

|
02-12-2008, 03:47 PM
|
#1
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Confederate States of America
Posts: 405
|
Turbo 6 cylinder option?
With the rumors about the 3.5 twin turbo going into the new Mustang, what do you guys think about a Turbo 6 in the Camaro? I've been hoping for the option since 1987 when I first experienced a stock Grand National that produced more torque than the L-98 in the Vette. I personally would prefer a turbo 6(with strong internals) over a NA V8. If they could get AFM to work on it that would be even better. Anybody else a turbo fan or strictly V8's only? Let me edit, I want a turbo 6 that can be cheaply modified and won't grenade. If it's made of glass then give me the V8.
__________________
Forget gold, the next currency will be lead!
|
|
|
02-12-2008, 05:03 PM
|
#2
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: united states
Posts: 376
|
Personally i would consider a turbo 6 .
__________________
Future 2010 Camaro Owner
Old Rides:
Silver 1998 Firebird Formula WS6 M6 Sold
Silver 2000 Firebird V6 14.76 @ 91.98 Sold
|
|
|
02-14-2008, 06:14 AM
|
#3
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Mi
Posts: 718
|
I'd buy one in a heartbeat. (no pun intended)
__________________
Current Ride's
92 Z28 1LE Z03 LC2
98 Z28 Bone Stock
89 TTA #1025
Past Rides
89 TTA #1415
89 TTA #891 RIP
81 TTA Nascar
91 TA Vert T5 WS6 G92 LB9
|
|
|
02-14-2008, 11:02 AM
|
#4
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Confederate States of America
Posts: 405
|
I like the turbo option mainly for the weight savings(unless it's iron blocked) and the easy modibility of turbo's. they're free horsepower waiting to be uncorked.
__________________
Forget gold, the next currency will be lead!
|
|
|
02-14-2008, 11:24 AM
|
#5
|
|
Super Moderator
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Okemos, MI
Posts: 7,542
|
I think it's a great idea. I'd consider it if it were in the ~350hp range.
__________________
2002 NBM Camaro Z28 M6 - best ET 13.21, best MPH 108.9, best 60' 2.14 - 325hp/343tq - Lid, Corsa, SixSpeedsInc T56, Pro 5.0 w/ short stick, 17x9 wheels
1987 Buick Grand National - best ET 13.66, best MPH 101.5, best 60' 2.08 - 253hp/334tq - 93 chip, RJC, meth, Hooker catback, 160 t-stat, shift kit, no-hop bars
|
|
|
02-14-2008, 12:31 PM
|
#6
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Mi
Posts: 718
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by JakeRobb
I think it's a great idea. I'd consider it if it were in the ~350hp range.
|
I can't imagine it wouldn't, those 20+ year old SFI Buick V6's have been past that for... what 20 years
__________________
Current Ride's
92 Z28 1LE Z03 LC2
98 Z28 Bone Stock
89 TTA #1025
Past Rides
89 TTA #1415
89 TTA #891 RIP
81 TTA Nascar
91 TA Vert T5 WS6 G92 LB9
|
|
|
02-14-2008, 01:56 PM
|
#7
|
|
Super Moderator
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Okemos, MI
Posts: 7,542
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by metal
I can't imagine it wouldn't, those 20+ year old SFI Buick V6's have been past that for... what 20 years 
|
Um, no, they haven't.
My lightly-modded GN makes about 260rwhp. It's the torque that makes it special.
If I bought a Camaro with a turbo V6, I would want it to make at least 350hp and 350lb-ft.
__________________
2002 NBM Camaro Z28 M6 - best ET 13.21, best MPH 108.9, best 60' 2.14 - 325hp/343tq - Lid, Corsa, SixSpeedsInc T56, Pro 5.0 w/ short stick, 17x9 wheels
1987 Buick Grand National - best ET 13.66, best MPH 101.5, best 60' 2.08 - 253hp/334tq - 93 chip, RJC, meth, Hooker catback, 160 t-stat, shift kit, no-hop bars
|
|
|
02-14-2008, 02:16 PM
|
#8
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Mi
Posts: 718
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by JakeRobb
Um, no, they haven't.
My lightly-modded GN makes about 260rwhp. It's the torque that makes it special.
