RSKrause: please advise on compression ratio: 8.3 or 9.5
RSKrause: please advise on compression ratio: 8.3 or 9.5
I am building a stroker for supercharged use. Here is the run-down:
- 385 cid, 5.7 rod LT1
- AFR 210's flowed 280 in 218 ex at Thunder Racing
- Comp custom grind 276/286 @ .006, 224/230 @ .050, .567"/.565", 114 LSA, 0 deg adv.
- LT-4 intake port matched
- ASM 1 3/4" headers
- T-trim with 6.66 / 2.75 pullies (12 - 14 psi boost)
- Aftercooler
- TH-350 with '0' pump Vigilante (3300 actual stall) and 3.42's
With my 68 cc chamber heads and SRP pistons, I am given a choice between 16 and 31 cc dishes. One compression ratio is 8.3 and the other is 9.5. I'd really like something in the middle, but SRP doesn't make pistons with a 25 cc dish.
It is not a daily driver, but it is 70% street, 30% track use. I run 93 octane in it and I'm in BR, LA, where summer days get to 95+ degrees and the altitude is low.
Which compression ration should I choose?
Thanks,
Mike
- 385 cid, 5.7 rod LT1
- AFR 210's flowed 280 in 218 ex at Thunder Racing
- Comp custom grind 276/286 @ .006, 224/230 @ .050, .567"/.565", 114 LSA, 0 deg adv.
- LT-4 intake port matched
- ASM 1 3/4" headers
- T-trim with 6.66 / 2.75 pullies (12 - 14 psi boost)
- Aftercooler
- TH-350 with '0' pump Vigilante (3300 actual stall) and 3.42's
With my 68 cc chamber heads and SRP pistons, I am given a choice between 16 and 31 cc dishes. One compression ratio is 8.3 and the other is 9.5. I'd really like something in the middle, but SRP doesn't make pistons with a 25 cc dish.
It is not a daily driver, but it is 70% street, 30% track use. I run 93 octane in it and I'm in BR, LA, where summer days get to 95+ degrees and the altitude is low.
Which compression ration should I choose?
Thanks,
Mike
I know im not even close to Rich but either one will work fine. I much rather have a little lower than higher. It decreases detonation factor a lot. Power loss will be little to none on a high boost motor. 9.5 to 1 is the highest i would go. Why not just spend the extra bucks and get the desired compression you want. One other thing to consider is the fuel system driving that monster.
Bill
Bill
Last edited by 94SLUG; May 28, 2003 at 08:26 PM.
Re: RSKrause: please advise on compression ratio: 8.3 or 9.5
Originally posted by engineermike
I am building a stroker for supercharged use. Here is the run-down:
- 385 cid, 5.7 rod LT1
- AFR 210's flowed 280 in 218 ex at Thunder Racing
- Comp custom grind 276/286 @ .006, 224/230 @ .050, .567"/.565", 114 LSA, 0 deg adv.
- LT-4 intake port matched
- ASM 1 3/4" headers
- T-trim with 6.66 / 2.75 pullies (12 - 14 psi boost)
- Aftercooler
- TH-350 with '0' pump Vigilante (3300 actual stall) and 3.42's
With my 68 cc chamber heads and SRP pistons, I am given a choice between 16 and 31 cc dishes. One compression ratio is 8.3 and the other is 9.5. I'd really like something in the middle, but SRP doesn't make pistons with a 25 cc dish.
It is not a daily driver, but it is 70% street, 30% track use. I run 93 octane in it and I'm in BR, LA, where summer days get to 95+ degrees and the altitude is low.
Which compression ration should I choose?
Thanks,
Mike
I am building a stroker for supercharged use. Here is the run-down:
- 385 cid, 5.7 rod LT1
- AFR 210's flowed 280 in 218 ex at Thunder Racing
- Comp custom grind 276/286 @ .006, 224/230 @ .050, .567"/.565", 114 LSA, 0 deg adv.
- LT-4 intake port matched
- ASM 1 3/4" headers
- T-trim with 6.66 / 2.75 pullies (12 - 14 psi boost)
- Aftercooler
- TH-350 with '0' pump Vigilante (3300 actual stall) and 3.42's
With my 68 cc chamber heads and SRP pistons, I am given a choice between 16 and 31 cc dishes. One compression ratio is 8.3 and the other is 9.5. I'd really like something in the middle, but SRP doesn't make pistons with a 25 cc dish.
It is not a daily driver, but it is 70% street, 30% track use. I run 93 octane in it and I'm in BR, LA, where summer days get to 95+ degrees and the altitude is low.
Which compression ration should I choose?
Thanks,
Mike
An NA setup fills the cylinder passively and the mass of the air charge is essentially the same no matter the CR. There is less power because the combustion process is less efficient at the lower CR. But with a blower and the resultant positive manfild pressure, it's a different ballgame.
Your combo should make good power, in excess of 650rwhp if everything is right. Tuning a combo like your is vital however. I would like to see a little more exhaust duration on the cam.
Good luck.
Rich Krause
OK, Rich, I've picked out some new lobes from Comp:
Intake: 276 adv, 224 @ .050, 152 @ .200, .567"
Exhaust: 288 adv, 236 @ .050, 162 @ .200, .585"
My question now is lobe centers. I had originally planned to use 114 lobe centers for intake and exhaust (114 LSA, 0 deg adv.).
