LT1 Based Engine Tech 1993-1997 LT1/LT4 Engine Related

Stock timing chain slack...

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Nov 12, 2003 | 09:29 AM
  #1  
madwolf's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 4,577
From: DeKalb, IL
Arrow Stock timing chain slack...

I just installed a new stock timing chain with a new crank and cam gear and the dots are aligned, but I think I'm getting a little more slack on the right side than on the left side. I'm pretty sure the old one was the same way.
I tried taking it off and reinstalling it +one tooth and the dots were off after that, so I just put it back like it was. Is this normal? If so, should the slack be on the right side or on the left side?
Thanks.
Old Nov 12, 2003 | 01:18 PM
  #2  
madwolf's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 4,577
From: DeKalb, IL
TTT
Old Nov 12, 2003 | 01:45 PM
  #3  
Don 97 SS's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 1,041
From: Robinson, IL
I'm not sure but I thought any slack would be on the right side (when looking at it on the engine). Wait for others to comment.

When I installed the GMPP ED timing set there was much less slack than with the oem LT1 chain.
Old Nov 12, 2003 | 09:17 PM
  #4  
$hawn's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 642
From: Wichita, Kansas
When you were checking the slack, did you have the retainer bolts tightened, when I did mine I just slid it on with out tightening the bolts and it was real loose, then once I tightened them the slack ws out, just a though it thats how you did it.
Old Nov 12, 2003 | 10:45 PM
  #5  
shoebox's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 1969
Posts: 27,725
From: Little Rock, AR
A teeny bit of rotation of the cam or crank sprocket with transfer the slack from one side to the other. When running, the side that is "pulling" the chain will have less slack than the other side. Not really anything to worry about.
Old Nov 12, 2003 | 11:07 PM
  #6  
VeryBad's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 35
From: Bothell, WA
I was concerned about the slack with the extreme duty set I put in mine. I called the guys at Lingenfelter and they said not to worry about it.

Gordon
WitchHunter Performance
http://www.witchhunter.com
Old Nov 12, 2003 | 11:14 PM
  #7  
96 WS6's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 1,967
From: Bay Area, CA, USA
Originally posted by shoebox
A teeny bit of rotation of the cam or crank sprocket with transfer the slack from one side to the other. When running, the side that is "pulling" the chain will have less slack than the other side. Not really anything to worry about.
Yup.
Old Nov 12, 2003 | 11:16 PM
  #8  
S.J.S.'s Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: May 1999
Posts: 2,201
From: HI.
Just put mine in on sat. and it was the same way. about 1/8th to 1/4in. slack on the right side and barely any on the left side. Machinist told me it was normal.
Old Nov 12, 2003 | 11:36 PM
  #9  
J's 82's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 316
From: Idaho Falls, Idaho
This brings up an interesting point.. I have seen 5 Lt1 timing chains over the last few months with various mileage (40-190k).. all of them seemed to have a large amount of slack..

I switched to a comp double roller and it was much tighter.. now I am wondering is that designed into the LT1s or do they stretch too much.. just seems a bit low quality to me..
Old Nov 13, 2003 | 07:12 AM
  #10  
Don 97 SS's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 1,041
From: Robinson, IL
Originally posted by J's 82
This brings up an interesting point.. I have seen 5 Lt1 timing chains over the last few months with various mileage (40-190k).. all of them seemed to have a large amount of slack..

I switched to a comp double roller and it was much tighter.. now I am wondering is that designed into the LT1s or do they stretch too much.. just seems a bit low quality to me..
That is what I have hear from those with more knowledge than me. The oem LT1 "laminated" chain seems to be a little whimpy.

The GMPP LT1/LT4 ED timing set should be the oem version. It is a nice step up from that el cheapo oem. But GM should be ashamed from what they charge for it.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
HectorM52
Parts For Sale
26
Jul 30, 2017 11:46 AM
phoenix95
General 1967-2002 F-Body Tech
1
Jan 8, 2015 02:44 PM
phoenix95
General 1967-2002 F-Body Tech
2
Jan 8, 2015 09:14 AM
Queens94z28
Parts For Sale
3
Dec 20, 2014 09:11 PM
siguy
Parts For Sale
3
Nov 27, 2014 10:07 AM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:42 AM.