2010 - 2015 Camaro News, Sightings, Pictures, and Multimedia All 2010 - 2011 - 2012 - 2013 - 2014 - 2015 Camaro news, photos, and videos

Car and Driver says Camaro SS faster than 2011 5.0 Mustang?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Apr 30, 2010 | 12:43 AM
  #16  
99SilverSS's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 3,463
From: SoCal
I've said for a while the 5.0GT vs. SS would be a drivers race. The GT has the power to weight ratio and optional better gearing and equal tires but the LS3 has 30 more ft lbs to make up some of the difference.
Old Apr 30, 2010 | 08:21 AM
  #17  
Adam4356's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 176
From: Cleveland, OH
Not quite the blowout some intially assumed. Interesting, very close. The cars will run together, now we have to see what the drivers do.
Old Apr 30, 2010 | 02:29 PM
  #18  
JakeRobb's Avatar
Super Moderator
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 9,507
From: Okemos, MI
Originally Posted by Chevycobb
what is "broken in"? 100 miles? 5000? 10000?
Remains to be seen for the Coyote, but LS engines tend to perform better after about 5k miles. The 2010 Camaros making the magazine/newspaper review circuit certainly have at least that many miles on them by now.
Old Apr 30, 2010 | 02:36 PM
  #19  
besz28's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 721
From: hudson,florida
new motortrend has the new mustang going 12.8 in the quarter at 110.8 and 0-60 in 4.3.
Old Apr 30, 2010 | 03:20 PM
  #20  
Z28Wilson's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 6,165
From: Sterling Heights, MI
Originally Posted by besz28
new motortrend has the new mustang going 12.8 in the quarter at 110.8 and 0-60 in 4.3.
Actually this isn't new, it's last month's test....but it does show the potential of the car if the MT goons can get it running that quick....
Old May 1, 2010 | 11:09 AM
  #21  
graham's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 1999
Posts: 2,887
From: northeast Miss.
Looks like Ford has Wednesday and Friday cars just like we do.
Old May 1, 2010 | 02:23 PM
  #22  
JakeRobb's Avatar
Super Moderator
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 9,507
From: Okemos, MI
Originally Posted by graham
Looks like Ford has Wednesday and Friday cars just like we do.
Different drivers, different days, different tracks, and every possibility of it being the same car. You can hardly make that assumption.
Old May 2, 2010 | 02:38 PM
  #23  
1fastdog's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 1,808
From: FL/MI
Originally Posted by graham
Looks like Ford has Wednesday and Friday cars just like we do.
Mmmm, the motors are not built on the same day as the car...

You are kinda losing me here.

The early hubub was that the 5.0 was a total overdog car.

Where did that thinking wander off to?

Has Chicken Little wandered off the set again?

Did the mag dyno this car? That would be interesting. Roller up every one of these to see what actually is going to be expected of the production line cars. Early talk was that Ford had vastly underrated the '11 5.0. Where did that "fact" go?

Last edited by 1fastdog; May 2, 2010 at 02:55 PM.
Old May 2, 2010 | 04:43 PM
  #24  
Bob Cosby's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 1998
Posts: 3,252
From: Knoxville, TN
I think that was based off of one dyno test that the hardcore Mustang nutswingers got all excited about, and those of us that prefer Mustangs - but still have some bit of objectivity left, figured it was highly likely that that particular test was....to quote a cliche'.....too good to be true.

Looks like we're going to see most of them dyno in the 365-375 RWHP range. Still quite stout.
Old May 2, 2010 | 07:29 PM
  #25  
JasonD's Avatar
Admin Emeritus
 
Joined: Dec 1997
Posts: 11,157
From: Nashville, TN area
We talked about this in CamaroZ28.Com Podcast Episode #243.
Old May 3, 2010 | 12:39 AM
  #26  
graham's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 1999
Posts: 2,887
From: northeast Miss.
Originally Posted by 1fastdog
Mmmm, the motors are not built on the same day as the car...

You are kinda losing me here.
Easy easy easy Dog It's just a lil humor rather than an attempt of explanation.

"Wednesday Car" is just a nickname, possibly a redneck nickname for a car that, for no explainable reason, seems to be a little faster than another equal car (year, engine, options, trim level ect). "Monday they go to work with a hangover, Friday they are ready to get off work for the weekend, and Wednesday they build 'em right." Hence "Wednesday car."
Old May 3, 2010 | 07:38 AM
  #27  
1fastdog's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 1,808
From: FL/MI
Originally Posted by Bob Cosby
I think that was based off of one dyno test that the hardcore Mustang nutswingers got all excited about, and those of us that prefer Mustangs - but still have some bit of objectivity left, figured it was highly likely that that particular test was....to quote a cliche'.....too good to be true.

Looks like we're going to see most of them dyno in the 365-375 RWHP range. Still quite stout.
Yep. Stout is a good description.

Also, one test does not a tend make.

Should be fun to see how it all plays out.
Old May 3, 2010 | 07:39 AM
  #28  
1fastdog's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 1,808
From: FL/MI
Originally Posted by graham
Easy easy easy Dog It's just a lil humor rather than an attempt of explanation.

"Wednesday Car" is just a nickname, possibly a redneck nickname for a car that, for no explainable reason, seems to be a little faster than another equal car (year, engine, options, trim level ect). "Monday they go to work with a hangover, Friday they are ready to get off work for the weekend, and Wednesday they build 'em right." Hence "Wednesday car."
I'm with ya..

At this point, folks are just happy to have a job. When I've been in plants on a Friday, folks seem to be just as dialled in to getting it right

Last edited by 1fastdog; May 3, 2010 at 07:46 AM.
Old May 16, 2010 | 12:44 PM
  #29  
Andy30thZ's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 118
I know this post is stock for stock.....but I thought this was interesting.
Evolution Performance is running 11.65 @ 118mph with supposed bolt ons, at least thats what they are saying.
almost 118mph with off-road pipe, catback, drop in air filter, tune, upper/lower control arms, panhard brace, strengthening torque box, and tires. But I am going by what is said by them.
The did have a great driver and full drag wheels and rubber.

If this is for real and not some magazine ringer...... Hell, that's no mods at all to run that kind of mph...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5Qc4Xb7G1ck

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-B4aWSx_LY8
Old May 16, 2010 | 10:46 PM
  #30  
graham's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 1999
Posts: 2,887
From: northeast Miss.
After all this time they are still having to strengthen the torque boxes?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:05 PM.