Automotive News / Industry / Future Vehicle Discussion Automotive news and discussion about upcoming vehicles

Good News on the GM Front...

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Dec 24, 2008 | 04:10 PM
  #1  
MarcR94v6's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 1,960
From: San Diego, CA
Good News on the GM Front...

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20081224/...bi_ge/fed_gmac
Old Dec 24, 2008 | 07:05 PM
  #2  
DvBoard's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 940
From: Southern Indiana
Now lets hope this means they allow more people to get loans, like it should...
Old Dec 24, 2008 | 08:00 PM
  #3  
guionM's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 13,713
From: The Golden State
To be honest, I believe bailout money immediately going to GMAC and Chrysler Financial as long as the money went to auto loans and not anything else would have been enough for Chrysler to hold on, and would have been a huge help for GM.

Federal backed loans alone don't do much unless you find a way to get people who want new vehicles, and have the means to make the payments can actually get loans to make the purchases. 75% of Chrysler's financing depends on Chrysler Financial, and dealers report continuing showroom traffic.

The press also hasn't been putting Chrysler's potential for bankruptcy in the spotlight as it has GMs, and you can see the results in how much % GM's sales have plunged over Chrysler's.
Old Dec 25, 2008 | 05:23 AM
  #4  
SSbaby's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 3,123
From: Melbourne, Australia
All I see is Cerberus getting more govt money. Why are Cerberus getting financial assistance when they are making billion$ each year in profits?
Old Dec 26, 2008 | 08:50 AM
  #5  
slt's Avatar
slt
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 1,024
how come GM has to reduce their ownership to less than 10% while Ceberus gets to hold on to 33%?
Old Dec 26, 2008 | 09:35 AM
  #6  
Darth Xed's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 8,504
From: Ohio
Friend at a dealership says they still have a decent amount of traffic, just can't get loans for 80% of the people who want to buy...
Old Dec 26, 2008 | 09:47 AM
  #7  
Z284ever's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 16,176
From: Chicagoland IL
Some things to note...

This plan has GM committed to retaining less that 10% of GMAC. Cerberus must give up some shares as well. This story says 33%, another I've read says 14%.
Old Dec 26, 2008 | 02:11 PM
  #8  
DvBoard's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 940
From: Southern Indiana
Originally Posted by Z284ever
Some things to note...

This plan has GM committed to retaining less that 10% of GMAC. Cerberus must give up some shares as well. This story says 33%, another I've read says 14%.
As long as GM customers can get loans for GM cars, it doesn't matter who owns it IMO.
Old Dec 26, 2008 | 02:53 PM
  #9  
pro70z28's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 55
There is still plenty of traffic on the roads. That means cars are wearing out. That means pent up demand that "once the credit problems are worked out" should translate into sales for dealerships. American car makers & dealers just have to be smart about tapping into that demand and they should be on their way to solvency.

Looks good on paper anyway.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
marineengineer
New Member Introduction
3
Feb 9, 2015 03:59 AM
97TA-WS6-Con
Parts For Sale
7
Feb 1, 2015 01:01 PM
ChrisFrez
CamaroZ28.Com Podcast
1
Dec 21, 2014 09:47 PM
ChrisFrez
CamaroZ28.Com Podcast
1
Dec 15, 2014 03:09 PM
Fbodfather
Automotive News / Industry / Future Vehicle Discussion
25
Jun 21, 2002 04:12 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:14 PM.