2010 - 2015 Camaro News, Sightings, Pictures, and Multimedia All 2010 - 2011 - 2012 - 2013 - 2014 - 2015 Camaro news, photos, and videos

0-60=4.7

Old Feb 19, 2009 | 02:20 PM
  #91  
1fastdog's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 1,808
From: FL/MI
Originally Posted by christianjax


So....uh....anyone think the new Camaro can go from 0-60?....at all?

or better yet,

Is we is, or is we ain't, gonna talk about the Camaro going from 0-60?

Yes, it goes from 0-60 and beyond. Without regard to what you call the thingees the lugnuts keep attached.
Old Feb 19, 2009 | 02:25 PM
  #92  
christianjax's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 881
From: Jacksonville Florida
Originally Posted by 1fastdog
Yes, it goes from 0-60 and beyond. Without regard to what you call the thingees the lugnuts keep attached.
Well that's a relief. I was affraid my new 426hp SS was going to top out around 57mph. Rumor has it that it will reach 60mph in 4.7 seconds.
Anyone else hear that?
Old Feb 19, 2009 | 03:10 PM
  #93  
2010_5thgen's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 4,482
From: ohio
isnt that the same 0-60 as the g8 gxp? if that is the same, wouldnt it be a little quicker due to the fact it has wider tires(better grab) and isnt it a little lighter than the gxp?
Old Feb 19, 2009 | 03:22 PM
  #94  
Bob Cosby's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 1998
Posts: 3,252
From: Knoxville, TN
I don't think "everyone" was slamming you for using "rim" vice "wheel". I certainly don't care.

And dammit.....its "straight" not "strait"! Dont you no inglish?
Old Feb 19, 2009 | 08:56 PM
  #95  
GMRL's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 307
Originally Posted by ZZtop
Be careful giving such a large rpm range. 1000rpm versus 1500rpm is a HUGE difference in 6th gear.

Are you telling me that you shift to 6th gear at 45mph? I want you to go do this on your way out to lunch or home from work and tell me you think it is just fine and not lugging the engine.

Where I live we have LONG FLAT roads, Ive done it countless time, I dont make it a habit of cruising around like that. But when you have 5-8 mile to drive at 45MPH on flat road with traffic moving steadily, its fine to do so. If I need to accelerate, I go down a couple gears. To me lugging would be to try to go from 45-75 in 6th at the same rate that you would do it from a lower gear.
Old Feb 20, 2009 | 07:13 AM
  #96  
ZZtop's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 1,217
From: Greenville, SC
Well maybe its because I live in South Carolina and there is no such thing as flat roads. Everything is hilly it seams. Even the highways are like rolling hills.
Old Feb 20, 2009 | 07:16 AM
  #97  
christianjax's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 881
From: Jacksonville Florida
We have hills here in North Florida, thier called Ant Hills.
Old Feb 21, 2009 | 08:39 AM
  #98  
Bearcat Steve's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 210
From: Cincinnati, OH
In Cincinnati, there is no such thing as a flat road or a straight road -- except Straight Street in the Clifton area. Of course, Straight Street is so steep that even if one has 4-wheel drive and chains, one can't drive up it with two or more inches of snow.
Old Feb 26, 2009 | 10:50 PM
  #99  
Capn Pete's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 5,308
From: Oshawa - Home of the 5th-gen
Um, how come nobody corrected the part about a cable drive speedometer??? Those haven't been used in most GM cars since the late ~80's / early 90's?!?

Originally Posted by Bob Cosby
Does the speedo lag? Is it cable-operated or digital?
Originally Posted by christianjax
cable. Most speedo's lag.
Originally Posted by Bob Cosby
Really? Hmm...if it is a cable, then it would have to be mechanical linkage, right? Is the lag caused by the cable twisting prior to moving? How much lag is there?

Seriously curious...would love to see documentation of this.
Originally Posted by christianjax
Can't help you with documentation. Just what I've been told.
A T56 uses an electrical speed sensor, and I'd bet dollars to donuts that the T6060 does too . Since we're into correcting mistakes in this thread and all .

