LT1 Based Engine Tech 1993-1997 LT1/LT4 Engine Related

Hi mileage lt1 that are stock please!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old May 3, 2007 | 06:55 PM
  #1  
mrmint69's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 2,728
From: Post Falls, Idaho
Hi mileage lt1 that are stock please!

I am looking for numbers for stock lt1's with roughly 90k to 130k miles. I would like to see what the average 0-60 & 1/4 mile times are if you fit the group. I made a 1/4 pass at 14.53 and my 0-60 time was 7.3 before i did my mods. I am trying to figure if this is average or how to gauge my engine alone since it is 100% stock with bolt ons only.
Old May 3, 2007 | 07:06 PM
  #2  
2000GTP's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 12,312
From: Aurora, IL
The previous owner of my car pulled off times ranging in the 14.7-15.2 range with 93K on the odometer in stock trim. When I took the car though, I found several things such as fouled plugs, old wires, and a couple exhaust leaks which I'm sure were responsible for the below average times. Other factors can play a part in your particular time as well such as track conditions and traction.
Old May 3, 2007 | 07:23 PM
  #3  
er-z's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 93
From: elyria,oh
mine ran a 13.8 @100 mph with slp intake and flowmaster muffer
Old May 3, 2007 | 07:31 PM
  #4  
AmericanMuscle33's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 378
From: Ellensburg, WA
1.9 60ft, 13.84 @ 100.12...that was with 150,000 miles on a completely stock car. Otherthan, 275 series tires, K&N filter... Everything else was stock or OEM replacement (WP, Opti, etc).

Those were the good ol' days...

For comparison purposes, beware most of the people likely to post will be of faster times...(i.e. some people with a 15 sec e.t. may not exactly feel like sharing)

And btw...bolt'ons or 'ins means you're car isnt stock

That leaves one hell of a grey area...
Old May 3, 2007 | 07:48 PM
  #5  
buzz12586's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 1,357
From: Charlotte, NC
Originally Posted by AmericanMuscle33
1.9 60ft, 13.84 @ 100.12...that was with 150,000 miles on a completely stock car. Otherthan, 275 series tires, K&N filter...

In other words it wasn't stock
Old May 3, 2007 | 07:59 PM
  #6  
landstuhltaylor's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 199
From: Methuen/UMass Dartmouth
Originally Posted by buzz12586
In other words it wasn't stock
the filter wont make much of a difference at all, and those 60 fts are in line with stock cars
Old May 3, 2007 | 08:10 PM
  #7  
Nitelite's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 171
From: Missouri
Mine was an A4, mostly stock with the exception of 3 inch exhaust and a k&n filter, would run a 14.5-14.7. Shortly after I got it, found out the gears were 2.73. Since then I swapped out for 3.73s, some Nitto's, and a great tuning from pcm4less, I'm happy to say that I run mid 13s now
Old May 4, 2007 | 12:18 PM
  #8  
stereomandan's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 3,620
From: Saginaw, Michigan
If the car was well maintained, there is no reason that it won't perform the same as it did at 10,000 miles.

Stock LT1 times are in the very high 13's to mid-low 14's. Trap speeds for a M6 are usually 98-101 mph.

0-60 isn't something most people can measure, stock it is 5.3-5.7 seconds.

Dan
Old May 4, 2007 | 12:26 PM
  #9  
oneclean97z's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 301
From: North Houston, TX
Originally Posted by stereomandan
If the car was well maintained, there is no reason that it won't perform the same as it did at 10,000 miles.

Stock LT1 times are in the very high 13's to mid-low 14's. Trap speeds for a M6 are usually 98-101 mph.

0-60 isn't something most people can measure, stock it is 5.3-5.7 seconds.

Dan
this is true, i make da** sure i get every oil change, trans, differential, tune-up on or before time, im hoping to break 150,000 and still be holding my ground well. im at 93,000 and the 0-60 mph test i ran i had about 6 seconds even but then again its my phone stopwatch
Old May 4, 2007 | 12:30 PM
  #10  
AmericanMuscle33's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 378
From: Ellensburg, WA
Originally Posted by buzz12586
In other words it wasn't stock
Yeah, technically it wasn't stock. But it's close enough for comparison.

Woop dee doo.
Old May 4, 2007 | 01:44 PM
  #11  
mrmint69's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 2,728
From: Post Falls, Idaho
I told the truth only because i have changed the car and it it much faster than stock. Otherwise i would take about a 1/2 second off the 1/4 time.
Old May 4, 2007 | 02:00 PM
  #12  
buzz12586's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 1,357
From: Charlotte, NC
Originally Posted by AmericanMuscle33
Yeah, technically it wasn't stock. But it's close enough for comparison.

Woop dee doo.

Ok then, my car went 13.07 @ 108 stock.
Old May 5, 2007 | 01:37 AM
  #13  
Style's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 105
From: Milwaukee Area, WI
Originally Posted by buzz12586
Ok then, my car went 13.07 @ 108 stock.
with 275 tires and an air filter??? Holy crap!
Old May 5, 2007 | 01:38 AM
  #14  
buzz12586's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 1,357
From: Charlotte, NC
245 tires, CAI, catback
Old May 5, 2007 | 01:41 AM
  #15  
Style's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 105
From: Milwaukee Area, WI
Originally Posted by buzz12586
245 tires, CAI, catback
wow. that is a pretty good time for those mods. Nice run!



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:04 AM.