More Power for 2011 Mustang, will Camaro respond?
I just saw on autoblog that the 2011 mustang is allegedly getting 412 horse power.
http://www.autoblog.com/2009/12/17/2...power-5-0l-v8/
Without knowing final weight, it will probably be pretty close to the camaro speed numbers.
The mustang has a good package going on now with the added power, improved interior materials, sync and new exterior.
What would the camaro do next? I cannot wait to find out how GM responds. What do you guys think GM should do? Nothing, the new features (cooled seats, hud, backup sensonrs, etc) are enough, GM needs to upgrade the interior and offer sat nav or something better?
Competition is great and hopefully will make a better camaro for all of us!! I am excited to see how things shape up for the future.
http://www.autoblog.com/2009/12/17/2...power-5-0l-v8/
Without knowing final weight, it will probably be pretty close to the camaro speed numbers.
The mustang has a good package going on now with the added power, improved interior materials, sync and new exterior.
What would the camaro do next? I cannot wait to find out how GM responds. What do you guys think GM should do? Nothing, the new features (cooled seats, hud, backup sensonrs, etc) are enough, GM needs to upgrade the interior and offer sat nav or something better?
Competition is great and hopefully will make a better camaro for all of us!! I am excited to see how things shape up for the future.
Yes, to some the solid axle is preferred the IRS, but that is the exception and not the rule. The car has to be built for the buying requirements of the majority of the market segment. This is why you cannot buy a top fuel funny car off a showroom floor. Think about the percentage of 2010 Camaro buyers who plan to take their car for a spirited drive down a curvy road once in a while and never take it to a drag strip. Compare that number to the percentage of the buyers who buy the car to be a drag racer.
Or in other words, if there was a solid axle option, a very low percentage or 2010 Camaro buyers would choose it. It would be cool to see, though!
The pros? It keeps the Camaro current with market trends and it rides and handles better. This is what the majority of 2010 Camaro buyers want.
Yes, to some the solid axle is preferred the IRS, but that is the exception and not the rule. The car has to be built for the buying requirements of the majority of the market segment. This is why you cannot buy a top fuel funny car off a showroom floor. Think about the percentage of 2010 Camaro buyers who plan to take their car for a spirited drive down a curvy road once in a while and never take it to a drag strip. Compare that number to the percentage of the buyers who buy the car to be a drag racer.
Or in other words, if there was a solid axle option, a very low percentage or 2010 Camaro buyers would choose it. It would be cool to see, though!
Yes, to some the solid axle is preferred the IRS, but that is the exception and not the rule. The car has to be built for the buying requirements of the majority of the market segment. This is why you cannot buy a top fuel funny car off a showroom floor. Think about the percentage of 2010 Camaro buyers who plan to take their car for a spirited drive down a curvy road once in a while and never take it to a drag strip. Compare that number to the percentage of the buyers who buy the car to be a drag racer.
Or in other words, if there was a solid axle option, a very low percentage or 2010 Camaro buyers would choose it. It would be cool to see, though!
There is a lot that GM can do to further refine the Camaro and keep it right in the fight with a lighter and now very closely powered Mustang.
Personally I think GM should offer a track pack type option for the SS. Tighten up the suspension to a more aggressive level and better utilize the IRS. Add 3.73 gears as the LS3 6M could use the extra gear. Then offer another exhaust option that could save some weight and pick up some HP. Advertise the power at 435-440hp and call it 1LE.
Personally I think GM should offer a track pack type option for the SS. Tighten up the suspension to a more aggressive level and better utilize the IRS. Add 3.73 gears as the LS3 6M could use the extra gear. Then offer another exhaust option that could save some weight and pick up some HP. Advertise the power at 435-440hp and call it 1LE.
I agree with the better exhaust option. Hearing the weight loss from going to a better flowing exhaust is impressive. I really think tweaking the suspension more, change of exhaust, adding a CAI, and lighter wheels would make for a great package.