Last edited by Capn Pete; Feb 26, 2009 at 11:22 PM.
Old Feb 27, 2009 | 06:52 AM
  #100  
Wild Willy's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 439
From: upstate New York
If I can get away from language (and I do agree that English is wonderful, and can be very precise, with many synonyms) two points: Way back in the beginning, someone accused GM of underrating HP, and I think that is accurate- the SAE ratings would guarantee a minimum HP rating, i.e., this car produces 'at least' XX HP- Ford and Toyota have both been sued for their (not there, not they're) vehicles not producing advertised HP numbers- hence a motive to rate the HP conservatively- that was claimed on the 4th gen cars, because of identical heads, cams, etc- and GM not wanting to steal the limelight from the Corvette- So, yes, underrating is common, and happens- would you complain if you bought a car that was rated 350 HP and it actually produced 365 HP? Not likely, you would think you got a bargain-

On the cable speedo, and lag- well, two things- by federal law, all speedo are required to be optimistic- they can read high, but never low- you can't be pulled over by a cop for going 65 and say that "my speedo only read 60" However, when your speedo reads 60, you most likely are in fact going 58 or 59- And I haven't seen a cable speedo or odometer in over 2 decades- with the advent of all the electronically controlled transmissions everything uses a vehicle speed sensor, and you change the programing, rather than using different gears in the tail of the transmission matched to the rear axle ratios- used to be they were color coded- they used to even sell adapters for trucks when you went to big tires-

Yeah, V-box rules- it's a GPS world- and I will be 55 this year- been doing this for quite a while- I still know how to set the dwell on points and change the weights in a distributor-
Old Feb 28, 2009 | 03:33 PM
  #101  
Red89GTA's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 589
From: Flounderville, MI, USA
Originally Posted by 2010_5thgen
isnt that the same 0-60 as the g8 gxp? if that is the same, wouldnt it be a little quicker due to the fact it has wider tires(better grab) and isnt it a little lighter than the gxp?

I think that the GXP has a 3:70 rear end compared to the Camaro's 3:45, so that will probably take car of the weight difference. I wish they would have put the 6-speed into the GT, the GXP is just too much $$ and more engine than I would want for my 4 door DD. Esp since it seems to gets much worse mileage.

BTW:
https://www.camaroz28.com/forums/sho...wheels+vs+rims

Old Mar 1, 2009 | 07:03 AM
  #102  
christianjax's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 881
From: Jacksonville Florida
Originally Posted by Wild *****
If I can get away from language (and I do agree that English is wonderful, and can be very precise, with many synonyms) two points: Way back in the beginning, someone accused GM of underrating HP, and I think that is accurate- the SAE ratings would guarantee a minimum HP rating, i.e., this car produces 'at least' XX HP- Ford and Toyota have both been sued for their (not there, not they're) vehicles not producing advertised HP numbers- hence a motive to rate the HP conservatively- that was claimed on the 4th gen cars, because of identical heads, cams, etc- and GM not wanting to steal the limelight from the Corvette- So, yes, underrating is common, and happens- would you complain if you bought a car that was rated 350 HP and it actually produced 365 HP? Not likely, you would think you got a bargain-

On the cable speedo, and lag- well, two things- by federal law, all speedo are required to be optimistic- they can read high, but never low- you can't be pulled over by a cop for going 65 and say that "my speedo only read 60" However, when your speedo reads 60, you most likely are in fact going 58 or 59- And I haven't seen a cable speedo or odometer in over 2 decades- with the advent of all the electronically controlled transmissions everything uses a vehicle speed sensor, and you change the programing, rather than using different gears in the tail of the transmission matched to the rear axle ratios- used to be they were color coded- they used to even sell adapters for trucks when you went to big tires-

Yeah, V-box rules- it's a GPS world- and I will be 55 this year- been doing this for quite a while- I still know how to set the dwell on points and change the weights in a distributor-
so.......in a nutshell, I'm right.
Old Mar 2, 2009 | 10:20 AM
  #103  
2010_5thgen's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 4,482
From: ohio
Originally Posted by Red89GTA
I think that the GXP has a 3:70 rear end compared to the Camaro's 3:45, so that will probably take car of the weight difference. I wish they would have put the 6-speed into the GT, the GXP is just too much $$ and more engine than I would want for my 4 door DD. Esp since it seems to gets much worse mileage.

BTW:
https://www.camaroz28.com/forums/sho...wheels+vs+rims

call it what YOU want. ill call it what I want.
Old Mar 2, 2009 | 10:24 AM
  #104  
Capn Pete's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 5,308
From: Oshawa - Home of the 5th-gen
Originally Posted by christianjax
so.......in a nutshell, I'm right.
About what?! The speedometer lag part? Sure, they lag, I think most people realize that . The cable speedometer part? Nope!
Old Mar 2, 2009 | 11:18 AM
  #105  
christianjax's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 881
From: Jacksonville Florida
Originally Posted by Capn Pete
About what?! The speedometer lag part? Sure, they lag, I think most people realize that . The cable speedometer part? Nope!
I never claimed I had a cable speedometer. I claimed that the speedo lagged and when sprinting to 60mph when it registers 60 on the speedo, it isn't there yet.

Last edited by christianjax; Mar 2, 2009 at 11:28 AM.

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:49 AM.