|
04-09-2004, 10:25 PM
|
#1
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: atlanta, ga
Posts: 228
|
finally got my 315's
after searching and searching i finally found a deal on some 17x11 torq thrust IIs, and 315/35/17 goodyear gsc's, check it out.
http://images.cardomain.com/member_i...74_96_full.jpg
__________________
1996 Trans Am WS6 #34
www.cardomain.com/id/gunter96ws6
|
|
|
|
04-09-2004, 11:01 PM
|
#2
|
|
Registered User
Premium Member
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Glendale, Ca
Posts: 3,649
|
no me gusta 
__________________
-Zack-
1996 Pontiac Trans Am-A4--3.23--OBDI--Ram Air--Edelbrock Headers--Borla Exhaust--Hotchkis STB/Sway Bars/PHB/LCA--18x9.5/18x11 ACE Slick--275/35/18--315/30/18 NT01
2003.5 MAZDASPEED Protegé-#2516 of 3850-Coilovers--GTSpec Braces--Intake--FMIC--Thermal R&D exhaust--Direzza Star Specs
|
|
|
|
|
04-09-2004, 11:03 PM
|
#3
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Chilliwack, BC, Canada
Posts: 4,661
|
Wow man.........looks like they stick out quite a bit......
Very tough looking from the back - it's got that Flintstones car kinda look...... 
__________________
1997 Red Zed M6
K&N Intake, Dynomax Exhaust, MSD6A Ignition and B&M Ripper
|
|
|
|
|
04-10-2004, 12:09 AM
|
#4
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Chicago
Posts: 1,094
|
Ive seen a lot of F bodies with 315s and they look awesome. But there is something definetly not right about yours. They seem to stick out way to much.
|
|
|
|
|
04-10-2004, 12:18 AM
|
#5
|
|
Registered User
Premium Member
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Macomb Twp, MI
Posts: 1,933
|
Yeah, I have to agree, I mean I like the fatties but the backspacing seems to be a lil off. But hey, if you like 'em, they're GREAT! Everyone's got an opinion, if you like 'em that's the only opinion that matters right? All in all tho, thumbs up to 315's on an f-body. When I actually get the money and some other projects done, that's my next step is to get some nice tires, and I'm definitely gettin 315s in the back! 
|
|
|
|
|
04-10-2004, 02:03 AM
|
#6
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Jamestown, NY J&P MUscLE
Posts: 1,346
|
I likem 
-john
__________________
'94 Z28 Clone
GEN1-468 BBC/M6/-FULL CAGE-BACK HALFED-4 LINKED--Dana 60
Proud Member of FLFBofWNY  
"The Key to going Fast is to learn from those who are going the Fastest."-Jason Short 03'
|
|
|
|
|
04-10-2004, 03:17 AM
|
#7
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2002
Posts: 1,793
|
Quote:
Originally posted by Black01_Z
They seem to stick out way to much.
|
Yes they do. They look a bit...odd...
__________________
‹^›  ‹^› ™
Courtesy of 5 and a game misconduct
|
|
|
|
|
04-10-2004, 03:42 AM
|
#8
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Port Coquitlam, B.C.
Posts: 2,111
|
I like them but an improvement would be to flare out the rear quarters.
__________________
C6, corsa sport exhaust, vararam intake and throttlebody spacer, airbrushed frc's and hoodliner, Alpine dvd, JL Audio twin W7 subs, 1000/1 and 450/4 amps, XR replacements, etched alt/fuse and battery covers, passport 8500
|
|
|
|
|
04-10-2004, 07:02 AM
|
#9
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Frisco TEXAS
Posts: 1,709
|
The backspacing is way off on those. Are those the 50mm or 56mm backspacing?
I went with the 36.5mm backspacing and my 315s are TUCKED up under the rear. I didn't even have to use the BFH mod. They fit perfectly. I will try and get some pics up tommorow.
|
|
|
|
|
04-10-2004, 07:04 AM
|
#10
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Frisco TEXAS
Posts: 1,709
|
Wait, I take that back. NOw that I got a better look at your picture, they look right. You see up until the first water tread line on my 315s.
My bad, 6:00a.m. in the morning and going on 10 hours at work can do that kindd of stuff to you.
|
|
|
|
|
04-10-2004, 10:12 AM
|
#11
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: atlanta, ga
Posts: 228
|
same offset as everyone else with an fbod and 315s in the rear, its just the angle, look at these.
this one you can tell it dosnt even stick out:
http://images.cardomain.com/member_i...74_99_full.jpg
__________________
1996 Trans Am WS6 #34
www.cardomain.com/id/gunter96ws6
|
|
|
|
|
04-10-2004, 10:31 AM
|
#12
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: atlanta, ga
Posts: 228
|
__________________
1996 Trans Am WS6 #34
www.cardomain.com/id/gunter96ws6
Last edited by gunter96ws6; 04-10-2004 at 12:03 PM.
|
|
|
|
|
04-10-2004, 01:27 PM
|
#13
|
|
Registered User
Premium Member
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Peachtree City, GA
Posts: 5,132
|
__________________
700+rwhp 15+psi 95' Z28 M6
ATI D1 * AFR 227s * Big Bump Stick
Moser 12-bolt (3.73) * McLeod Street Twin
Baer Track Kit * Fikse FM/5 * GMMG
|
|
|
|
|
04-10-2004, 01:56 PM
|
#14
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: MN,USA
Posts: 3,774
|
I don't see anything wrong with the backspacing. They don't stick out any further than the others. You can't really tell how far they stick out unless you get a view from the top.
|
|
|
|
|
04-10-2004, 03:14 PM
|
#15
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Mississauga, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 507
|
I think it looks fine. just different angles of pictures. Also his WS6 sits a bit higher so the wheels may appear to stick out more
|
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
 Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:50 AM.
|
