2010 - 2015 Camaro News, Sightings, Pictures, and Multimedia All 2010 - 2011 - 2012 - 2013 - 2014 - 2015 Camaro news, photos, and videos
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Camaro X vs. Mustang GT500

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-08-2006, 11:34 PM
  #31  
Registered User
 
V8 Slayer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Long Island, NY
Posts: 794
Re: Camaro X vs. Mustang GT500

Originally Posted by theroad64

SRT-4 vs SS Cobalt--this I know the least about, but what I do know is the SRT4 has a sixty HP advantage at the crank.
Plus, staged factory upgrades available..
V8 Slayer is offline  
Old 01-08-2006, 11:39 PM
  #32  
Registered User
 
Diognes56's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Peoria, IL
Posts: 352
Re: Camaro X vs. Mustang GT500

I think the top Camaro will be more than a match for the GT500, I don't think we need to worry about that. My guess is that it will be supercharged. I know Chevrolet doesn't need a supercharger to beat the GT500, but I think the Camaro is more likely to get a supercharger than the LS7. Also, if the rumors of the Vette going supercharged are true, I think that would make it that much more likely that the Camaro will get one too.

I would love for there to be a limited run of new 427 Yenko Camaros though.


(I know it is a little quick and sloppy but you guys get the idea)

David
Diognes56 is offline  
Old 01-08-2006, 11:40 PM
  #33  
Registered User
 
91Z28350's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 1,011
Re: Camaro X vs. Mustang GT500

That looks BAD-***! Nice Job.
91Z28350 is offline  
Old 01-09-2006, 02:15 AM
  #34  
Registered User
 
RussStang's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Exton, Pennsylvania
Posts: 3,011
Re: Camaro X vs. Mustang GT500

Originally Posted by theroad64
SRT-4 vs SS Cobalt--this I know the least about, but what I do know is the SRT4 has a sixty HP advantage at the crank.
What you know is wrong. SRT-4s dyno typically around 225-230 horses at the wheels. Cobalt SSs typically dyno around 200-205 horses at the wheels. I think (rather, I know) there is a big advantage to the SRT-4 in a heads up race, but I don't know where you are getting this 60 crank hp bullsh*t from. Two equal drivers, SRT-4 will win everytime, but your info is wrong.
RussStang is offline  
Old 01-09-2006, 02:35 AM
  #35  
Registered User
 
theroad64's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: The desert(for now)
Posts: 238
Re: Camaro X vs. Mustang GT500

Thirty HP. Sue me.
theroad64 is offline  
Old 01-09-2006, 05:01 AM
  #36  
Registered User
 
DrewSG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Ft. Lauderdale, FL
Posts: 627
Re: Camaro X vs. Mustang GT500

Originally Posted by PacerX
SRT-8 vs. GTO = GTO
SRT-6 vs. Base Vette = Vette
SRT-4 vs. Cobalt SS = Dead heat.

.
DrewSG is offline  
Old 01-09-2006, 05:36 AM
  #37  
Registered User
 
SSbaby's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 3,123
Re: Camaro X vs. Mustang GT500

As much as I love the Mustang... and admire Ford's lead in the pony car revival (yes, exciting times ahead) there is no way I would seriously consider a Ford with the 5.4L engine. That huge undersquare design really is an unfortunate mistake... anyway, since when have Ford produced better V8 engines than GM, Chrysler? I don't believe they ever have... Camaro would have the powertrain advantage should GM want to exploit that opportunity.
SSbaby is offline  
Old 01-09-2006, 08:15 AM
  #38  
Registered User
 
pickardracing's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: Two Rivers, WI
Posts: 368
Re: Camaro X vs. Mustang GT500

Originally Posted by SSbaby
there is no way I would seriously consider a Ford with the 5.4L engine. That huge undersquare design really is an unfortunate mistake... anyway
Why do you say that?
pickardracing is offline  
Old 01-09-2006, 09:14 AM
  #39  
Registered User
 
SFireGT98's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Orlando, FL USA
Posts: 1,232
Re: Camaro X vs. Mustang GT500

One thing to keep in mind when talking 4th gen vs SN95 stangs is that the 4th gen had ZERO funding its final years. Had GM wanted to up the ante in the performance wars, an LS6 is all it would have taken to compete with the Cobra. However the 4th gen's death bell had already rung, so no chance.

Now things I have a feeling are going to be different. The horsepower ceiling at Chevy is officially going through the roof with the new Z06 and rumors of even more powerful Vette. And the new Camaro isnt the dead in the water 4th gen, its a brand new generation that I'm sure GM has every intention of seeing it succeed, through sales and horsepower. Not saying its gonna stomp the mustang, but I believe there will be a Camaro for every Mustang power level.
SFireGT98 is offline  
Old 01-09-2006, 09:38 AM
  #40  
Registered User
 
HOTCIVIC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Minneapolis
Posts: 279
Re: Camaro X vs. Mustang GT500

First of all, you guys need to stop comparing the top of the line Camaro against modded 03 Cobras. That **** is just stupid. The base Camaro will have at least 400 HP and that will be enough to bitchslap the **** out of the Mustang GT. That said, the key to a Z28 or SS competing with the GT500 is weight. If they can keep the weight around 3500 pounds, I guarantee it will be able to compete with the GT500 which is coming in at 3900 pounds for the coupe and over 4000 pounds for the vert.

Those of you who don't think we would put an LS7 in the Camaro or you don't think they would make a blown LS2 or L92 because it would have as much power as the Z06 at 500+ or more than the base C6, come on now. You damn well know the C6 is going to have at least 425 to 450 HP by the time the Camaro comes out, and the Z06 will have more than 505. **** they are just putting long tube headers on the Z06 and seeing 500 AT THE WHEELS. The LS7 is choked up from the factory and the Z06 better damn well have more than 505 HP by 2008 or 2009 if it wants to keep competing with the Viper.

