How dissapointed well you guys be if the gas filll location gets moved to the more standard location that GM uses? ????????? Thats All I'am saying on this subject.

 

Things have been a little slow lately.

Sounds like an interesting poll if someone wanted to start one.


GM OSHAWA................man I wish you could tell us what all you know.

 

my thoughts exactly.

 

I like the concepts location, but moving it won't stop me from buying one.

 

I'm gonna miss reaching across 6 feet of dashboard to clean the windshield. I was just getting used to that...

 

I think the fuel door is actually a good idea... ...Except for a rear collision possibility. = Possibility of spilled fuel. I'd rather spill fuel on the back of the license plate than on the paint.

 

I spill gas on my GN every time I fill it up. I swear, there's no clean way to do it. It sucks.

It's also a pain to hold the plate down while you fill up. You can't just put the nozzle in and let it fill... you have to hold the damn thing the whole time.

 

What I'll miss on the 2009 Camaro will be the $3,600 MSRP that was on my 69 Z/28 when I bought it new! <VBG>
Clyde

 

For the gas tank, I like the old 1969 Dodge(I know, I know) Charger location, It reminds me of a race car.

For the T-Tops, I would love to see those also, but didn't they leak, and cause stress on the frame? I don't know...I do know they leak though!

I'm not concerned with the trunk, although a hatch trunk is a nice thing to have.

 

Ditto

 

a guy on turbobuick.com that goes by the name of red regal t can help you out. he sells stay down license plate brackets, they work beautifully.

 

I think this mule shot gives you an idea of what we can expect wheel size wise.

 

oops, got mixed up last night when posting this. Wrong thread. Sorry!

 

i always thought the gas behind the licenseplate was cool as hell

 

And you'll continue to feel that way until you own a car with that setup. It sucks royal ***.