Track Kill Stories Race Track Victories, 1/4 Mile Times, Dyno Numbers - DRIVE RESPONSIBLY

94z Vs. 95 3000gt Vr-4

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Oct 14, 2004 | 05:50 PM
  #1  
94_Green_Beast's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 12
94z Vs. 95 3000gt Vr-4

One of my buddys went around running his mouth, calling himself the V8 killer because he beat a bone-stock 95 mustang GT, So I pull up the other night just wanting to see the car, he had just gotten it a few days ago. And he let me drive it, I was quite impressed, still didn't feel the same seat-of-pants effect like my camaro will give. AWD really is impressive, and i admitted the hed probably get me from a dead stop, simply because I have possibly the worst launch in history, But after I left we decided to go back to a bar about 15 miles away, I looked in my mirror and saw him pulling so I put the Z in 4th, don't know why I did that, he got right beside me and nailed it, I humored him, we were absolutely dead locked to about the 115 range, we go again, from about a 20MPH roll, this time I had the z in 1st, I absolutely owned the big bad AWD, Twin Turbo V8 killer, all the way to 140, I told him not to call himself a V8 killer, until he could beat a stock LT1.
Old Oct 14, 2004 | 09:12 PM
  #2  
ScrmngChckn95's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 173
From: Denver, Colorado
Re: 94z Vs. 95 3000gt Vr-4

good kill


Are those 95s the ones with the new body style with 320hp or the older body style with about 295?
Old Oct 14, 2004 | 09:32 PM
  #3  
Z28COnrad's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 139
From: Lafayette, LA
Re: 94z Vs. 95 3000gt Vr-4

old body style = 90(91?)-93

new body style= 94+
Old Oct 14, 2004 | 10:03 PM
  #4  
94_Green_Beast's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 12
Re: 94z Vs. 95 3000gt Vr-4

I still don't think I stand a chance in the 1/8. Those AWD launches are something fierce, I saw dump the clutch at redline, and it still wouldn't spin, of course hes gonna really mess something up doing it but its still cool.
Old Oct 14, 2004 | 10:51 PM
  #5  
John M's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 1998
Posts: 11
From: Milledgeville, GA
Re: 94z Vs. 95 3000gt Vr-4

Stock, they are only equal to a LT1 excluding the launch. 100 mph traps are just average these days. If he gets his hands on a downpipe and boost controller, it will get much more interesting, to the tune of ~ 8.20s in the 1/8th and 103-105 mph traps in the 1/4.

If he continues to drop the clutch at redline, he's going to need a transmission. Rebuilds are $2k; factory new ones are pushing $7k. Just a decent clutch is $550, plus at least $300 for install. A quick slip from 4500 will net 60ft times in the 1.7x range without hurting tranny life.
Old Oct 14, 2004 | 10:53 PM
  #6  
blackztpi's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 1,810
From: Indiana
Re: 94z Vs. 95 3000gt Vr-4

yeah, kids around here are into the awd dsm's and a couple stealths/3000gt's. seen many redline clutch dumps. one kid is replacing a clutch, the other a drive axle, and another the tranny. 3000gt vr-4 kid actually knows what he's doing and still broke a tranny, wounded the shifting of another, and i believe he even broke a driveshaft or a u joint or something. i kinda like those vr-4's vs. the common dsm, but i hear not many people, if any, make aftermarket drivetrain parts to hold the power down.
Old Oct 14, 2004 | 11:27 PM
  #7  
orbitalshock2k's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 220
Re: 94z Vs. 95 3000gt Vr-4

They changed the headlight style for their last year in production. The Spyder VR-4 resale value is still in the 30s and up.
Old Oct 14, 2004 | 11:33 PM
  #8  
Antz97ZNJ's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 3,223
From: Browns Mills, New Jersey
Re: 94z Vs. 95 3000gt Vr-4

They feel good on the hwy I have to admit(i was impressed myself), but w/ your mods watch out he does a few small things your owned
Old Oct 19, 2004 | 07:47 PM
  #9  
Bersaglieri's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 5,907
From: The Wild West
Re: 94z Vs. 95 3000gt Vr-4

Nice kill, does anyone know what one running 12lbs of boost would clock in the 1/4?

-Dustin-
Old Oct 19, 2004 | 11:19 PM
  #10  
John M's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 1998
Posts: 11
From: Milledgeville, GA
Re: 94z Vs. 95 3000gt Vr-4

That's stock - anywhere from 13.6 to 14.0 depending on driver and condition of the car.
Old Oct 20, 2004 | 11:58 AM
  #11  
Bersaglieri's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 5,907
From: The Wild West
Re: 94z Vs. 95 3000gt Vr-4

Hey thanks alot, a buddy of mine rode in a 95 with 12lbs and said it felt faster than my Z, but that was before the Hooker LT's, ORY, and LPE Supertube.

-Dustin-
Old Oct 20, 2004 | 02:19 PM
  #12  
dmanc93's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 15
From: hanoverton, ohio
Re: 94z Vs. 95 3000gt Vr-4

He had 14lbs dustin , because we bumped it up after we installed a boost controller and gage. Im not sure if it felt faster or not, because its a different feeling than the torquey lt1, but i sure know that it got to 120 hella fast.

dan
Old Oct 20, 2004 | 02:35 PM
  #13  
toneloc12345's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 586
From: OHIO
Re: 94z Vs. 95 3000gt Vr-4

Too bad they weigh close to 4000lbs (vr4s)

TONY
Old Oct 20, 2004 | 03:17 PM
  #14  
Garbage's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 9
Re: 94z Vs. 95 3000gt Vr-4

Not suprised you destroyed him, i murdered one out in the valley. Wasnt even close.
Old Oct 20, 2004 | 05:22 PM
  #15  
John M's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 1998
Posts: 11
From: Milledgeville, GA
Re: 94z Vs. 95 3000gt Vr-4

So what if they weigh 4000 lbs? They go fast, stop fast, and turn fast. Do you realize that a Lamborghini also weighs that much? I'm sure people in Miatas make fun of "heavy" F-bodies all the time.

A VR4 at 14 psi should do at least 13.20 with no other mods whatsoever. Spend a grand - downpipe, fuel injectors, fuel controller - and it'll be as quick as mine was.



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:32 AM.