For some reason this thing doesnt want to go any faster than 13.90@100.05 mph in the quarter here is the time slip.

60ft: 1.95
330ft: 5.897
1/8: 8.923
et:13.90
mph: 100.09

This pass was with no rear seat, 1/8 tank of gas, no spare and jack, with D/R's on welds.

It runs the same with my D/R's or street tires, I launch by power braking to 1200(stock stall) off the brake and on the gas. Cooling it down , modifing timing, modifing fuel curve, turned off tcc, tried S/D mode, no knock retard (no knock) agressive curves etc.

Doesn't this seem slow for that kind of 60ft,330ft,1/8 mile??

 

2.73 gear? What bolt ons do you have?

a nice '60 helps your ET, but not your MPH.

 

3.42's , 58mm t/body, intake to t/body port matched, flowmaster cat back, msd coil, k&n fipk, a4, 3in. cat bypass pipe, tunercat

 

Sorry to ***** up your threads.

The TB does not really help much at stockish power levels. Flowmaster is ok, nothing great. Probably nothing really from the coil or cat bypass...maybe a few HP.

I'd say your MPH should have been a little higher, not a whole lot though. Track location or density altitude plays its part as well.


If you put some nice headers on there, and maybe try a proven tune from madwolf, That would be a nice jump.

 

the thing is theres a couple ppl here saying it should run bout 13.3-13.4 with what I currently have. btw-at sea level, 65-70* night

 

You need headers. Also was your pcm tuned for the 58mm tb. I see you have tunercat but is it tuned for the TB. If so i think it effects the shifting of your A4.

 

Get a gear,LT's and valve springs and ya might.
What ya shifting at?

It takes 100lbs to equal a tenth so ya didn't do much with the spare and seat

 

I tried shifting the a4 at anywhere from 5600-6200, I dont have a wideband but I have changed the fuel and timing curves quite a bit (more fuel/less fuel w/ more timing/less timing). I did run a 13.9 last saturday w/full interior and spare, underdrives (removed friday for charging problem) and with an agressive timing curve that was pinging. I notice on my datalog airflow can peak as high as 280grams/sec

 

I've heard that you should be able to take the grams/sec and times that by 1.1 and that should give you an approx. rear horse power range. If so you aren't doing so bad but your times aren't reflecting that.

 

and where did you hear that??

 

on this forum, and from what i've seen its reasonably accurate.

 

so I would have like 308 rear wheel hp???