Really though, I could really give a **** if the Camaro is faster or slower than the GT500, because I know that I will have a Camaro, and I will mod it either way to make it faster than it comes from the factory.
HOTCIVIC is offline  
Old 01-09-2006, 10:07 AM
  #41  
Registered User
 
Abidar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: NC STATE
Posts: 325
Re: Camaro X vs. Mustang GT500

Originally Posted by pickardracing
Agreed.

You guys that **** and moan about a supercharger need to get a clue.

Supercharging gives you more efficient power, greater streetability, and better efficiency than a comparably powered NA car.

Christ. Anything to **** and moan.

I'm not arguing, I'm just saying it took em 5+ years to catch up

I'm all for more powerful mustangs, as much as I dislike them. I wanna see a horsepower race, because I know GM will win
Abidar is offline  
Old 01-09-2006, 06:38 PM
  #42  
Registered User
 
bossco's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: SeVa
Posts: 2,977
Re: Camaro X vs. Mustang GT500

Originally Posted by SSbaby
That huge undersquare design really is an unfortunate mistake.
you guys are reading to much into that, the 3 and 4 valve engines address the problem sufficiently. Ford's big problem is displacement
bossco is offline  
Old 01-09-2006, 06:57 PM
  #43  
Registered User
 
Jackass's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Metairie La.
Posts: 269
Re: Camaro X vs. Mustang GT500

Originally Posted by bossco
you guys are reading to much into that, the 3 and 4 valve engines address the problem sufficiently. Ford's big problem is displacement
Exactly. Wasn't the Hurricane program supposed to be an 6+ L engine?

Forget about a LS2. They are being replaced by the L92 (6.2L). Another thing there is no way that their will be a 400 hp base Camaro. GM is not about to build a 400 hp V6.
Jackass is offline  
Old 01-09-2006, 08:08 PM
  #44  
Registered User
 
Diesel151Z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: San Antonio
Posts: 24
Re: Camaro X vs. Mustang GT500

Sure sure, the top camaro will prolly run over the new gt's, but how much do you think the new camaro will cost? Not sure what the Z/28 cost new in 02, but I know an optioned SS went for about 35-36. So I would guess the Z was like 31 maybe? Seeing as I just paid $28K for a fully optioned 06 GT, I don't think the camaro price will even be close to that. Yes I had camaro's all my life, but I'll tell you what, the new GT drives much better than my 02 SS. I never thought I would say I own a mustang, but Ford is definitely doing something right. I have to say I think Ford did a much better job at the retro styling as well...the tail lights and the old vette style gauges in the middle? Not my cup of tea.

Last edited by Diesel151Z; 01-09-2006 at 08:12 PM.
Diesel151Z is offline  
Old 01-09-2006, 08:18 PM
  #45  
Registered User
 
Kris93/95Z28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Bentonville, AR
Posts: 1,451
Re: Camaro X vs. Mustang GT500

Originally Posted by Diesel151Z
Sure sure, the top camaro will prolly run over the new gt's, but how much do you think the new camaro will cost? Not sure what the Z/28 cost new in 02, but I know an optioned SS went for about 35-36.
So I would guess the Z was like 31 maybe?
From Gizoogle:
Coupe and convertible models are available. And they come in base and Z28 trim. The base coupe lists for $18,080, the convertible for $26,075. Z28 models retail for $22,495 for the coupe, and $29,590 for the Z28 convertible.

To hear real V8 thunder, you must opt for the Z28, with 5.7-liters of 310 horsepower prime mover. We called it a 350 in the olden, pre-metric, days. No matter what you call it, it rumbles. The Z28 also adds the appropriate performance suspension, along with a heavy-duty automatic transmission and power steering cooler. Like the base Camaro, the Z28 has grown wider tires this year: big, sticky P245/50ZR16 Goodyear Eagle RSAs. The Z28 convertible gets a six-way power driver's seat. A six-speed manual gearbox is offered as a no-charge option.

An SS Performance/Appearance Package ($3625) is available for the Z28 models. SS ups the horsepower ante to 325, thanks in part to forced-air induction and a wide-mouth, low restriction, dual-outlet exhaust. An SS-only rear spoiler adorns the back deck. Big 17-inch aluminum wheels shod with enormous P275/40ZR17 speed-rated Goodyear Eagle F1 tires are mounted on the corners. They complement a High-Performance Ride and Handling Package that further stiffens the Z28 suspension with beefier shock and spring rates.

If that's not quite enough, SS buyers can add the 35th Anniversary Package ($2500), featuring traction control, a Hurst short-throw shifter, and a 12-disc CD changer. All 35th Anniversary Camaros will be painted Bright Rallye Red and decorated with broad silver racing stripes; black-accented, machined-face alloy wheels; special identification; and ebony leather with gray inserts for the interior.

Seeing as I just paid $28K for a fully optioned 06 GT, I don't think the camaro price will even be close to that.
Now how much would have to pay to get back the extra 50 horsepower & 50 ft lbs of torque the LS1 offered over your 2006 GT in 2002?

Yes I had camaro's all my life, but I'll tell you what, the new GT drives much better than my 02 SS.
I am glad you like your car, and I hope you enjoy it for many years to come. BTW: I would hope a fresh platform, built in 2005 would out class the Camaro that was pretty much the same in 2002 as the first one that rolled off the line in 1982.

Last edited by Kris93/95Z28; 01-09-2006 at 08:21 PM.
Kris93/95Z28 is offline  


Quick Reply: Camaro X vs. Mustang GT500



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:37 PM.