Seriously. Time for a board upgrade dudes.

Subscribe
May 29, 2009 | 11:51 AM
  #16  
Quote: looks at join date
He's been here a while trust me, some stuff happened way before you got here.
Reply
May 29, 2009 | 01:45 PM
  #17  
Not sure why but in the past few years this board has taken a bit hit in its volume. Seems to still be geared to Lt1 owners for some reason and whoever wants to argue that go take a look at the for sale section on ny given day lol.
Reply
May 29, 2009 | 04:26 PM
  #18  
Quote: Not sure why but in the past few years this board has taken a bit hit in its volume. Seems to still be geared to Lt1 owners for some reason and whoever wants to argue that go take a look at the for sale section on ny given day lol.
If the new Camaro ever gets a Z28 version I'm sure traffic will pick right back up.

And LOL at reading this old thread. I like the "ohhh who cares about pictures, it's just fluff, not a big deal". Now everyone's attitude is "PICS OR GTFO!!!!!!"
Reply
Jun 30, 2009 | 11:43 AM
  #19  
Quote: So Jason what's next? Enable IMG in sigs?
Please Jason, NO!
Reply
Jun 30, 2009 | 12:07 PM
  #20  
Currently only for a very few select special guests (like Scott Settlemire, etc.) and site advertisers. We took a poll on it a long time ago and majority agreed that they get annoying seeing them over and over and over again in a thread. Perhaps if in the future we could make it so they would appear in the user's first post of the thread and then appear as a link in every subsequent post of the thread. Something like that may work but I would have to see what it would take to make it happen.
Reply
Jun 30, 2009 | 01:00 PM
  #21  
Quote: Currently only for a very few select special guests (like Scott Settlemire, etc.) and site advertisers. We took a poll on it a long time ago and majority agreed that they get annoying seeing them over and over and over again in a thread. Perhaps if in the future we could make it so they would appear in the user's first post of the thread and then appear as a link in every subsequent post of the thread. Something like that may work but I would have to see what it would take to make it happen.
How about we just keep them for VIPs only.
Reply
Jun 30, 2009 | 06:48 PM
  #22  
speaking of vips, anybody got a high-res version of fbodfather's current sig image?

and images in signatures is just a waste of time, cause then you'll get animated images and that slows down computers/wastes my time.
Reply
Jun 30, 2009 | 07:01 PM
  #23  
Quote: speaking of vips, anybody got a high-res version of fbodfather's current sig image?
https://www.camaroz28.com/gallery/ma...g2_itemId=1898

Quote:
and images in signatures is just a waste of time, cause then you'll get animated images and that slows down computers/wastes my time.
That seems to be the consensus.
Reply
Jun 30, 2009 | 10:42 PM
  #24  
Quote: So Jason what's next? Enable IMG in sigs?
Quote: Please Jason, NO!
I'm with mdenz...I hate pics in sigs when everyone had them...Scott's is fine, but I'm glad you feel the same way
Reply
Aug 12, 2009 | 04:26 PM
  #25  
Dear lord please never allow images in sigs. I can't stand that crap.
Reply
Oct 28, 2009 | 12:21 PM
  #26  
Quote: Dear lord please never allow images in sigs. I can't stand that crap.
This.

-Dustin-
Reply
Oct 28, 2009 | 12:49 PM
  #27  
I came into this thread and read the first post before I noticed the date, and was thinking, "What the heck site is this guy looking at? We've had all of that stuff for years!"



I'd be okay with images in sigs, but it would have to be severely restricted on size, subject to approval, and no animated GIFs allowed.
Reply
Oct 28, 2009 | 01:11 PM
  #28  
Hey Jason, is project 396 still for sale?
Reply
Apr 15, 2010 | 05:20 PM
  #29  
Quote: Hey Jason, is project 396 still for sale?
the link still works LOL

https://www.camaroz28.com/bb/Forum6/HTML/066084.html

and its even got my posts in it
Reply
Subscribe