General 1967-2002 F-Body Tech For general F-Body discussion that does not fit in any other forum.
For F-Body Technical/Information Discussion ONLY

Opinions: 160* + winter = good idea?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Dec 7, 2004 | 02:58 PM
  #1  
rlax31's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 1,005
From: Northern Virginia (Arlington)
Opinions: 160* + winter = good idea?

How are your cars in the winter with a 160* them? My car seems to not really run as strong till it warms up a bit. Should I just wait till summer?
Old Dec 7, 2004 | 04:09 PM
  #2  
Compstall's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 2,442
From: Tacoma, WA, USA
Re: Opinions: 160* + winter = good idea?

I put the 180 back in for winter months. You'll appreciate it when it's freezing ***** outside and you aren't waiting 20 minutes for any kind of heat to come out of the vents.
Old Dec 7, 2004 | 06:09 PM
  #3  
Kataklysm's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 2,264
From: Boston, MA
Re: Opinions: 160* + winter = good idea?

I keep the 160 in year round. Drove it all last winter (except when snow was on roads) with no troubles.
Old Dec 7, 2004 | 06:51 PM
  #4  
Birdman7389's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 1,736
From: Bay Area, CA
Re: Opinions: 160* + winter = good idea?

Mine runs great with the 160* and programming, but heat output is minimal. I may be putting a 180* back in for the next few months......
Old Dec 7, 2004 | 07:39 PM
  #5  
solty202003's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 75
From: cadillac, MI
Re: Opinions: 160* + winter = good idea?

I have a 160* stat in my thirdgen and drive it in the cold months and it seems to be ok. It actually still blows pretty warm heat, but does take a little longer to warm up. With gas prices the way they have been it kinda sucks to let it sit there and burn a bunch of fuel just to warm up. other then that i don't really notice any performance differences. I would change it in and out, but my manifold got a little messed up installing the 160* stat so we had to re-tap the threads and it worries me to change it in and out so much, so i just leave it in. But you should be ok!

-Lance
Old Dec 7, 2004 | 09:29 PM
  #6  
shoebox's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 1969
Posts: 27,730
From: Little Rock, AR
Re: Opinions: 160* + winter = good idea?

In the coldest months, I put the 180 back in. Better heat and I am assured that the engine does not run too cold.
Old Dec 7, 2004 | 09:44 PM
  #7  
ChevyTuffD.A.'s Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 1,214
From: Fort Bragg, NC
Re: Opinions: 160* + winter = good idea?

This is my first winter actually driving the car. I have a 160 and I dont really notice it taking too long to warm up. I wouldnt bother changing mine out.
Old Dec 7, 2004 | 10:02 PM
  #8  
LastZ4ME's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 72
From: Newport News VA
Re: Opinions: 160* + winter = good idea?

I have left my 160 in for the last 2 years, but previously switched to the 180 every winter. It has run fine, but like others have said , it takes a while to heat up. I wish I could post pics, but this is what ive done to help. I have two lower valances, or air dams. This is the big plastic piece under the front bumper that sounds horrible when you scrape the front end againt a low curb. It directs air up into the radiator. Ive cut 4 holes in my winter valance, about 3" in diameter. This allows a little air to pass through but enough to flow into the radiator. It's the same principle used on school buses in the winter. You'll see them with "tarps" covering up the entire grill in the winter months. My summer valance is stock, it takes a couple minutes to swap them out. My car still heats up SLOW in the winter, but when it does heat up, it STAYS heated with the "holed" valance. I usually put the summer one on in March, put the winter one on in January.

Last edited by LastZ4ME; Dec 7, 2004 at 10:10 PM.
Old Dec 7, 2004 | 11:14 PM
  #9  
Compstall's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 2,442
From: Tacoma, WA, USA
Re: Opinions: 160* + winter = good idea?

I can also provide a bit of proof that running the 160 isn't an excellent idea for winter.

I have a motorcycle that I ride to work and back, but that's about as far as it goes usually. My trip to work is short, and the bike doesn't get hot enough. I suspected that if I didn't ride it very far that all it's doing is building up moisture. One day I pulled the crankcase vent line and looked in it, and sure enough the line was clogged up like a fat man's artery with yellow snot lookin' stuff.

What this tells me is that indeed the engine isn't getting hot enough, and that moisture running through the crankcase vent line is mixing with a bit of oil/fuel and building up on the inside of the hose. It only gets worse if you don't get the engine up to a proper operating temperature and burn off the moisture inside.

On the coldest days when I had my 160 in, I could drive around all day, even down the highway and after getting off the highway I'd STILL have steam coming out of the pipes. This is why I now firmly believe that the 160 is not adequate for winter driving.
Old Dec 8, 2004 | 01:27 AM
  #10  
Z95m6's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 6,070
From: newton, kansas, USA
Re: Opinions: 160* + winter = good idea?

i leave mine in all year round. It definitely doesn't heat as well. I would wait until summer to put it in though.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
DirtyDaveW
Forced Induction
13
Dec 1, 2016 05:37 PM
89 iroc zl1
3rd Gen / L98 Engine Tech
0
Jan 14, 2015 02:18 AM
PFYC
Supporting Vendor Group Purchases and Sales
0
Dec 23, 2014 07:52 AM
Manaz101
Car Audio and Electronics
0
Aug 26, 2002 04:26 PM
Pandamonkey
Site Help and Suggestions
4
Aug 23, 2002 12:02 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:24 PM.