What do you think?
Thanks,
Mike
Intake: 276 adv, 224 @ .050, 152 @ .200, .567"
Exhaust: 288 adv, 236 @ .050, 162 @ .200, .585"
My question now is lobe centers. I had originally planned to use 114 lobe centers for intake and exhaust (114 LSA, 0 deg adv.).
What do you think?
Thanks,
Mike
Originally posted by engineermike
OK, Rich, I've picked out some new lobes from Comp:
Intake: 276 adv, 224 @ .050, 152 @ .200, .567"
Exhaust: 288 adv, 236 @ .050, 162 @ .200, .585"
My question now is lobe centers. I had originally planned to use 114 lobe centers for intake and exhaust (114 LSA, 0 deg adv.).
What do you think?
Thanks,
Mike
OK, Rich, I've picked out some new lobes from Comp:
Intake: 276 adv, 224 @ .050, 152 @ .200, .567"
Exhaust: 288 adv, 236 @ .050, 162 @ .200, .585"
My question now is lobe centers. I had originally planned to use 114 lobe centers for intake and exhaust (114 LSA, 0 deg adv.).
What do you think?
Thanks,
Mike
Rich
Listen to Rich, BUT if you want to go for a 9:1 compression ratio then take a look at Probe pistons. They have one for a 383 stroker with a dish that is 20.4cc's. Wiht your heads and the usual Felpro gaskets that would come out to be 9.09:1. And if you really want a 25cc dish they will custom make a set for about $775. I was thinking about going that way but instead I am going to use the 31cc SRPs and get my head milled down to about 59cc's.
In the past, I've used TRW's, Wiseco's, and SRP's. I paid $600 for the Wiseco's and they knocked like a diesel and used a quart of oil every 500 miles. But, I was very happy with the SRP's. I ran .001 extra clearance on the bore and set the ring gap at .024 - .026, but oil consumption was less than one quart every 3000 miles and they were very quiet.
I'm not saying that the Probe's are bad, but I don't have any experience with them. I don't want to build another motor like the Wiseco motor.
The SRP's, however, have proven themselves so I wanted to stick with them.
Mike
I'm not saying that the Probe's are bad, but I don't have any experience with them. I don't want to build another motor like the Wiseco motor.
The SRP's, however, have proven themselves so I wanted to stick with them.
Mike
Originally posted by engineermike
In the past, I've used TRW's, Wiseco's, and SRP's. I paid $600 for the Wiseco's and they knocked like a diesel and used a quart of oil every 500 miles. But, I was very happy with the SRP's. I ran .001 extra clearance on the bore and set the ring gap at .024 - .026, but oil consumption was less than one quart every 3000 miles and they were very quiet.
I'm not saying that the Probe's are bad, but I don't have any experience with them. I don't want to build another motor like the Wiseco motor.
The SRP's, however, have proven themselves so I wanted to stick with them.
Mike
In the past, I've used TRW's, Wiseco's, and SRP's. I paid $600 for the Wiseco's and they knocked like a diesel and used a quart of oil every 500 miles. But, I was very happy with the SRP's. I ran .001 extra clearance on the bore and set the ring gap at .024 - .026, but oil consumption was less than one quart every 3000 miles and they were very quiet.
I'm not saying that the Probe's are bad, but I don't have any experience with them. I don't want to build another motor like the Wiseco motor.
The SRP's, however, have proven themselves so I wanted to stick with them.
Mike

the pistons caused the motor to knock
or was it the incorrect compression ratio with those pistons? my weiscos dont knock at all... or burn oil
the pistons caused the motor to knock
Originally posted by engineermike
In the past, I've used TRW's, Wiseco's, and SRP's. I paid $600 for the Wiseco's and they knocked like a diesel and used a quart of oil every 500 miles. But, I was very happy with the SRP's. I ran .001 extra clearance on the bore and set the ring gap at .024 - .026, but oil consumption was less than one quart every 3000 miles and they were very quiet.
I'm not saying that the Probe's are bad, but I don't have any experience with them. I don't want to build another motor like the Wiseco motor.
The SRP's, however, have proven themselves so I wanted to stick with them.
Mike
In the past, I've used TRW's, Wiseco's, and SRP's. I paid $600 for the Wiseco's and they knocked like a diesel and used a quart of oil every 500 miles. But, I was very happy with the SRP's. I ran .001 extra clearance on the bore and set the ring gap at .024 - .026, but oil consumption was less than one quart every 3000 miles and they were very quiet.
I'm not saying that the Probe's are bad, but I don't have any experience with them. I don't want to build another motor like the Wiseco motor.
The SRP's, however, have proven themselves so I wanted to stick with them.
Mike
Bill
Last edited by 94SLUG; Jun 11, 2003 at 09:46 PM.
I file-fit the rings myself to .024 - .026", just like the SRP's.
The wrist pins are all OK. No excess clearance.
I tend to believe that I got a bad set of pistons that are either too small or improperly shaped.
Mike
The wrist pins are all OK. No excess clearance.
I tend to believe that I got a bad set of pistons that are either too small or improperly shaped.
Mike


