LT1 Based Engine Tech 1993-1997 LT1/LT4 Engine Related

DYNO of THREE Z28's

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Mar 28, 2004 | 01:44 AM
  #1  
Xride's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 1,622
From: Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
DYNO of THREE Z28's

Well we had a club dyno day, and there were 3 Z28's

a 95 Z28 130k KM (~80k miles) M6 3.42
STOCK down to the paper airfilter
251 rwhp and 305 rwtq


96 Z28 140k miles M6 3.42
STOCK down to the paper airfilter
253 rwhp and 297 rwtq


and my car

96 SS 18k miles all runs with paper airfilter in the ss intake. M6 3.42
Stock, with the same as z28 exhaust
256 rwhp and 289 rwtq

then with cat back exhaust (magnaflow)
263 rwhp and 304 rwtq

then with madwolf power tuning
270 rwtq and 305 rwtq

___________________________
EDIT, adding graphs


www.speedinc.ca/catbacktune.jpg

the blue one is with the cat back, and the red one is with the tune too.
I made lots of runs, but just kept the two best ones on the graph.


www.speedinc.ca/baseline.jpg
this is stock for me.



this is a graph with all three of us, best runs.

www.speedinc.ca/allthree.jpg

I'm green,
the 95 is red
and hte 96z28 is blue

____________________



Now my Question

Why was I so much less in the torque area?
and I'm kinda disapointed with my catback gains.


All runs on the same Dynojet and ASE corrected.
working on getting the graphs online

Last edited by Xride; Mar 28, 2004 at 12:11 PM.
Old Mar 28, 2004 | 01:50 AM
  #2  
97WS6SCharged's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 4,784
From: Jacksonville
What was different between the cars?

6 speeeds/autos

Gears

Need more info.
Old Mar 28, 2004 | 01:57 AM
  #3  
Xride's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 1,622
From: Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
Originally posted by 97WS6SCharged
What was different between the cars?

6 speeeds/autos

Gears

Need more info.
Edited

All 6 speeds, all 3.42
Old Mar 28, 2004 | 02:42 AM
  #4  
97WS6SCharged's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 4,784
From: Jacksonville
You weren't really down all that far on torque. You were only off by 8 lbs from the average (which happens to be 297). If all three of you had done three pulls exactly the same, most likely all of you would have gone up and down on the numbers some. Go get some mods and blow those other guys away on the next dyno day.
Old Mar 28, 2004 | 03:14 AM
  #5  
RE AND CHERYL's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 2,140
From: DOVER DE
Cool

How close the power figures were blows me away. Factory engines tend to be all over the place on power. Sometimes there can be a 20 HP difference between two identical engines. I am kinda courious that you were down a little on torque, especially since the SS is supposed to be rated higher than the Z28.

I wouldn't be too bumed about your cat back power figures. The real power is in the cat and headers. You open that up and you cat back can really shine. I would love to get my car base linned but there is no place within 50 miles with a dyno.
Old Mar 28, 2004 | 07:57 AM
  #6  
Brent94Z's Avatar
Super Moderator
 
Joined: May 1999
Posts: 4,060
From: Inverness, FL
Your cat-back gains were pretty much normal. Why were you disappointed? I wouldn't be... like I said, that's pretty normal
Old Mar 28, 2004 | 08:58 AM
  #7  
LT1ponykilla's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 1,035
From: Greenville, SC
That just goes to show that the ram airs dont make that much power over a regular intake box or cai.
Old Mar 28, 2004 | 09:55 AM
  #8  
david97gsxr's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 369
From: Martinsville, Indiana
another thing you have to consider. is the entire graph.
if they're making 305 tq, at 2800, but everywhere before/after that they're only making 240 or less....

but you're making above 250 through the entire RPM band, you're going to pull harder through the entire rpms.

i'm not saying that's the case, but if it is, that might make you feel better.

i'd rather have an engine that made a constant 300 rwtq(which would be almost impossible), than one that just spiked up to 350 really quick and dropped off before and after that.
Old Mar 28, 2004 | 10:51 AM
  #9  
brain's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 1998
Posts: 746
From: Columbia, SC, USA
Did they log the air/fuel? I'd like to see if there was a difference in how rich each car ran, and if any of Madwolf's changes were noticeable. 7 rwhp on power tuning is impressive.
Old Mar 28, 2004 | 11:59 AM
  #10  
david97gsxr's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 369
From: Martinsville, Indiana
Originally posted by LT1ponykilla
That just goes to show that the ram airs dont make that much power over a regular intake box or cai.
i assume you're talking about the SS's ram air.....
well, i'm not arguing that ram-air is better than a CAI, or that ram air even works. BUT. seeing as how they're on a dyno, and not moving, therefore no air is being "rammed". i don't see how you could get ram air isn't any better from this comprasison.
Old Mar 28, 2004 | 12:11 PM
  #11  
Xride's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 1,622
From: Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
Originally posted by brain
Did they log the air/fuel? I'd like to see if there was a difference in how rich each car ran, and if any of Madwolf's changes were noticeable. 7 rwhp on power tuning is impressive.
Mad wolfs was a bit rich after the tune

www.speedinc.ca/catbacktune.jpg

the blue one is with the cat back, and the red one is with the tune too.
I made lots of runs, but just kept the two best ones on the graph.


www.speedinc.ca/baseline.jpg
this is stock for me.



this is a graph with all three of us, best runs.

www.speedinc.ca/allthree.jpg

I'm green,
the 95 is red
and hte 96z28 is blue
Old Mar 28, 2004 | 12:13 PM
  #12  
JetLag's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 130
From: Santa Cruz, California
The cat back gains were a little weak.
Old Mar 28, 2004 | 12:29 PM
  #13  
KeVMaN's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 645
From: Modesto, CA
Originally posted by JetLag
The cat back gains were a little weak.
he got 15 ft/lbs torque. thats not bad at all
Old Mar 28, 2004 | 12:31 PM
  #14  
LT1ponykilla's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 1,035
From: Greenville, SC
How were the catback gains weak? Its not like he added a 100shot. 7RWHP and 15RWTQ is good for such a mild upgrade.

And about the ram air deal. They may have more hp from the factory but at the track or street you cant tell a difference from what Ive seen. My buddy has a 02 Z28 and kills ram air cars at the track. Not just at the track street also. They may help a little but not worth the extra money imo.
Old Mar 28, 2004 | 12:48 PM
  #15  
SScamaro463's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 91
From: Tulsa OK
not bad #'s my stock SS with a dirty a$$ paper filter put down 275rwhp and 305tq all stock



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:47 PM.