Advanced Tech Advanced tech discussion. Major rebuilds, engine theory, etc.
HIGH-END DISCUSSION ONLY - NOT FOR GENERAL TECH INFO

Pro's/Con's: 1-piece versus 2-piece seal cranks

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Sep 25, 2002 | 10:23 PM
  #1  
89WS6L98's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 23
Pro's/Con's: 1-piece versus 2-piece seal cranks

I was all set to buy a good quality USA made crank for my upcoming engine project. Then I found out the block I wanted is not available in a 1-piece rear main seal version. Kinda took the wind outta my sails.

Now, I need to do more research. I wanted a 1-piece so I could maintain a 'stock look' of my engine, using the stock small type balancer so that if a Smog tech looked down there, it at least would not be blatantly obvious my engine is not a L98 three-fifty.

I also have a very expensive 1-piece flywheel I wanted to use. Now, if I went with the 2-piece block, I am told there is a 1-piece seal conversion kit that can be installed. Is it strong? Will that conversion kit be OK to use on a big inch forced induction small block? Is it a waste of money? Should I just run with a 2-piece seal block and crank, and try to find a dampener that looks like my L98 original? I was told the 2-piece seal crank is stronger, due to a larger bolt pattern for the flywheel? How true is this?

I need advice. I have a limited budget, and I do not want to spend my money on the wrong stuff. Thanks guys!
Old Sep 26, 2002 | 09:53 AM
  #2  
cASe SenSiTive's Avatar
Exposed Member
 
Joined: May 1999
Posts: 647
From: Dangerously close to Detroit
Hmmm... I know that there's an adapter to fit a 2-piece seal crank into a 1-piece seal block. I don't know if you can go the other way.
Old Sep 26, 2002 | 01:31 PM
  #3  
G-BODYT56's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2000
Posts: 123
From: Panama City, Florida, USA
Lightbulb

Check out the Latest Chevy High Performance magazine. It appears that Scoggins and Dicky are now offering a 1-piece RMS GM BOW-TIE block, because of the growing demand for 1-piece RMS setups. Anyway, the block is CNC'd and offered in 2 versions, a 3.997 siamesed bore, and a sweet 4.117 siamesed bore, both utilize the desirable 2.45" main bore . The estimated cost is $1800. I will be saving for a large bore version for sure. To build a long rod solid roller 420. HTH's
Old Sep 26, 2002 | 10:18 PM
  #4  
89WS6L98's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 23
I'll check it out. Thank you!
Old Sep 27, 2002 | 10:07 AM
  #5  
cASe SenSiTive's Avatar
Exposed Member
 
Joined: May 1999
Posts: 647
From: Dangerously close to Detroit
Hmmm... That sounds like a nice piece.
I wonder if it would be financially feasable to do a bowtie or aftermarket LT1 block? Prolly not.
Old Sep 27, 2002 | 10:14 AM
  #6  
G-BODYT56's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2000
Posts: 123
From: Panama City, Florida, USA
Yeah, it would be nice if there was enough demand for someone to produce an AFTER-MARKET LT-1 BLOCK, so you could build a 420 power house without having to bleed for a 4" stroke crankshaft. With a LT-1 420 (4.155x3.875 combo), you could easily get into the low 10's and high 9's NORMALLY ASPIRATED with the current heads and cam selections available.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
HectorM52
Parts For Sale
26
Jul 30, 2017 11:46 AM
KamikaZ28
LT1 Based Engine Tech
1
May 28, 2015 12:45 AM
97FormulaWS-6
Car Audio and Electronics
5
Sep 11, 2002 11:57 AM
rje
Drag Racing Technique
7
Sep 9, 2002 12:35 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:43 PM.