

|
Welcome to CamaroZ28.Com, the ultimate Source for Camaro enthusiasts! Here you can join nearly 80,000 enthusiasts from around the world discussing all things related to Camaros and more. You are currently viewing as a guest which gives you limited access to view discussions
To gain full access to our forums you must register for a free account. As a registered member you will be able to:
- Participate in over 40 different forums and search/browse from over 4 million posts.
- Communicate privately with other enthusiasts from around the world (PM).
- Post photos, respond to polls and access other special features
- Gain access to our free marketplace to buy, sell and trade cars, parts and more.
All this and much more is available to you absolutely free when you register for an account, so join our community today today!
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact support. |
06-09-2002, 03:32 PM
|
#1
|
|
New Member
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Rochester, NY
Posts: 5
|
Hollow or Solid Sway Bars?
I have a 2001 Z28 that I want to set up for roadracing. I was wondering what would be better, solid or hollow sway bars? and should I keep the stock rear or buy a 21mm?
|
|
|
06-10-2002, 01:06 AM
|
#2
|
|
Junior Member
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: burleson, TX
Posts: 34
|
hollow sway bars have almost the exact same anti-sway abilities as a solid bar with an identical diamter...
anti-sway bars are for tuning the suspension... 21MM rear bar might be great for one track, and a 19MM bar might be better for a different track
[This message has been edited by prockbp (edited June 10, 2002).]
|
|
|
06-10-2002, 09:11 PM
|
#3
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 1998
Location: US 1 Mile Marker 52 in the Florida Keys
Posts: 8,524
|
i've heard that the difference between solid and hollow is that solid equals about 2 more mm dia. in hollow...in ohter words...
32mm hollow equates to 30 solid...
my BMR 32/21mm solids are great...love them.
------------------
ARREST-ME RED 96 Z-28, M6...stock for now...but i've only had it three days...1st mod on day 4! TB airfoil...NOW...G2 CAI( modified), K&N, MagnaFlow w/ cutout( closed of course), maf ends, ?cags?, UD pulley, TB bypass, 160stat, SLP fan switch, SLP air temp module, Hypertech PTM, MSD 6A, Hurst(SS donation) with a Lou's SStick and Proform Shiftlight, BMR lca, phb and stb, 32/21mm sway bars w/ poly bushings and endlinks, ES poly TA mount, air silencer???
Waiting to go on: 1LE springs, SLP afpr
For Sale: stock exhaust+ sq. tips, 30/19mm sway bars w/ stock bushings
__________________
ARREST-ME RED 99 Z-28, M6 - TSP Torquer V1 (233/233 .589" 112*), HS rockers, Flowtech LTs, 3" TDs, magnaflow 4x9s, FAST 90/90 ported, Mez EWP, 160 stat, SSRA, TSP lid, GMS maf ends, ASP pulley, Hurst w/LSS, Spec4, Fidanza FW, SS brake lines, BMR lca w/ brackets, phb, stb, 32/21mm swaybars, sfc, ZR1s
408.6 hp, 379.5 torque
|
|
|
06-11-2002, 12:46 AM
|
#4
|
|
Member
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Portland, OR USA
Posts: 183
|
I don't know but the metal it's made from would certainly have some significant effect too. A softer metal on a solid bar may not be as good as a stiffer metal. Anyone know as I am curious also.
------------------
95 Z28, SLP Y pipe, Flowmaster muffler, SFC, STB, KYB shocks, Moroso CAI, 1LE front anti roll bar, Hurst shifter, TBB, LT4 KM, LG Motorsports pedals
__________________
95 Z28, SLP Y pipe, Flowmaster muffler, SFC, STB, KYB shocks, Moroso CAI, 1LE front anti roll bar w/poly bushings, Hurst shifter, TBB, LT4 KM, LG Motorsports pedals, high flow Cat.
|
|
|
06-12-2002, 01:51 PM
|
#5
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Delaware Twp, NJ
Posts: 531
|
Quote:
<font face="Verdana, Arial" size="2">Originally posted by warner:
I don't know but the metal it's made from would certainly have some significant effect too. A softer metal on a solid bar may not be as good as a stiffer metal. Anyone know as I am curious also.
