Ok to extend IAT wires?
I want to move the IAT over into the Moroso CAI ducting, but wire is too short to do so. I've got some 18 gauge wire handy but I wanted to check with you guys to see if it will screw up the resistance on the sensor to lengthen the stock wiring. (95 Z28)
Thanks! |
You can just get a 4.5kOhm resister for the IAT sensor and it tells the PCM thatthe air coming in is 40*F.
Do a search on here for "resistor mod" or "IAT resistor" to be sure of what size resistor, but I am pretty sure it is 4.5kOhm. |
Originally Posted by '94 Bad A Z28
(Post 5874695)
You can just get a 4.5kOhm resister for the IAT sensor and it tells the PCM thatthe air coming in is 40*F.
Or is it so if you're MAF has a failure, speed density mode will no longer work as it won't know the temperature if the intake air? or is it just to mess up quick-throttle fueling transitions? :confused: |
Originally Posted by MikeGyver
(Post 5875256)
Why...? So the computer enriches the air/fuel mixture beyond the stock settings (which many people believe is already too rich)? If you want more power lean it out a bit if anything.
Or is it so if you're MAF has a failure, speed density mode will no longer work as it won't know the temperature if the intake air? or is it just to mess up quick-throttle fueling transitions? :confused: |
Originally Posted by '94 Bad A Z28
(Post 5874695)
You can just get a 4.5kOhm resister for the IAT sensor and it tells the PCM thatthe air coming in is 40*F.
Do a search on here for "resistor mod" or "IAT resistor" to be sure of what size resistor, but I am pretty sure it is 4.5kOhm. Such a bad thing to do. |
Wow, this thread kinda got side tracked huh? :rolleyes:
I did a search about extending the IAT [I]WIRES[I] but came up empty. In other words, splice in a couple lengths of wire to make the sensor reach farther over to the driver's side front where the Moroso intake ducting is. I want to keep the sensor active (computer using it). Without arguing over whether or not it should be "resistored" this time, can someone tell me if this is ok to do? Thanks |
I did it years ago and haven't had any problems with it. I'm sure it's not the best way as I have seen plug in extension harnesses, but whatever works.
|
Lol sorry, we didn't mean to hi-jack your thread.
Yes you can extend the wires as long as you want. It will not alter the total resistance or anything. I would definitely solder and heat shrink them though. |
Originally Posted by IFLYAZ
(Post 5875627)
Wow, this thread kinda got side tracked huh? :rolleyes:
I did a search about extending the IAT [I]WIRES[I] but came up empty. In other words, splice in a couple lengths of wire to make the sensor reach farther over to the driver's side front where the Moroso intake ducting is. I want to keep the sensor active (computer using it). Without arguing over whether or not it should be "resistored" this time, can someone tell me if this is ok to do? Thanks Not sure why you would think the sensor is not "active" in the stock location. |
Adding length to the wires will always add resistance, but as long as you use a wire size larger than the wires you are extending, you will not add enough resistance to the circuit to make a significant difference in the IAT readings. The IAT sensor has a resistance ranging from 9,420 ohms at 32*F to 667 ohms at 140*F.
|
Originally Posted by Injuneer
(Post 5875948)
Adding length to the wires will always add resistance, but as long as you use a wire size larger than the wires you are extending, you will not add enough resistance to the circuit to make a significant difference in the IAT readings. The IAT sensor has a resistance ranging from 9,420 ohms at 32*F to 667 ohms at 140*F.
As long as you dont add 10 or 20 THOUSAND feet of wire to your IAT, you'll be just fine :rolleyes: |
Originally Posted by Kevin Blown 95 TA
(Post 5875368)
So, have you found the programming tables for it in TC or LT1 Edit?
|
Originally Posted by shoebox
(Post 5875941)
Not sure why you would think the sensor is not "active" in the stock location.
The "active" reference was to let people know I want the computer to read it as it was meant to be read in the stock location or new location, not use a resistor to fool the computer. By the way, shoebox, thank you for your website! It has helped me out with many different projects over the years! Thanks also to everyone else for the suggestions. |
have you done the throttle body heater delete mod?
|
A more realistic temperature would be obtained closer to the engine because air will be cooler at the begining of the intake track then by the time it gets into the engine.
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:32 PM. |
© 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands