalgia some drivers have for the glory days of the American auto industry.

Its long hood, rakish grille and brawny fenders echo the powerful look of the Camaro in its heyday, when G.M., Ford and Chrysler turned out tire-squealing cars that defined Detroit.

While it comes with a big V-8 as an option, the base model has a 6-cylinder engine that gets 22 miles per gallon in combined city and highway driving.

It is also priced for the mainstream buyer — about $23,000 for the base version, and up to $32,000 for the loaded V-8 model.

G.M. began taking orders for the Camaro last fall, and buyers put down deposits on 14,000 of them before the first one was built in March at its plant in Oshawa, Ontario.

“The cars are coming into the dealerships, getting cleaned up and then delivered to customers almost immediately,” said Karen K. Rafferty, a Chevrolet marketing executive.

She said that G.M. had a six-day supply of Camaros nationally; 60 days is considered the norm in the industry.

That level of demand is rare these days, as automakers choke on unsold inventories in the worst market for new vehicles in the United States in more than 25 years.

It has been some time since G.M. could lay claim to having the hottest new vehicle on dealer lots.

The company’s sales in the United States during the first six months of the year were down 40 percent, compared with 35 percent for the overall market.

G.M. has also suffered through an avalanche of negative publicity since it first appealed for financial help from the federal government last fall.

The company has been subsisting on government loans since January, and filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy on June 1. By the end of the year, the Obama administration is expected to have spent $50 billion on rescuing G.M.

G.M. will be radically smaller as a privately held, government-controlled company. Four of its eight divisions, including Saturn and Pontiac, will be sold or closed, and several car and truck models will be discontinued.

With G.M. shrinking, hot products like the Camaro become more critical to its survival.

Chevrolet executives said the car was already providing a halo effect for more conventional Chevrolet products, like the Equinox and Traverse S.U.V.’s (now often called “crossovers” because they are lighter and more fuel-efficient than older sport utility vehicles).

“The car is bringing in people to the showrooms,” Ms. Rafferty said. “They’re looking at a Camaro, but they may end up buying a Traverse.”

The car has also gotten a marketing boost from its featured role in the current blockbuster film “Transformers: Revenge of the Fallen.”

It has been a long road back for the Camaro, which had its debut in 1966 but was dropped from G.M.’s lineup in 2002.

G.M.’s product comeback could get help from a decision by Robert A. Lutz, its long-time car czar, to stay with the company rather than retire at the end of the year. Mr. Lutz, an early supporter of bringing back the Camaro, is expected to announce Friday that he will remain with G.M. in an unspecified executive capacity, according to a person familiar with his decisions.

G.M. has consistently declined to reveal its sales targets for the Camaro, which ranked as the 13th-best-selling car in the country in June and outsold its traditional rival, the Ford Mustang.

G.M.’s senior executives are loath to make sales projections, particularly for a niche car like the Camaro that can fall out of favor just as quickly.

“We’ve been told rather strongly by top management not to put a number out there,” said Terry Rhadigan, a G.M. spokesman.

But G.M.’s dealers are less reserved.

“Interest has been phenomenal,” said Paul W. Doddridge, owner of Connell Chevrolet in Costa Mesa, Calif. “It’s the best car they have come out with in years.”

One of his first customers was Scott Wilbur, a 40-year-old elementary school principal who bought a silver V-8 Camaro in June.

Mr. Wilbur had not purchased a G.M. vehicle in a decade, and traded in his Honda Civic hybrid to buy the Camaro.

He even gave up his California-issued sticker to drive in hybrid-only carpool lanes to get behind the wheel of his new muscle car.

“I might not be as environmentally friendly, but at this point I don’t mind waiting in traffic to drive this,” he said.

Mr. Wilbur said the Camaro has improved his impression of G.M. to the point where he has put a deposit down on a Chevrolet Volt, the hybrid-electric model due out next year.
Old Jul 10, 2009 | 10:24 AM
  #2  
Camaro25thann's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 140
From: Chattanooga, TN
With this type of success, if it can continue, I think it won't be long until the 'official' announcement of the Z/28
Old Jul 10, 2009 | 10:48 AM
  #3  
Bob Cosby's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 1998
Posts: 3,252
From: Knoxville, TN
...G.M. will be radically smaller as a privately held, government-controlled company....
I'm sorry, but I'll just never agree with or get used to that. It is sad what we have become.

Bob
Old Jul 10, 2009 | 10:51 AM
  #4  
guionM's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 13,713
From: The Golden State
I've said it before. Camaro represents the way GM should have been doing product development.

*No focus group, simply put the car out there on the auto show circuit and get reaction from the general public.

*Make a quick decision & forget comittees. If the public loves the car, MAKE the numbers work, then get the thing into development.

*Take shortcuts to get the thing into production that don't compromise quality. You don't need a frigging meeting to debate the level of quality materials you need to put into the interior. If it's costed out in the begining, it will tend to take care of itself the way Ford and import brands do.

*Finally, get the thing to market within 24-36 months of showing the thing. Sure the Camaro took 37 months. But it had to deal with the old GM, and had to be done in Australia in order to avoid the GM-NA's tendancy to gut and stall projects. A streamlined GM without the massive bureaucracy could easily get something done quickly.


It's extremely ironic that the car that is outselling the entire Buick division, is also a car that GM would have never made under the system that existed before just a month ago. Camaro had to surface virturally in secret at GM, had to be rammed through approval once it debuted at Detroit's auto show (Lutz and company began development even before it was approved... even almost before the paint was dry on the concept), and there was those (the same folks that helped kill the RWD Impala) that attempted to derail the Camaro.

It's also ironic that the car that's become a symbol of the new GM isn't the Chevrolet Volt... a car that has adsorbed a huge amount of GM's resources in both manpower and money, and has also played a role in either killing off or delaying GM projects that fell much in line with Camaro's... yet a car that went through GM in the most unconventional way, wasn't even created in the US, and as far as new car development costs go, cost GM very little to next to nothing to create and get to market (at this rate, Camaro should pay for itself in 2 years or less).

Until the redone Fusion came out, the Mustang was the symbol of Ford and one of their top models.

At Chrysler, the Challenger is the car that is still in demand of everything Chrysler makes.

At GM, the Camaro is quickly becoming a symbol of GM's rebirth.

And we're in the mist of the worst recession in at least a generation.

This was the same thing that happened in the late 70s.

Recession. High fuel prices. Supposed new tough government regulations.

And the highest Camaro and Firebird sales in history & massive Mustang sales.
Old Jul 10, 2009 | 10:55 AM
  #5  
guionM's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 13,713
From: The Golden State
Originally Posted by Bob Cosby
I'm sorry, but I'll just never agree with or get used to that. It is sad what we have become.

Bob
One thing you can't deny, though.

GM has finally gotten better.

Lower labor costs, shedding layers of bureacracy, finally getting itself to the point it can make decisions quickly... or even make decisions at all, the ability to make money selling fewer cars.

None of which it was previously able.... or even willing... to fix on it's own.
Old Jul 10, 2009 | 11:24 AM
  #6  
99SilverSS's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 3,463
From: SoCal
If someone would have told me 10 or even 8 years ago that GM would be bankrupt and government subsidized and that the Chevrolet Camaro was leading the company's return I would have fallen over. I still might!

For me the irony is just incredible because of how the Camaro was left for dead and what it took for GM to realize how much they needed this car and now must have it.
For me GM's new found embrace of the Camaro is more amazing than even it just returning at all.

Guy we're on the same page. Remember what the Viper did for Chrysler in their early 90's rebirth. These cars can move more number than just their own sales.
Old Jul 10, 2009 | 03:08 PM
  #7  
Bob Cosby's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 1998
Posts: 3,252
From: Knoxville, TN
Originally Posted by guionM
One thing you can't deny, though.

GM has finally gotten better.

Lower labor costs, shedding layers of bureacracy, finally getting itself to the point it can make decisions quickly... or even make decisions at all, the ability to make money selling fewer cars.

None of which it was previously able.... or even willing... to fix on it's own.
All that remains to be seen, does it not? And it still doesn't make it right....or the right thing to do.
Old Jul 10, 2009 | 03:54 PM
  #8  
BIG B7887's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 185
From: Pewaukee, WI
Originally Posted by 99SilverSS
...For me the irony is just incredible because of how the Camaro was left for dead and what it took for GM to realize how much they needed this car and now must have it.
For me GM's new found embrace of the Camaro is more amazing than even it just returning at all.
I think your statement is a little off here...like Guy said, it was essentially ramrodded down the beancounters' throats; they never really did realize how much they needed the car, or the others...
Old Jul 10, 2009 | 05:30 PM
  #9  
99SilverSS's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 3,463
From: SoCal
Originally Posted by BIG B7887
I think your statement is a little off here...like Guy said, it was essentially ramrodded down the beancounters' throats; they never really did realize how much they needed the car, or the others...
Certainly in the begining before the NAIAS 2006 there was a short period of time when GM brass might have kept the car on the side but not so after the public response to the concept car. If you read some of the books about the development of the Camaro and what took place before the silver concept in 2005 and then how much happened afterward in development it would be more than fair to say GM embraced the car.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
CARiD
Supporting Vendor Group Purchases and Sales
0
Dec 26, 2014 04:20 AM
ChrisFrez
2010 - 2015 Camaro News, Sightings, Pictures, and Multimedia
2
Dec 7, 2014 11:32 AM
NewsBot
2010 - 2015 Camaro News, Sightings, Pictures, and Multimedia
0
Dec 3, 2014 12:30 PM
USAirman93
General 1967-2002 F-Body Tech
4
Nov 24, 2014 03:37 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:08 PM.