</font>
|
There's little difference in the inherent stiffness properties among the various grades of steel. The modulus of elasticity generally falls within about a 10% range (26E6 psi - 30E6 psi). And I'm not aware of any bars made from aluminum (10E6 psi)
[Edit, see the following post for the correct formula. NoveScotiaRS caught me with my brain in neutral]
Since it's a 4th power ratio, small changes in the diameter ratio show up as much larger changes in the stiffness ratio, so measure carefully.
Norm
------------------
1979 Malibu, 355, 5 speed, cornering tweaks, some other stuff
2001 20th Anniversary Maxima, 5 speed
[This message has been edited by Norm Peterson (edited June 17, 2002).]
__________________
'08 Mustang GT, 5-speed manual, didn't stay F-Stock legal for long . . .
'79 Malibu, 5-speed manual, weenie CP car
'95 626, 5-speed manual, now in EP
'01 Maxima manual, 5-speed
|
|
|
06-12-2002, 06:59 PM
|
#6
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada
Posts: 165
|
You are one the right track, but have made an error. The formula for torsional stiffness of a torsion bar is:
K = JG/L where:
K is the stiffness of the bar,
J is polar moment of the cross section of the bar
G is the shear modulus of the matrial, and
L is the length of the bar.
Given that all sway bars for the 4th gen camaro are the same length, the arms of the sway bars are the same length, and that steel is steel, then comparing stiffness is a matter of comparing J.
for a solid bar: J = pi * OD^4 / 32
for a hollow bar: J = pi * (OD^4 - ID^4) / 32
the formula for compairing bars is:
J1/J2 or
(OD1^4 - ID1^4)/(OD2^4 - ID2^4)
and ID = 0 for a solid bar.
(Not OD^4/ID^4)
So a solid 19mm bar compaired to a 21mm-10mm hollow bar is 19^4 /(21^4 - 10^4) which works out to 0.70 or 70%. A 19mm solid bar has 70% of ths stiffness of a 21mm bar with a 10mm hole in it.
Likewise a 21mm bar with a 15.9mm hole through it is the same stiffness as a 19mm solid bar.
<edit>
The advantage of a hollow bar is that a hollow bar is lighter than the same stiffness solid bar. Looking at the 19mm vs the 21mm-15.9mm above:
the hollow bar weighs: L*pi*(21^2-15.9^2)*density/4
the solid bar weighs: L*pi*(19^2)*density/4
So compairing the mass of these two:
(21^2-15.9^2)/(19^2) = 0.52 or 52%
The hollow bar is near halve the weight of the solid bar and is as stiff!!!
<end edit>
Regards,
Derek
------------------
Bright Red 97RS
Mods:
1LE AL Driveshaft
1/4 time: who knows
derekcole.cz28.com
camaroz28.cardomain.com/id/novascotiars
[This message has been edited by NovaScotiaRS (edited June 12, 2002).]
|
|
|
06-14-2002, 12:02 PM
|
#7
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 1999
Location: Texas
Posts: 1,204
|
Ouch ... that hurt my brain.
So, which is better ...
35mm (ST) solid or 32mm (1LE) hollow?
|
|
|
06-14-2002, 01:03 PM
|
#8
|
|
Junior Member
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Hartland, MI
Posts: 12
|
Go for the 35mm ST bar, without running the numbers I can subjectively say that your car will be noticeably stiffer in roll with the 35mm solid. Not to mention Strano seems to like them. Once the front bar is out of the way its a matter of balancing it out at the rear.
__________________
94' Z28
98' Grand Prix GT
83' Impala (daily driver)
E30 BMW? (still looking)
|
|
|
06-14-2002, 01:35 PM
|
#9
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 1999
Location: Texas
Posts: 1,204
|
I've got the 35 ST on the front now and a 21mm 1LE on the rear.
I picked up a significant push ...
Maybe the 25 ST rear bar?
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:17 PM.
|