V6 Tech 1967-2002 V6 Engine Related

K&n vs. SLP

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-17-2006, 10:21 AM
  #1  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
BlazeV638's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 14
K&n vs. SLP

I was just wondering I bought my car a little over a month ago and it came with a K&n FIPK system, I honestly hate the way this thing looks in my engine compartment. I was wondering if their are any gains on the slp Cai unit as compared to the K&n. I'm not the kind of person to just spend 250 on something that looks better but may not perform better any suggestions?
BlazeV638 is offline  
Old 03-17-2006, 10:59 AM
  #2  
Registered User
 
MyShibbyZ28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 1,783
Re: K&n vs. SLP

It will NOT perform any better, or any more to the point of noticeability. SLP uses K&N filters anyways.
MyShibbyZ28 is offline  
Old 03-17-2006, 02:02 PM
  #3  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
BlazeV638's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 14
Re: K&n vs. SLP

yeah i figured it wouldn't make much of a difference I just personally think the K&n tube is the ugliest thing in my engine bay. thanks for the reply thats 250 dollars better spent elsewhere.
BlazeV638 is offline  
Old 03-17-2006, 07:37 PM
  #4  
Registered User
 
LTR450HQ.com's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 70
Re: K&n vs. SLP

what year camaro do you have?
LTR450HQ.com is offline  
Old 03-18-2006, 11:33 AM
  #5  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
BlazeV638's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 14
Re: K&n vs. SLP

1996 Rs 3.8
BlazeV638 is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
G-BODYT56
Parts For Sale
6
01-14-2022 11:14 PM
n2oblkz
Parts For Sale
4
10-12-2015 01:53 AM
sahlomonic
Parts Wanted
0
09-22-2015 03:13 PM
tommalcolm
Computer Diagnostics and Tuning
2
09-11-2015 03:39 PM
rideordie
General 1967-2002 F-Body Tech
1
09-07-2015 08:22 AM



Quick Reply: K&n vs. SLP



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:08 AM.