2010 - 2015 Camaro Interior, Exterior, Paint & Body, Electronics/Car Audio 2010 - 2011 - 2012 - 2013 - 2014 - 2015 Camaro discussion for body kits, paint and stripe care, seats, dash, gauges, car audio, etc.

RS Taillight Difference Pics Inside

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Oct 20, 2008 | 08:33 AM
  #1  
Gomerr's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 8
RS Taillight Difference Pics Inside

This is just an informational post due to the great ways you can see the difference.




The picture above is without the RS package, as you can see, inside the actual taillight itself the bottom "U" shape is the red color.




This last picture though shows a much darker lip on the "U" shape in the taillight, almost a dark maroon.

Hope this helps

PS: Credit to Dragoneye from Camaro5
Old Oct 20, 2008 | 10:20 AM
  #2  
30AnniversaryZ28's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 284
From: Charleston, SC
I like the RS much better. Too bad neither has the amber turn signal like a few of the pictures
Old Oct 20, 2008 | 10:33 AM
  #3  
shock6906's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 3,577
From: Sandy VJJville
I wouldn't exactly trust those pictures to be perfect. If the camera was on automatic, it could have changed exposure or white balance and give different looking pictures, when in reality, the taillights could look the same. And to me, the red in the chrome trim ring just looks like a reflection of the lens in the chrome. The pictures are taken from slightly different elevations, so the reflections could have easily played out differently.
Old Oct 20, 2008 | 01:55 PM
  #4  
ChevEE's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 87
I thought the silver trim was only on RS, but it is in both pictures.
Old Oct 20, 2008 | 02:10 PM
  #5  
seawolf06's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 3,034
From: Raleigh, NC
So what's the difference exactly?
Old Oct 20, 2008 | 05:39 PM
  #6  
Gomerr's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 8
The differences were mentioned in the first post. the bottom U shape is a darker color red then the other parts of the light.

personally the pics to me show it very clearly, as well as browsing through the other countless pictures for that particular event.

The yellow camaro is a standard LT/RS but as you can see the grey is only an SS

and to 30thanniversaryz28, the amber taillights are for Australian drivers only ;(

Last edited by Gomerr; Oct 21, 2008 at 08:16 AM. Reason: edited grey's model type
Old Oct 20, 2008 | 06:37 PM
  #7  
91BigRedz28's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 116
From: Worcester, MA
I will agree that the camera may be playing *some* tricks on us, but- if anything the RS lamps would probably end up showing up lighter than in real life. The outer part of the RS lamps definitely look darker. I'm not so sure that's a major selling point- I'd have to see them with the lights on, I think that's when you (Mustang owners) would see the difference. LOL.
Isn't the silver is just an SS? the "SS" badge would be red if it had the RS package, unless I missed something...
Old Oct 20, 2008 | 10:44 PM
  #8  
seawolf06's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 3,034
From: Raleigh, NC
Originally Posted by Gomerr
The yellow camaro is a standard LT/RS but as you can see the grey is a SS/RS.
Well that explains it, they both have the RS package and the same tailights! lol

To me the RS package is retarded and I'd just upgrade the HID, nothing else. I mean, darker tailights? Seriously?
Old Oct 20, 2008 | 11:53 PM
  #9  
MetalDragon's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 524
From: Houston Area
Originally Posted by Gomerr
The differences were mentioned in the first post. the bottom U shape is a darker color red then the other parts of the light.

The yellow camaro is a standard LT/RS but as you can see the grey is a SS/RS.
I've heard someone say the difference is in the chrome behind the lenses. "Black" chrome on the RS and reg. chrome on the other models. That looks to be the case.

And the SS is standard..no RS package.
Old Oct 21, 2008 | 12:47 AM
  #10  
BitchinCamaro's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 267
From: Woburn, MA
Originally Posted by 91BigRedz28
I will agree that the camera may be playing *some* tricks on us
Nope... I was at the Indy event, these pics are just what they look like in real life. Note though, these are still production-intent pieces, so the final look could be slightly different.
Old Oct 21, 2008 | 08:17 AM
  #11  
Gomerr's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 8
correction made, i was unsure why i had ss/rs, but it was when i was in another mindstate.

regardless, like bitchin mentioned these are still pre-pub and alot may change.

the darker taillight lenses is definitly not worth the RS package, however the slight variances are nice...specially stock Halos
Old Oct 21, 2008 | 09:46 PM
  #12  
DAKMOR's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 1,406
From: Philaduhphia
and they were saying we cant have blue because of too many different colored parts!!

****ing bull****.
Old Oct 26, 2008 | 04:00 PM
  #13  
cameroin's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 2
I can see the difference. Thanks for posting them.

Question: Are the tail lights LED's?
Old Oct 27, 2008 | 10:43 AM
  #14  
72 Z27's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 149
From: St. Louis, MO
Next question, is there any pics with both of them lit up as running lights?
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
cmsmith
2010 - 2015 Camaro News, Sightings, Pictures, and Multimedia
0
Mar 16, 2015 02:34 PM
karguy16
Parts For Sale
0
Mar 6, 2015 01:31 AM
rjc1629
Parts For Sale
1
Jan 27, 2015 10:46 AM
Queens94z28
Parts For Sale
3
Dec 20, 2014 09:11 PM
omarECD
Site Help and Suggestions
1
Aug 19, 2002 07:28 AM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:07 PM.