Track Kill Stories Race Track Victories, 1/4 Mile Times, Dyno Numbers - DRIVE RESPONSIBLY

My Supercharged Z vs Supercharged Foxbody notchback...

Old Nov 19, 2007 | 10:38 AM
  #1  
CALL911's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 3,225
From: IN
My Supercharged Z vs Supercharged Foxbody notchback...

So my buddy has a 91 Mustang notchback which he has had dyno'd at over 500 RWHP. His car weighs a TON lighter than mine, plus I had a passenger on board, so we thought we'd play around to see what would happen. The actual dig sucked, as he took off only after the 2nd beep, and then I spun. The results were pretty obvious after I hooked up though Let me know what you guys think.

Click here to see Video

Last edited by CALL911; Nov 21, 2007 at 03:10 AM.
Old Nov 19, 2007 | 11:59 AM
  #2  
Pyrodawg's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 434
From: Utica, NY and Jacksonville, FL
hey whered you get the HUD from?

nice pull btw
Old Nov 19, 2007 | 12:11 PM
  #3  
CALL911's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 3,225
From: IN
Originally Posted by Pyrodawg
hey whered you get the HUD from?

nice pull btw
Got it from LPE years ago. Thanks for the compliment
Old Nov 19, 2007 | 03:12 PM
  #4  
Mikie's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 1999
Posts: 594
From: Belmont North Carolina.
Excellent. You car is extremely nasty...ehhmmm In a good way
Old Nov 19, 2007 | 04:43 PM
  #5  
snorkelface's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 1,320
From: Alta Loma, CA
Schweeeet.

Last edited by snorkelface; Nov 19, 2007 at 10:22 PM.
Old Nov 19, 2007 | 10:04 PM
  #6  
reimer96z's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 63
From: Cincinnati, OH
so his car weighs a ton lighter than yours
Old Nov 20, 2007 | 01:00 AM
  #7  
LastBreedLS1's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 122
that was a very insane kill!!
Old Nov 20, 2007 | 01:14 AM
  #8  
red_94z's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 99
From: Ms
Was 160+ really needed lol
Old Nov 20, 2007 | 08:55 AM
  #9  
Z-RATED94's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 3,557
From: Carol Stream, Il.
Originally Posted by red_94z
Was 160+ really needed lol
And it didn't take too long either!
Old Nov 20, 2007 | 02:32 PM
  #10  
stroked 383's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 308
From: IL
I am honor'd to say I have your old tires/wheels that were on that car....you give me something to shoot for! Insane man I'm jealous.
Old Nov 20, 2007 | 02:34 PM
  #11  
CALL911's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 3,225
From: IN
Originally Posted by reimer96z
so his car weighs a ton lighter than yours
I believe the notchback Foxbody was the lightest they made in the 80-early 90's mustangs. Somewhere around mid to high 2,000 lb range. Mine weighs 3400 empty, plus I had a passenger with me video taping, so "yes" he was a bit lighter.

Originally Posted by red_94z
Was 160+ really needed lol
I knew the camera was rolling so I figured I'd continue the run to show of the brutal top end power of the car. When I let off the gas, and looked up the HUD said 178! To this day, thats the fastest the car has seen while it has been supercharged.
Old Nov 21, 2007 | 01:21 AM
  #12  
TrickStang37's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 619
the notchback (stock) weighs in around 3100 lbs.

Last edited by TrickStang37; Nov 21, 2007 at 01:24 AM.
Old Nov 21, 2007 | 02:46 AM
  #13  
CALL911's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 3,225
From: IN
Originally Posted by TrickStang37
the notchback (stock) weighs in around 3100 lbs.
I know he has made the car lighter than it came from the factory, but I thought stock it was lighter than that. Either way, I still had him by more than a couple hundred pounds.
Old Nov 21, 2007 | 02:55 AM
  #14  
TrickStang37's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 619
it would take some real gutting to get the weight that low. I had a 5.0 GT and it weighed about 3150 and that was with alum heads, intake, removed smog stuff, alum radiator, removed a/c, removed spare, removed fog lights and brackets, removed front sway bar and a couple other little things. GT's only weigh 75-100 lbs more.
Old Nov 21, 2007 | 03:10 AM
  #15  
CALL911's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 3,225
From: IN
Originally Posted by TrickStang37
it would take some real gutting to get the weight that low. I had a 5.0 GT and it weighed about 3150 and that was with alum heads, intake, removed smog stuff, alum radiator, removed a/c, removed spare, removed fog lights and brackets, removed front sway bar and a couple other little things. GT's only weigh 75-100 lbs more.
To be specific, I don't believe his car is a "GT" (I edited my orginal post). It is a 5.0 notchback. The GT's have different bumpers, sideskirts, and spoilers. His doesn't have any of that stuff, and he's done some weight reduction like yanking the spare tire, and the air conditioning. He told me he figured his car weighed 800 lbs or so lighter than mine, so I just figured the math and posted what I thought he would be at. I didn't get any "actual" proof of weight from him or anything. I have another friend who had a notchback as well, and I know he told me it was the lightest as well.

Last edited by CALL911; Nov 21, 2007 at 03:13 AM.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Hal Fisher
Parts For Sale
0
Sep 30, 2015 09:03 PM
HAWG
Drag Racing Technique
2
Sep 25, 2015 11:41 AM
DelSoto
Forced Induction
4
Sep 19, 2015 05:31 AM
rideordie
General 1967-2002 F-Body Tech
1
Sep 7, 2015 08:22 AM


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:50 AM.