If I bought a Camaro with a turbo V6, I would want it to make at least 350hp and 350lb-ft.
|
Hi
I didn't mean stock 
Back at the powertour in 01 my bolt on 89 Turbo T/A Dyno'd 349.8 RWHP and 416 torque on a stock turbo.
I haven't dynoed my Turbo Z or my current Turbo T/A but they have many many more mods then I had back then.
I don't think it would be too hard for a Turbo 6 2010 Camaro to be 350RWHP from the factory
__________________
Current Ride's
92 Z28 1LE Z03 LC2
98 Z28 Bone Stock
89 TTA #1025
Past Rides
89 TTA #1415
89 TTA #891 RIP
81 TTA Nascar
91 TA Vert T5 WS6 G92 LB9
|
|
|
02-14-2008, 02:19 PM
|
#9
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2003
Posts: 549
|
I would definetely consider a turbo 6 based on price.
If Ford comes out (as the rumors say) with a Twin turbo 6 making 415-425 hp and as much torque as the GT, for the same price as the GT, it will be on my list.
If GM does the same, it too will be on my list. As long as I can special order it without other options and an Manual Trans, it's all good.
|
|
|
02-14-2008, 02:40 PM
|
#10
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Jacksonville Florida
Posts: 875
|
having owned and LOVED a Grand National (still my favorite car I ever owned) I would jump at the chance to own a new V6 Turbo if it dominated like the GN's did back in thier day.
__________________
Live Fast, Die Young, & Leave a Pretty Corpse.
'06 Daytona/Charger Torred #724 of 2000
'99 Trans Am (black)
08 Suzuki Hayabusa (Orange/black)
 CHRISTIANJAX
|
|
|
02-14-2008, 02:45 PM
|
#11
|
|
Super Moderator
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Okemos, MI
Posts: 7,542
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by metal
Back at the powertour in 01 my bolt on 89 Turbo T/A Dyno'd 349.8 RWHP and 416 torque on a stock turbo.
|
What mods did you have to make those numbers? My GN isn't stock, but it doesn't make anywhere near that much power.
__________________
2002 NBM Camaro Z28 M6 - best ET 13.21, best MPH 108.9, best 60' 2.14 - 325hp/343tq - Lid, Corsa, SixSpeedsInc T56, Pro 5.0 w/ short stick, 17x9 wheels
1987 Buick Grand National - best ET 13.66, best MPH 101.5, best 60' 2.08 - 253hp/334tq - 93 chip, RJC, meth, Hooker catback, 160 t-stat, shift kit, no-hop bars
|
|
|
02-14-2008, 04:36 PM
|
#12
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Confederate States of America
Posts: 405
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by 5thGen
I would definetely consider a turbo 6 based on price.
If Ford comes out (as the rumors say) with a Twin turbo 6 making 415-425 hp and as much torque as the GT, for the same price as the GT, it will be on my list.
If GM does the same, it too will be on my list. As long as I can special order it without other options and an Manual Trans, it's all good.
|
I'm exactly like you, whichever is the better bang for the buck, durable, and cheap to mod will be in my garage. I was glad to see Ford coming to it's senses, the only problem is a lot of the purists have a hard time considering anything other than a V8. I'll take a quick revving DOHC Turbo 6 anyday!
__________________
Forget gold, the next currency will be lead!
|
|
|
02-14-2008, 11:01 PM
|
#13
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Mi
Posts: 718
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by JakeRobb
What mods did you have to make those numbers? My GN isn't stock, but it doesn't make anywhere near that much power.
|
K&N, chip, 42lbs injectors, fuel pump, hotwire kit, adjustable FP regulator, THDP (with the cutout open) converter.
Thats about it.
I just dug up a picture of the dyno chart it was 349.8 and 412 ft lbs torque.
__________________
Current Ride's
92 Z28 1LE Z03 LC2
98 Z28 Bone Stock
89 TTA #1025
Past Rides
89 TTA #1415
89 TTA #891 RIP
81 TTA Nascar
91 TA Vert T5 WS6 G92 LB9
|
|
|
02-14-2008, 11:48 PM
|
#14
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Los Angeles, Ca
Posts: 239
|
I would like anything that would take out those Stangs. I don't know if i can afford those?
|
|
|
02-15-2008, 09:37 AM
|
#15
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Earleville, MD
Posts: 1,204
|
If the V8 and turbo 6 had the same performance/cost numbers, I would pick the turbo 6.
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:35 PM.
|